Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts published in July 2025

Almanac chapter 4: Oregon governor

For some years, I've helped out in a peripheral way with the editing of Idaho and Oregon sections the Almanac of American Politics, the top single-volume reference book on that subject. A few months before publication, they send some of the text from the upcoming edition, and I post it here. Here's one of four sections from the book. Enjoy. - rs

For more than five decades, the Almanac of American Politics has set the standard for political reference books. In September, the Almanac will be publishing its 2026 edition, with more than 2,000 pages offering fully updated chapters on all 435 House members and their districts, all 100 senators, all 50 states and governors, and much more.

Below are excerpts from the new chapters in the 2026 Almanac on the state of Idaho / Oregon and Gov. Brad Little / Tina Kotek, written by Louis Jacobson. Jacobson — a senior correspondent for PolitiFact, a senior columnist for Sabato's Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia Center for Politics, and a contributor of political coverage for U.S. News & World Report — has written for eight editions of the Almanac since 2000. For the 2026 edition, he served as chief author.

Readers can receive a 15% discount if they purchase the new Almanac at its website and use the code Ridenbaugh2026 at checkout.

---

Democrat Tina Kotek, who was elected Oregon House speaker in 2013, won the governorship in 2022 after an unusual three-way contest. Kotek became one of the first two lesbian candidates to be elected governor in U.S. history, winning on the same day as Massachusetts' Maura Healey.

Kotek was raised in York, Pennsylvania. Her father worked for a company that built air conditioners; her mother was a homemaker who once lobbied the state to lift its sales tax on sewing patterns she used to make clothes. Kotek was a top student and a star in high school track and basketball. She was accepted to Georgetown University, but she dropped out after less than two years—she told the Oregonian that she "didn't fit in" because "everybody wanted to be a lawyer"—and moved to the Northwest in 1987. Kotek earned a bachelor's degree in religious studies from the University of Oregon and a master's in international studies from the University of Washington. She came out as gay in her early 20s; when she was there, the University of Washington didn't allow same-sex couples in campus housing, but Kotek pushed successfully to change that in 1997.

Kotek polished her policy chops while working for the Oregon Food Bank and Children First of Oregon, lobbying on such issues as the minimum wage, housing affordability and health insurance. After running unsuccessfully for the state House, Kotek won a seat in 2006, eventually serving as speaker from 2013 to 2022; she resigned to run for governor. In the Legislature, Kotek "collected progressive victories like pelts, showing a flair for muscling through bold bills and cobbling together unlikely coalitions," Dirk VanderHart wrote for Oregon Public Broadcasting. She helped expand health care coverage to undocumented residents; mandating lower-pollution vehicle fuels; increasing the minimum wage; increasing housing density; expanding gun controls; and codifying abortion rights. In the run-up to the post-2020 Census redistricting, Kotek cut a deal with Republicans, giving them equal representation on the map-drawing committee in exchange for GOP legislators agreeing not to stonewall legislation by leaving the Capitol to block a quorum, a tactic they had used on multiple occasions. Then, after passing key Democratic bills (and facing blowback from national Democrats), Kotek backed off her promise to the GOP by meddling with the committee structure; the Democrats got to draw maps they preferred after all.

Oregon's 2022 gubernatorial election was the first in 20 years featuring neither an incumbent nor a former governor. Outgoing Democratic Gov. Kate Brown's unpopularity weighed heavily; during her tenure, she'd had to grapple with anarchist protests and right-wing Proud Boys counterprotests that led to clashes in Portland. She's also dealt with the coronavirus pandemic and wildfires. Kotek, who had worked closely with Brown on legislation, tried to distance herself during the campaign. In the Democratic primary, her main opponent was state Treasurer Tobias Read; Nick Kristof, a longtime New York Times writer and Oregon native, tried to run, but he dropped out after the state Supreme Court rejected his residency credentials. Kotek defeated Read, 56%-32%. The seven-way GOP primary was wide open; former state House Minority Leader Christine Drazan won with 22.5 percent.

In the general election, former state Sen. Betsy Johnson, a rural Democrat and timber heir with a pro-business platform, ran as an independent; in one ad, she positioned herself by saying, "Oregonians are distrustful of the radical right. And they are terrified of the progressive left." Drazan hit Johnson and Kotek for being career politicians; Kotek tagged Johnson for her opposition to gun control; Johnson attacked Drazan for her opposition to abortion rights; and Johnson and Drazan attacked Kotek as antipolice. In the end, the state's blue instincts held: Kotek defeated Drazan, 47%-44%, with Johnson fading down the stretch and taking almost 9 percent. Kotek's win was only a bit narrower than Brown's 50%-44% reelection victory in 2018. Kotek was one of 12 women to win gubernatorial races in 2022—easily a record, according to the Rutgers University's Center for American Women and Politics.

After taking office, Kotek directed an effort to secure a three-year supply of the abortion medication mifepristone, amid concerns that the U.S. Supreme Court could outlaw it. A far-reaching Democratic bill to safeguard abortion and transgender rights sparked a major clash: The Republican minority walked out, blocking legislative activity for a record six weeks. It ended when legislative Democrats agreed to narrow some provisions, including the rules for parental consent for abortion, and dropping proposed expansions of abortion access on university campuses and in rural areas. (The Oregon Supreme Court later ruled that 10 Republican state senators who had walked out could not run for reelection under a voter-approved 2022 ballot measure designed to curb walkouts.) However, Kotek suffered a setback on legislation to ease regulations on land development near cities, which had been intended to increase housing supply and thus lower costs. This time, fellow Democrats scuttled the measure.

Sensitive to criticism about homelessness and public drug use in Portland, Kotek acted to pull back $2.7 million in state funds from Portland's Multnomah County, saying the county hadn't explained enough about how it would spend the money. Kotek said she'd met her first-year goals for additional shelter beds, rehousing homeless households and preventing transitions into homelessness. In 2024, reflecting public concerns about drug use, Kotek signed a landmark package of bills that reversed much of a voter-approved law that had decriminalized small amounts of illicit drugs, including heroin, cocaine and methamphetamine.

Kotek faced criticism in 2024 for exploring ways to create a role in the administration for her wife, Aimee Kotek Wilson. The effort had been controversial within her own office, reportedly factoring in the departure of several top aides, and Kotek backed off. For 2025, she has asked legislators to work on transportation and education funding.

