Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts published in “Day: September 17, 2015”

How the IPO went major

harrislogo1

Yesterday IVN.US one of the most popular news sources for the independent voter movement, published an essay about the origins, emergence, and future of the Independent Party of Oregon.

While the IPO was founded on the more modest goal of assuring that any non affiliated candidate would have access to the Oregon ballot, it turned out that voters of all ideologies started joining the party to achieve much greater goals.

One thing that undoubtedly accelerated the IPO’s growth was that it’s formation coincided with the growing unhappiness with the two major parties. Specifically how they conducted elections, and especially the role that money plays in our elections and within the two major parties internal machinations. However this large influx of members with broadly represented political persuasions caused a bit of a dilemma for the leaders of the IPO who were at heart more progressive and democratic than not. From the essay:

The rapid growth of the party was not fueled by massive voter registration efforts, but merely by the presence of the Independent Party being an option on the ballot and the voter registration card. Democrats and Republicans claim voter confusion, but the reality is that voters *want* an Independent Party option. 11 percent of Oregonians identify as Independent Party members, even though only 5 percent of voters are currently registered with the party.

For the people who formed the party, this created an ethical dilemma: Could a relatively small number of officers claim to speak for a much larger number of people unless they asked members what they actually thought about candidates and issues? The answer is “no,” obviously. So the party opted for democracy.

Yet, the decision to find consensus among party members paid off. Maybe not for all of the leaderships progressive ideals, but certainly for the disaffected voters in Oregon who hungered for reasonably moderate candidates who were interested in the peoples business and not the Democratic versus Republican ideological battles . Because even though party members came from all parts of the political spectrum, it seemed there were policies that most people – regardless of ideology- supported. And that was a bit of a pleasant surprise.

The Agenda has been set and the Party is poised to become a broader movement supporting Independent candidates that are now emerging to challenge the current large donor dominated politics in Oregon.

First take/Debate

That was one long debate. I hadn't bothered to check in advance how long Wednesday's Republican presidential debate would run, figuring on the usual hour to 90 minutes. Instead it ran three hours, and close to a real three hours - there were relatively few commercial breaks. It was a little exhausting to watch, and the candidates - standing in place for three hours, always on call - must have been highly stressed. I'm guessing we won't see another anytime soon that runs as long. And for all that, the subject matter was surprisingly limited; in hindsight, it mostly seemed to come down to Iran, abortion, Russia and personal attacks.

It was nicely set up, however, to allow for some free flow and a considerable amount of interaction, and - in spite of the fact that a lot of it had to do with personal attacks - that was a good move away from the traditional glorified press conference approach. The candidates seemed to be (based on the called-out candidate names) boxed in to short answers; considering the long debate time, they should have been given more time to answer. But the interaction overall was welcome.

Candidate impressions? Carly Fiorina had a couple of very strong video moments. Her brief rebuttal to Donald Trump's "face" comment was the sharpest moment of the evening. Trump probably didn't hurt himself with his base, though he probably didn't make additional gains either, and overall he seemed a little diminished. If someone was looking for a candidate willing to substantively stand out from the crowd, Rand Paul gave them that, though whether that helped with the Republican electorate is unclear. Chris Christie seems to have undergone a careful media makeover, and had better delivery. Jeb Bush seemed not to have made needed progress, and lost his slap-match with Trump.

On to the next debate - oh, wait, that's the Democrats. - rs