 

Almanac chapter 3: Oregon

For some years, I've helped out in a peripheral way with the editing of Idaho and Oregon sections the Almanac of American Politics, the top single-volume reference book on that subject. A few months before publication, they send some of the text from the upcoming edition, and I post it here. Here's one of four sections from the book. Enjoy. - rs

For more than five decades, the Almanac of American Politics has set the standard for political reference books. In September, the Almanac will be publishing its 2026 edition, with more than 2,000 pages offering fully updated chapters on all 435 House members and their districts, all 100 senators, all 50 states and governors, and much more.

Below are excerpts from the new chapters in the 2026 Almanac on the state of Idaho / Oregon and Gov. Brad Little / Tina Kotek, written by Louis Jacobson. Jacobson — a senior correspondent for PolitiFact, a senior columnist for Sabato's Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia Center for Politics, and a contributor of political coverage for U.S. News & World Report — has written for eight editions of the Almanac since 2000. For the 2026 edition, he served as chief author.

Readers can receive a 15% discount if they purchase the new Almanac at its website and use the code Ridenbaugh2026 at checkout.

---

Oregon is a blue state, even though its rural areas are as Republican as other portions of the American West. That's because almost half of the state's population—47 percent—lives in the counties in and around Portland.

Oregon has popularized bike trails, light-rail trams, plug-in stations for electric cars, handcrafted ales, and small-batch distilleries. It sells Pendleton shirts and Nike sneakers to the world. Yet you can still see much of the same Oregon that Meriwether Lewis and William Clark saw in 1805, when they came down the Columbia River gorge, past the Willamette River to the Pacific Ocean. A few years later, in 1811, John Jacob Astor set up his fur trading post at Astoria. But few Americans came overland until the 1840s, when New England Yankees and Missouri farmers drove wagons along the Oregon Trail and floated down the Columbia to the Willamette Valley. In this remote spot, nearly 2,000 miles from the Mississippi River frontier and 700 miles from the small Mexican settlements in California, they built an orderly, productive society—a kind of western New England. It grew steadily, with a few booms: in the early 1900s, from timber harvesting; during World War II, when Kaiser built ships in Portland Oregon and Vancouver Washington; and in the 1970s, when Americans began to appreciate Oregon's natural environment.

Oregon also has a dark strain of history. When the state's constitution was written, it included a provision barring the relocation of any Black person to the state, and another that precluded Black ownership of real estate. The Klan had a significant presence in the state in the early 20th century, and communities of skinheads flourished in the 1980s. It took until 1959 for Oregon to ratify the post-Civil War 15th Amendment, which guaranteed Blacks the right to vote. During the winter of 2016, a breakaway group of armed protesters occupied the headquarters of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge in the state's rural, southeastern corner, decrying federal encroachment on private lands and prompting a 41-day standoff that led to one death and more than a dozen guilty pleas for conspiracy and trespassing. In 2017, a man screamed anti-Muslim insults on a commuter train and proceeded to stab two men to death and injure a third.

Although the image of "kombucha-swilling, artisan knot-loving, bicycle-riding haven" (as the Oregonian newspaper once put it) is based in reality—and was lovingly satirized by Fred Armisen and Carrie Brownstein in IFC television's "Portlandia"—the city has more recently been known for violent clashes between far-right groups and far-left "antifa," or antifascists. In 2020, after the death of Black Minneapolis resident George Floyd at the hands of police, Portland became a hub of street protests, even though it is the nation's whitest city with a population of at least 500,000. The clashes' reality was often more complicated than the popular image. The biggest protests were peaceful and diverse, but others included anarchists with even more radical aims than Black Lives Matter protesters; they battled with police and sometimes with right-wing groups, setting fires and vandalizing the federal courthouse and police headquarters. President Donald Trump seized on the conflict, sending federal agents into Portland to protect federal property, but without the support of local officials, and sometimes without identifying insignias. Then-Gov. Kate Brown, who initially tolerated the "occupation" of large swaths of the city, later called it "political theater" and a "blatant abuse of power." Eventually, Brown and Vice President Mike Pence brokered an agreement for the federal forces to leave; although some clashes continued, the unrest ratcheted down.

Oregon grew much faster than the national average in the 1940s, when war industries brought thousands of people to the West Coast, and again in the 1970s, when the pleasant environment attracted so many people that containing growth became a dominant local issue. "Come and visit us again and again," Republican Gov. Tom McCall told outsiders. "But for heaven's sake don't come here to live." At his prodding, the legislature in 1973 passed a law that limited development, and in the 1990s, metropolitan Portland sharply restricted growth and sprawl. These measures were also popular in the university towns of Eugene and Corvallis and to a lesser extent in the suburbs. But clamping down on development brought higher housing costs, and the state is still struggling to find the right mix. In 2019, Brown signed the nation's first statewide rent control law and a separate measure requiring cities of at least 10,000 residents to permit duplexes in areas of single-family homes, and even quadruplexes in the Portland area.

Amid tighter federal and state regulation and greater automation, Oregon has lost 40 percent of its forestry jobs since 2001 and one-third of its mill jobs. The state has also grappled with a downside of its verdant surroundings: wildfires. In 2020, Oregon had more than 1,400 square miles burned in just three days, double the usual amount for a whole year. The following year, the Bootleg Fire scorched an area bigger than New York City, making it the third-largest fire in Oregon since 1900. In 2024, the Durkee Fire scorched more than 450 square miles. Meanwhile, in 2024, workers finished demolishing four hydropower dams along a 240-mile stretch of the Klamath River, hoping to revive the river's salmon, which will provide nearby Native Americans with their traditional sustenance.

The growth of high-tech companies around Portland, driven by Intel, prompted the nickname Silicon Forest, though the chipmaker has struggled in the age of artificial intelligence. Oregon is a top exporter; computer and electronic products are the biggest, totaling about $9 billion annually. Befitting Oregon's location on the Pacific Rim, the state's top trading partners outside of North America are China and Malaysia. The port of Portland ships motor vehicles and agricultural commodities, though its money-losing container operation avoided closure in 2024 only after the state stepped in with funding. Oregon ranks high in science, technology, engineering and math workers and in inflows of college graduates. In 2023, Oregon scrapped its prohibition—on the books since 1951—on drivers pumping their own gasoline, leaving New Jersey as the nation's last holdout.

Oregon's population has risen by 11.5 percent since 2010, enough to secure an additional House seat after the 2020 Census, but it has stagnated this decade, particularly in the city of Portland, where population fell by 22,000 from 2000 to 2023. The three biggest counties in the Portland metro area—Multnomah, Washington and Clackamas—also shrank during that period. Growth has been stronger in Deschutes County—a 32 percent increase since 2010, driven by a boom in Bend, a onetime blue-collar locale that has recently become a destination for scenic tourism and families looking to move into pleasant surroundings. (Bend is also home to the planet's only remaining Blockbuster Video store.) Oregon's rural population is a rapidly diminishing proportion of the state, heightening its resentment toward more liberal metro Portland; voters in 13 eastern Oregon counties have backed joining a conservative "greater Idaho," which would require approval from both states and Congress. Oregon's population is 2.4 percent Black, almost 15 percent Hispanic and a little more than 5 percent Asian. Washington County in suburban Portland is increasingly diverse—13 percent Asian and 19 percent Hispanic. Marion County (Salem) and the farming counties east of the Cascades also have relatively high Hispanic percentages.

Though Oregon was largely founded by missionaries, the religiously unaffiliated form the core constituency for some of the state's policy innovations over the last two generations. Oregon legalized most abortions prior to the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision, and it decriminalized medical marijuana and legalized assisted suicide in referendums in 1994 and 1997. In 2007, the Democratic-controlled Legislature banned discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and mandated recycling of discarded electronics. It has also imposed strict limits on smoking. In 2022, the state became the first in the nation to enable children to be kept continuously on Medicaid through age 6. Meanwhile, the state has some of the oldest sanctuary policies for undocumented immigrants, and in 2018, voters rejected a ballot measure that would have overturned those protections. Oregon was also among the most active states in filing lawsuits opposing the Trump administration's immigration policies.

However, Oregonians are starting to rein in their tolerance on some issues. With its high housing costs, Oregon has the third highest rate of homelessness of any state, and the highest rate of homelessness for unaccompanied youth. In 2024, the city of Grants Pass won a case at the U.S. Supreme Court that allows jurisdictions to ban people sleeping outdoors; in the 6-3 ruling, the justices said such laws do not violate the Constitution's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. Oregon has also backtracked on drug policy. Voters approved legalized recreational marijuana in 2014, but in recent years, supply has outpaced demand, straining programs that rely on marijuana tax revenue. In rural portions of southwestern Oregon near the California border, illicit marijuana growth has led to lawlessness, some linked to foreign cartels. Then, in 2020, voters approved the regulated medical use of psilocybin, a hallucinogen sometimes called "magic mushrooms." It passed by double-digit margins. However, after the state experienced persistent rates of addiction and overdoses, the Legislature in 2024 repealed most of the experiment in drug decriminalization, which 58 percent of voters had supported in 2020. Now, the possession of small amounts of illicit drugs, including heroin, fentanyl and methamphetamine, is again a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail.

Oregon was the second state after South Dakota to give voters direct decision-making via ballot measures. Oregon pioneered the election of senators by popular vote and, with Michigan in 1908, the recall of elected officials. It was the first to adopt all-mail elections; as a result, there really is no Election Day in Oregon. Voting has tended to produce strong margins for progressive candidates and positions in Portland and the university towns of Eugene and Corvallis and huge conservative margins in counties east of the Cascades and in much of southwestern Oregon, where discontent over timber policy has lingered. Although moderates dominated the state Republican Party through the 1990s, the party's remnants have shifted too far to the right to be competitive statewide. In March 2022, state Sen. Dallas Heard stepped down as state GOP chair, saying, "My physical and spiritual health can no longer survive exposure to the toxicity that can be found in this community."

Oregon has not been a presidential battleground in recent elections; it voted for Hillary Clinton by 11 points in 2016, Joe Biden by 16 in 2020, and Kamala Harris by 14 in 2024. A Republican has not won a gubernatorial race since 1982. In early 2019, the only Republican to win statewide in years, Secretary of State Dennis Richardson, died of brain cancer; in 2020, a Democrat won the office. In 2022, voters approved a landmark gun control ballot measure, though only by about a percentage point. The law requires a permit and safety training to buy a firearm and would prohibit magazines larger than 10 rounds; it was challenged in the courts, but in March 2025, the state's second-highest court gave its approval.

In 2024, Democrats won every statewide office on the ballot and flipped the House seat held by Republican Lori Chavez-DeRemer. (Chavez-DeRemer was later appointed Labor Secretary by Trump.) Democrats also gained a seat in each legislative chamber, reaching the 60 percent majority required for revenue-raising measures without Republican support. However, voters made heterodox choices in ballot measures; they rejected ranked-choice voting and a proposal to raise taxes on corporations and distribute the proceeds to residents, but they greenlighted collective bargaining for cannabis workers.

 

#+C&**/%+#($@+

If you can read that, you probably swear as much as I do and you know just what I meant instead of using the actual words.  Those are not good, respectable words, actually.

I find myself using more "foul" words lately - more than in previous times.  Our mass and social communications are full of the foul and getting - er, well, fouler.

As a journalist/broadcaster for several decades, I usually know the right words - the respectable words - to use.  I was raised in a home where "not a discouraging word" was used or heard.  In short, I know better.

But, as a casual Facebook user, I'm amazed - and often disgusted - by the continual use of such printed words in postings.  Both in memes and individually written texts.

Sometimes, the gutter words - F**k, S**t, pi***d and more - seem to be in nearly every post.  They're used - and reposted - by people I know don't use such words in their everyday activities.  For some, they're probably repulsed by others who use them.  But we all know what they are.

They've become verbal crutches for a lot of folks who think their use makes you sound more angry or more "adult" or authoritarian.  In the stands at sporting events, heard at an adjoining table in a restaurant or just used in otherwise normal, day-to-day talk or postings between acquaintances.

As a society, we've either become more accepting of their use or we've learned to ignore them.  They add nothing to any communication so if you block them out, you won't have missed anything.

For most of us, the shock value - if there ever was such thing - has worn off.  Maybe that's why they creep into our speech without a second thought.  I read more of them in a week online than I remember hearing in a year while living on a mountaintop above the Arctic Circle with 40 other guys 50 years ago.

It wasn't so long ago the American public was shocked - shocked, I tell you - when Clark Gable said to Vivian Leigh in Gone With The Wind, "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn!"  Now, you hear a lot worse than that on your TV any night of the week.  You can even watch "constipated" actors sitting on toilets or bears in the woods wiping their butts with the latest tissue.  The goal posts for shock value have been moved way, way down the field.

The overall courseness in our nation is an ever-present and growing societal reality.  You don't like it.  I don't like it.  But, it's hard to escape.   Politicians are using the "bad words" in speeches.  (See any Trump rally.)  Older folks, raised in more restrictive times, now post or re-post online words I would have gotten a soapy mouthwash for at home.  A lot of young people - who certainly know better - pepper conversations and texts with 'em.  They're everywhere.

We've gotten way past "damn" or hell" or other such old expletives.  And we're not going back.  The new, casual, more common use of profanity has worked its way into our usual, everyday language.  Most of us try to ignore it.  Most of us won't use it.  But it's ever-present.  And we're getting inured to it.

Damn!

 

Betting on MAGA

The envelope in my mailbox screamed out, “this ENDORSEMENT has IDAHO LIBERALS worried.” Fearing the worst, I gingerly opened the envelope, only to find that the liberals were supposed to be worried because Governor Brad Little had “received the complete and total endorsement of President Donald Trump in June.”

We have had good reason to believe that the Governor was headed toward full-on MAGA. After all, his support for substantial cuts to Medicaid this session and his belief that parents who send their kids to private and religious schools should get a tax credit of $5,000 per kid, is right in line with the MAGA playbook. Little’s letter begged for campaign funds so that he can implement MAGA policy in Idaho for four more years.

Little strongly supported Trump’s Big Beautiful Billionaire Bill (BBBB), which will explode the national debt to an unsustainable 40 trillion dollars and result in the largest ever transfer of wealth from poor to rich Americans. The Idaho Fiscal Policy Center estimates that top income earners will get an average of $78,000, while the lowest earners will get only $20. Over the next decade the bill will cut $4.3 billion in federal funding for Idaho Medicaid and reduce enrollment in the state by up to 40,000 people. Heaven help our local hospitals. SNAP and other safety net programs will also sustain massive cuts.

Senators Risch and Crapo have already signed onto the full Trump program and both voted for the BBBB. In fact, Crapo was the chief architect of the Senate bill, making deeper cuts to Medicaid than the House version and increasing the amount of national debt we are bestowing upon future generations. In recognition of Crapo’s major role, Trump’s office distributed a lovely picture of Crapo looking quite pleased at the BBBB signing ceremony. Let’s pray that modest-income Idahoans don’t get sick.

The BBBB drafters were clever to disguise the damage their handiwork will do to working people. The tax benefits for the wealthy will kick in right away, but the massive cuts in safety net spending for the masses will only kick in after the midterm elections next year. To top off their allegiance to Trump’s command, both Risch and Crapo voted last week to cut 1 billion dollars for public radio and public television. The Trump regime has no use for cultural programming or balanced reporting.

Little, Risch and Crapo seem to think that obedience to Trump is a ticket to keeping their precious offices. Reading the tea leaves, including the most recent polling, it is a good bet that they are woefully wrong. By the time the general election rolls around next year, I expect that Americans, including a majority of Idahoans, will have had enough. It is likely that Idaho’s MAGA sycophants will lose out to candidates who are willing to honorably and courageously serve their state and nation.

Take Trump's premier issue–immigration. Voters responded to Trump’s call to remove violent criminals from the country, but they are now recoiling at his rounding up and mistreatment of law-abiding, tax-paying laborers who are milking cows, tending crops, cleaning hotel rooms and performing a range of other services that citizens refuse to do. And, as they say, we ain’t seen nothin’ yet. With the BBBB’s $170.7 billion in funding for immigration and border enforcement, the unsavory conduct of ICE agents will only get worse. The 10,000 new agents hired with that money will be Trump loyalists, whose activities will very likely expand beyond the immigration arena to intimidation and coercion of American citizens. That won’t go over well.

Trump has done little to address the cost of living, the other main issue that put him in office. He has taken no meaningful action since his inauguration to lessen the cost of living. In fact, prices of food and other essentials have continued to rise.

The chaotic actions taken by Trump on tariffs will result in even greater price increases across the board. Let’s take two examples–tomatoes and coffee. Trump has announced a 17% tariff on fresh tomatoes from Mexico where we get about 70% of our supply. The purported purpose is to protect U.S. growers, but Trump did not say where we are going to get the workers to grow and harvest the crop.

Trump threatened to slap a 50% tariff on all imports from Brazil unless prosecution proceedings are halted against his bosom buddy, Jair Bolsonaro, for trying to stage a coup against Brazil’s duly-elected president. That makes our president look like a lawless despot. And it would certainly cause the price of a cup of coffee to skyrocket.

Suffice it to say that when the midterm elections are upon us, Little and Risch will likely be scrambling to distance themselves from Trump’s governmental malpractice. It is doubtful they will keep their seats. Crapo won’t have to answer until 2028.

 

The insiders at Boardman

In American politics of recent decades, private organizations, nonprofit and for-profit, often are held out as superior actors to their governmental counterparts when it comes to doing almost anything. For many political people, especially though not exclusively on the right, non-public preference is an article of faith.

Obviously, many and maybe most non-public organizations in fact do work well. But the dangers of bad action can open up easily when activities in the public interest operate in the shadows.

The point turns up implicitly in the legal case Attorney General Dan Rayfield filed July 15 against a group of people in, of all places, the Boardman area.

The point here isn’t to prejudge the case, which so far consists of allegations but not verdicts. Given that, the scenario laid out in the case should give pause to Oregonians in many places at a time when local organizations of all kinds are coming under diminishing news reporting and other scrutiny. That this one came to the attention of the attorney general’s office at all — and bearing in mind that the suit has been filed seven years after the events at its core took place — might be its most surprising element.

The story stretches back to the work of the Greater Eastern Oregon Development Corporation (which has no direct connection to the new lawsuit), founded in 1982. It is a nonprofit corporation, now a 501(c)(3) set up to provide financing and other help for economic development in a vast area covering most of eastern Oregon.

In January 2001, as part of its economic development efforts, it crafted a plan to greatly expand internet access through the region, especially by way of strong high-capacity fiber optic networks. The most dramatic offshoot of that effort came in Morrow County, where a new non-profit was formed: The Inland Development Corporation. Its history says that “in stepping to the forefront of these development activities, Inland Development has taken a leadership role in deploying broadband services to communities within 8 Eastern Oregon counties, with plans to grow into and assist even more.” The non-profit organization was set up to provide a broadly public service.

So far, so good.

Such growth, helpful as it has been to many people in the region, doesn’t just happen. In this case it happened with involvement by a group of organizations — the Port of Morrow at Boardman, Morrow County and Morrow Development Corporation – and people who work with those organizations. It was in the actions of some of the people, Rayfield alleges, that things took a bad turn.

Although Inland was created to bring broadband services to the area, it didn’t do that directly. Instead (according to the AG), in 2004 it formed a new for-profit corporation called Windwave, and “over time, Windwave became Inland’s sole service provider, installing and maintaining its fiber optic network in eastern Oregon.” This development, in which a non-profit became the shell for a for-profit group, appears to have drawn little attention or comment.

The direction of what happened next was led by four men (called “insiders” in the legal case), who served on the boards of both Inland and Windwave, and were leaders of the original supporting organizations (two were Port of Morrow commissioners, one was its general manager, and another was a Morrow County commissioner).

The filing said they “decided that they were interested in buying Windwave from Inland.” There doesn’t seem to have been any public offering of the for-profit; this appears to have been intended as a private transaction. The public relying on its internet service seems not to have been aware that their service, ostensibly run by a regional non-profit, was instead being sold off to four individuals.

The core of the state lawsuit had to do with the purchase price, which was about $2.6 million. It said that while the four “insiders” hired a Portland firm to value Windwave, they did not provide adequate information to properly value it, and based its value on the projection that Windwave’s business would be entering a period of decline instead of the explosion — because of the impending arrival of massive data centers to the Boardman area — that was just around the corner.

There’s some detail about this in the lawsuit. It notes that one of the four, “the General Manager of the Port of Morrow, a government entity that facilitated Amazon.com’s purchase of multiple land parcels where it intended to develop new data center sites in Morrow County. Two of the other Insiders, Marvin Padberg and Jerry Healy, attended Port of Morrow Commission closed executive sessions where Neal disclosed his non-public communications with Amazon.com representatives relating to Amazon.com’s plans to purchase land parcels in Morrow County.”

The damages the state is seeking amount to $6.9 million or the voiding of the Windwave sale. Rayfield’s office said “The insider sale of Windwave not only diverted public value into private hands but potentially undermined the long-term availability of affordable broadband for these essential services.”

So: Who really owns and operates the services where you live? What are the implications of that for you and your community?

How many other cases around Oregon might there be?

(image)

 

Killing Big Bird

Perhaps it was inevitable.

“REPUBLICANS HAVE TRIED DOING THIS FOR 40 YEARS, AND FAILED….BUT NO MORE,” Donald Trump boasted of the GOP roasting Big Bird.

Now, they’ve finally done it after all these years, cut a billion dollars that effectively eliminates the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB).

I will mourn the destruction of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), a profoundly wrongheaded and unnecessary attack on civility, decency and quality journalism, for the rest of my days. The reasons are personal, cultural and journalistic.

My start in broadcasting was behind the microphone of a college radio station in eastern South Dakota. I did the morning show, a little music, mostly news and sports and the weather of course. I believed even then that non-commercial radio could do the kinds of things that ratings dependent, used car dealer and marijuana dispensary supported AM or FM stations never could or would do.

I once broadcast a livestock show and a track meet. Not at the same time. As a college senior I covered the South Dakota legislature, providing daily interviews and news reports back to my home base, but also to stations all over the state who wouldn’t or couldn’t have their own “man in Pierre.”

The experience shaped my outlook on news and public service. And what is happening to public broadcasting makes me sad and damn mad.

“This is, in our view, the misuse of taxpayer dollars,” House Speaker Mike Johnson said in justifying the elimination of federal funding for public broadcasting. “They’re not objective. They pretend to be so.”

Johnson likely never took a journalism course. What horse pucky from a sanctimonious little man of destruction.

I remember on the first day of one of my college courses the instructor, a former long-time reporter who knew of what he spoke, said rather bluntly: “Objectivity is impossible, but fairness is not.”

The ideologues on the far right aren’t into fairness. They’re all for free expression until they don’t like what you say, or what you report and then it’s labeled “woke” or “biased.”

That college station where I learned so much is likely to suffer crippling reductions in staff and programming. Or worse.

“I don’t think this is about bias in media,” Julie Overgaard, the executive director of South Dakota Public Broadcasting (SDPB) said after the House of Representatives affirmed the Senate’s slashing of funding for CPB. “I think this is about trying to shutter and change people’s access to information, to public safety, to education, to things that make a big, big difference.”

She’s spot on.

As the South Dakota Searchlight reported:

In addition to news coverage, [SDPB] provides live video and audio feeds of legislative and state government meetings, educational content, cultural programming, high school activities broadcasts, and emergency alerts across the state.

A great deal of that, maybe most of that, will now go away, voted out of existence not in the interest of service to constituents, but because congressional Republican have ceded their Constitutional authority over the federal budget to an arrogant and passionate group of far right ideologues intent on destroying America’s hard won global leadership in higher education and scientific research, and now independent, fair public broadcasting.

These ideologues also want to defund public schools and tell smart students from around the world to stay away from the nation’s best colleges and universities. It’s not the bias they want to kill; it’s the commitment to information in a discerning society.

Destroying public broadcasting saves small change, but it’s big for shuttering minds. And what’s not objective about “Antiques Roadshow,” or Ken Burns on the Civil War or the incredible science program, NOVA, or a spectacularly well reported NPR program like “Marketplace.

Every western Republican save one, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, all representing vast areas of rural America, voted to kill or dramatically reduce public broadcasting funding.

South Dakota’s all GOP delegation knew what the cuts would mean for their constituents, and they did it anyway. Same with Montana, Wyoming and Idaho. ¹

“Collectively, the stations in the public media network give 99% of the U.S. population access to public broadcasting,” High Country News reported recently. “Nearly half of CPB grantees are rural, and together they employ close to 6,000 people.”

Cliff Bentz, the Republican congressman from most of Oregon (at least in terms of acres) has two stations in his sprawling district that will be hard pressed to stay on the air. One of the stations is on the Warm Springs Reservation in eastern Oregon.

Over the last week that station’s website has been full of information about a nearby wildfire, the largest burning in the country. Wildfire information, as Stephen Colbert might say, has a well-known liberal bias.

“From the Community Calendar to 6 local newscasts weekday mornings, from language lessons to local news, cultural, educational and informational programming – you can rely on KWSO to inform, educate and entertain,” the station says.

Well, probably not now after their congressman’s vote.

Other Republicans like Idaho’s Mike Simpson used the CPB vote to display the depth of their hypocrisy and the totality of the hold Trump has on people like Simpson. The eastern Idaho congressman is one of the top appropriators in the House, and up until last week he claimed to be a champion of public broadcasting and a defender of the constitutional role of Congress in making spending decisions.

In the department of rich irony, Simpson, in February was presented with the “Champion of Public Broadcasting Award” from the nation’s public TV stations. In presenting the award the group president said:

Congressman Simpson has been an unwavering supporter of the essential value of local public broadcasting stations and the important role stations like Idaho Public Television play in communities throughout the nation, especially in serving rural communities. He has always been an effective champion of public broadcasting, and we are proud to have earned his enduring support.

We are extremely grateful for Congressman Simpson’s ongoing, strong commitment to ensuring all Americans have access to the essential local services provided by public television stations, from emergency alerts and warnings, to high-quality, educational resources and local programming and events that foster community connections. We are honored to present Congressman Mike Simpson with the 2025 Champion of Public Broadcasting Award he so richly deserves.

Enduring, ongoing, strong. Yeh, Right.

Simpson voted to kill Big Bird – twice. And, of course, he originally voted for the money he has now decided to eliminate. ²

Republicans who have killed the funding for public broadcast claim they need to get the federal budget under control, and they’re right – they do. Spending public dollars, however, is about establishing priorities.

Here’s one priority from the recent Republican legislation that took an axe to rural hospitals and food assistance – an enormous tax break for Silicon Valley investors who got rich on technology start up companies.

The “qualified small business stock exclusion,” has been around for a while, but the GOP Congress just made the tax break much fatter for founders and investors who cash out stock and skip out on paying taxes. Much fatter to the tune of $17 billion over ten years.

The CPB budget, in contrast, amounts to one one-hundredth of a percent (0.01%) of the federal budget. It really is about priorities.

Perhaps even worse than a decision to kill CPB after nearly 60 years is the admission for a number of Republicans that they didn’t really know what they were cutting in Donald Trump’s recession bill.

“Please give us specific information about where the cuts will come,” said Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker, who, of course, voted to let the White House do what it wanted. “Let’s not make a habit of this. Let's not consider this a precedent.”

Good luck with that.

Congress is dealing, after all, with a guy with the budget acumen of a genius who bankrupt a casino and a director of the Office of Management and Budget – the real president, it seems – who is hell bent on destroying pretty much everything, now including Sesame Street.

I can’t leave this without another reflection on the bias accusation, a charge thrown at me many a time when a viewer just didn’t like a guest, a show, a subject or felt their own, often blinkered point of view got short shrift.

It’s less a reflection on my humble career than on the broader public broadcasting mindset that in my years of hosting public affairs programs – I did thousands of interviews – I had a mandate to interview interesting and significant people of every political persuasion. Smaller market commercial TV has rarely, if ever, done the same on that scale or depth.

So I did 30 minutes with William F. Buckley, one of the most fascinating guests ever. And I should note Buckley’s TV show was carried for years on PBS.

I interviewed a guy named Reed Irvine, the founder of Accuracy in Media, a group that regularly bashed almost every news organization in the country.

I interviewed many conservative corporate and business leaders, including William Agee, who drove the company once known as Morrison-Knudsen off a cliff after being brought in to save it, and John Fery, a nice guy who built Boise Cascade into a wood products giant and was just a bit to the right of Herbert Hoover.

I covered the Idaho legislature for many years, anchoring a daily show from the statehouse that overwhelmingly featured – no big surprise in Idaho – Republican legislators, even some who voted (for a year) to end state support for public television. I’m still proud that a very conservative guy with a mind as big as his wallet stepped in to underwrite our broadcast.

Here’s something that gets lost in the purely partisan strum und drang of Republican justifications of killing things like public broadcasting: it’s not just about closing some rural NPR stations or starving out of business a PBS station in rural America.

This is part and parcel of an ultra-conservative effort to destroy sources of vital, independent and fair journalism - all across the media landscape.

There are many, many proof points for the fact that authoritarianism has come to the United States in the shape of the current administration and it’s bootlickers in Congress, but killing off independent sources of news, information and entertainment is about as fascist adjacent as it comes.

As important as public broadcasting is to me and to millions of Americans, killing CPB is just one step of many … and they will continue.

As Paul Farhi wrote yesterday in The Atlantic:

Ever since he launched his presidential campaign in 2015, Trump has fulminated against “the fake news.” But only in his second term has Trump gone beyond such rhetoric to wage a multifront war on media freedom with all of the tools at his disposal: executive actions, lawsuits, a loyal regulatory bureaucracy, a compliant Republican majority in Congress and a sympathetic Supreme Court. Each of his actions has been extraordinary in its own right; collectively, they represent a slow-motion demolition of the Fourth Estate.

The principal question isn’t just whether anyone can stop Trump, but whether anyone in power really wants to.

Make no mistake this is all about shuttering and changing people’s access to information, to public safety, to education.

It’s what authoritarians do.

 

The theocracy lobby

Think Idaho can’t possibly drift much further into extremism? If so, you should find out more about what may soon become the most powerful political lobby in the state, the Idaho Family Policy Center.

Its website describes its intent  “to engage the culture, train statesmen, and equip Christians and churches to advance the cultural commission” in words sounding benign enough.

But read the recent independent report about it from InvestigateWest and you’ll get a different picture. The group’s president, Blaine Conzatti, for example, “has sometimes bristled at labels like ‘Christian nationalism’ and ‘theocracy,’ wanting to distinguish his beliefs from white nationalists and Iranian ayatollahs. Conzatti stressed that he would never ‘force someone to worship contrary to their conscience’ [how generous of him!] but pressed by InvestigateWest, he acknowledged that his perfect Idaho would allow only Christians to serve in public office.”

You should fairly assume that by “Christians,” that means his kind of Christians - not mainline or Unitarian or LDS church members, and probably not but so many evangelical believers, but rather those like the devout of the Moscow church led by Doug Wilson. That’s the church whose firebrand tone has rattled area residents (local residents concerned enough to have held large meetings about it) and has a close linkage to the now-secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, who was a headliner at an IFPC event last year. That’s an indication of the very real (political-secular) power behind this group.

The IFPC also is connected to several other similar groups arising in other states. It has announced partners including Focus on the Family, Family Research Council and Family Policy Alliance; look them up.

Wilson apparently is not formally linked to the new organization, but as InvestigateWest notes, “his fingerprints are everywhere.”

Wilson has told Politico that  “he wants to destigmatize the notion of theocracy.” Please remember what theocracy, and what the actual examples of it are like, in places like Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia and Iran, and long ago in medieval Europe. It entails government operated solely by and for the benefit of one specific religious group, one section of us, to dominate everyone else. Freedom of speech, religion, assembly. conscience or anything else be damned. .

The group is doing plenty of outreach, holding high profile events, launches and a podcast and much more.

So what do they want at this point?

One early starting point, InvestigateWest points out,  has been a bill introduced in the last legislative session (House Bill 162 sponsored by Representative Jordan Redman of Coeur d’Alene) which says, “Selections from the King James version, the new King James version, or the revised standard version of the Bible shall be read each morning of each instructional day in each occupied classroom in all public school districts.” The bill got no further than the House Education Committee, but it will be back, and Conzatti points out, accurately, that bills like this often take two or three years to pass.

Call that step one in the religious and cultural indoctrination and domination of a state.

How far it may go could be suggested by the launch, sometime this year, of a new law foundation seemingly to press its agenda by legal action  and force compliance (to its satisfaction) of laws it likes.

Implications? InvestigateWest had this comment from Liz Yates at the Western States Center: “anti-democratic … They are trying to install a theocracy in which the authority of government comes not from the people, but from the Bible. And people who don’t subscribe to that form of Christianity are the ones who are excluded.”

Remember the Idaho Freedom Foundation, with its vaunted “index” of rankings that has frightened so many Idaho legislators to vote its way for so many years? How quaint. It seems to have a little less juice these days than it once did, and may be in the process of being supplanted as the top dog among Idaho influencers.

Watch this new development come the next legislative session for clues about where public life in Idaho may be headed next.

(image)

Almanac chapter 2: Idaho governor

For some years, I've helped out in a peripheral way with the editing of Idaho and Oregon sections the Almanac of American Politics, the top single-volume reference book on that subject. A few months before publication, they send some of the text from the upcoming edition, and I post it here. Here's one of four sections from the book. Enjoy. - rs

For more than five decades, the Almanac of American Politics has set the standard for political reference books. In September, the Almanac will be publishing its 2026 edition, with more than 2,000 pages offering fully updated chapters on all 435 House members and their districts, all 100 senators, all 50 states and governors, and much more.

Below are excerpts from the new chapters in the 2026 Almanac on the state of Idaho / Oregon and Gov. Brad Little / Tina Kotek, written by Louis Jacobson. Jacobson — a senior correspondent for PolitiFact, a senior columnist for Sabato's Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia Center for Politics, and a contributor of political coverage for U.S. News & World Report — has written for eight editions of the Almanac since 2000. For the 2026 edition, he served as chief author.

Readers can receive a 15% discount if they purchase the new Almanac at its website and use the code Ridenbaugh2026 at checkout.

---

After winning a hotly contested primary in 2022 as a pragmatic Republican, Brad Little signed a raft of conservative legislation during his second term.

Little is a third-generation Idahoan whose grandfather emigrated from Scotland in 1894 and became "Idaho's Sheep King," establishing an operation that spanned much of southwest Idaho. His son carried on the business, and his grandson worked on the ranch while growing up and after graduating from the University of Idaho in 1977. Little served as president of the Idaho Wool Growers Association, chaired two committees of the American Sheep Industry Association, and chaired the Idaho Association of Commerce and Industry. But the family sold the sheep operation and entered the cattle business. They also opened some of their land as an off-road vehicle park.

The family's second business was politics. Little's father served in the state Legislature and was a Republican National Committee member; as a youngster, Little helped his father campaign for Barry Goldwater in 1964. Four years later, he sat next to Ronald Reagan at the Republican National Convention. In 1972, Little became a delegate. In 2001, GOP Gov. Dirk Kempthorne appointed Little to a vacant state Senate seat, and he proceeded to win election four times. Then, in 2009, Little was appointed to the vacant lieutenant governorship and won the seat on his own in 2010 and 2014. When three-term Republican Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter said he wouldn't run again, Little jumped in and received Otter's endorsement.

Little was the establishment favorite, focusing on traditional Republican priorities such as low taxes and limited spending, but he faced two other major candidates in the free-spending, attack-ad-saturated 2018 primary: Rep. Raúl Labrador, a member of the House Freedom Caucus, and Tommy Ahlquist, a developer running as an outsider. Little got 38 percent, followed by Labrador with 33 percent and Ahlquist with 27 percent. In the Democratic primary, Paulette Jordan, a progressive former state House member and former Coeur d'Alene Tribal Council official, upset establishment favorite A.J. Balukoff. Little, running a largely orthodox Republican campaign, siphoned some moderate Democratic voters away from Jordan and won, 60%-38%.

In his first year in office, Little expressed discomfort with some of the provisions of legislation to implement Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, including a work requirement, but he ultimately signed them into law. Little signed a bill expanding concealed carry to 18- to 20-year-olds in cities. Liberals liked Little's renewal of the state's commitment to accept refugees, acknowledgement that climate change needed addressing, and enactment of higher starting pay for teachers. But Little ignored opposition from major Idaho employers—including Chobani, Clif Bar, Hewlett-Packard and Micron—when he signed one bill that would ban transgender girls and women from the state's female sports teams, and another that would effectively prevent residents from changing their gender on birth certificates. Within months, a federal court voided the birth certificate bill.

During the coronavirus pandemic, Little restricted public gatherings, which put him on a collision course with the most conservative Idahoans, including Ammon Bundy, who had once taken over a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon for 41 days, and Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin. In May 2021, McGeachin claimed her own authority to reshape policy when Little was out of state, issuing an executive order that banned mask mandates. Little rescinded the order on his return, but McGeachin tried again in October with orders barring mandatory vaccination and coronavirus testing. He rescinded these, too. Such efforts fed a primary challenge by McGeachin that received Donald Trump's support in November 2021.

As Little looked ahead to his reelection, his agenda was plenty conservative. He signed the state's largest-ever tax cut, plus an abortion ban and a "trigger" law, in the event that the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade; it took effect when the Supreme Court issued its Dobbs decision in the summer of 2022. Little also signed a bill allocating hundreds of millions of dollars for roads, bridges, and other infrastructure, and he vetoed a measure that would have banned businesses from requiring coronavirus vaccines, citing "government overreach into the private sector." The Legislature failed to override his veto.

The primary drew national attention. McGeachin mingled with members of the Three Percenter militia, but Little easily topped her in fundraising, and not even the Idaho GOP primary electorate was prepared to choose her vision over Little's pragmatic conservatism. He won almost 53 percent, well ahead of McGeachin's 32 percent and smaller totals from a few other candidates. In the three-way general election, Little took almost 61 percent to 20 percent for Democrat Stephen Heidt and 17 percent for Bundy, who was running as an independent. After losing four counties in his 2018 run, Little lost only one in 2022—Blaine County (Sun Valley), which accounted for less than 2 percent of the statewide vote.

After his reelection, Little faced a stream of conservative bills and mostly protected his right flank by signing them. He signed one bill banning gender-affirming care for transgender minors and one that required transgender students to use bathrooms of their sex assigned at birth; a measure that banned minors from traveling out of state for abortions without parental consent. Little also signed legislation permitting the execution of death row inmates by firing squad; and, in a shift, an end to workplace coronavirus vaccination requirements. Little signed bills to ban ranked-choice voting in the state and to remove school identification from the list of verifications allowed for voting. He signed legislation limiting schools' use of restraint and seclusion for discipline, responding to an investigation by the Idaho Statesman newspaper. The Legislature overrode Little's veto of a bipartisan property tax bill.

In 2024, Little delivered on a promise by signing a bill to invest $1.5 billion in new funding and $500 million in redirected funding to upgrade aging school facilities. More contentiously, he signed a bill similar to one he had previously vetoed that allowed parental lawsuits against libraries over material deemed harmful to minors, and he signed legislation prohibiting minors from undergoing rape kit exams without parental consent, which critics said would shield perpetrators of incest. Little signed a bill Democrats had long sought to require insurance companies to provide six months' worth of contraceptives at a time. Idaho also dealt with two notable U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2024. One lifted a lower-court ban on the state's law ending gender-affirming care for minors; the other required that Idaho hospitals provide abortions under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, at least for now.

In February 2025, Little signed a measure to enact a $50 million program to spend state funds on private school tuition, and the following month he signed a bill that banned school and government mask mandates to fight infectious diseases. He also signed first-in-the-nation legislation to make firing squads the primary method of carrying out the death penalty. In March 2025, he signed a bill calling for work requirements for Medicaid while allowing Medicaid recipients to access certain tax credits; he also signed legislation to deregulate child care centers amid a shortage of child care options. In April 2025, he signed legislation barring immigrants without legal status from receiving public assistance.

Little could run again in 2026, though Labrador, now attorney general, could pose a strong Republican challenge if he also runs.

 

Almanac chapter 1: Idaho

For some years, I've helped out in a peripheral way with the editing of Idaho and Oregon sections the Almanac of American Politics, the top single-volume reference book on that subject. A few months before publication, they send some of the text from the upcoming edition, and I post it here. Here's one of four sections from the book. Enjoy. - rs

For more than five decades, the Almanac of American Politics has set the standard for political reference books. In September, the Almanac will be publishing its 2026 edition, with more than 2,000 pages offering fully updated chapters on all 435 House members and their districts, all 100 senators, all 50 states and governors, and much more.

Below are excerpts from the new chapters in the 2026 Almanac on the state of Idaho / Oregon and Gov. Brad Little / Tina Kotek, written by Louis Jacobson. Jacobson — a senior correspondent for PolitiFact, a senior columnist for Sabato's Crystal Ball at the University of Virginia Center for Politics, and a contributor of political coverage for U.S. News & World Report — has written for eight editions of the Almanac since 2000. For the 2026 edition, he served as chief author.

Readers can receive a 15% discount if they purchase the new Almanac at its website and use the code Ridenbaugh2026 at checkout.

---

The population of Idaho—tucked near the continental United States' northwest edge, far from any major metro area—has nearly doubled since 1990. But the migration of newcomers to both livable Boise and resort areas such as Sun Valley hasn't added many Democrats: Idaho has remained solidly Republican for more than a half-century, although the GOP is increasingly divided between an establishment wing and the far right.

Idaho was the last North American area on which European fur traders set eyes. Then in the 1840s, New England Yankees, led by ministers, made their way west on the Oregon Trail through southern Idaho. The state's northern panhandle, an extension of Washington's Columbia River Valley, saw its first white settlement when miners came seeking gold and silver; white loggers seeking timber followed. Mormons moving north from Utah settled in the state's eastern part, while Basque immigrants and their descendants significantly influenced Idaho and its politics. Federal water reclamation projects first authorized in 1894 attracted the most settlers, producing inexpensive hydroelectric power. Today, Idaho ranks fifth in the U.S. for percentage of energy generation that is renewable Idaho Power has said it will use fully clean sources of energy by 2045, thanks partly to its 17 Snake River hydroelectric plants. Wind power accounts for about 16 percent of the state's electricity generation, though several counties have moved to limit or ban on solar and wind energy production, and on his first day of his second term, Donald Trump moved to temporarily block a large-scale wind farm, the Lava Ridge Wind Project. Meanwhile, the Idaho National Laboratory in Idaho Falls expects to deploy its first portable nuclear microreactor by 2026, with the aim of replacing diesel power for isolated communities.

Cheap water power transformed the barren Snake River Valley into some of the nation's best volcanic, soil-enriched farmland, which along with warm days and cool nights proved ideal for the Burbank russet potato. In 1953, an eighth-grade dropout named J.R. Simplot perfected the process of freezing french fries; with a handshake, he sealed a contract with a little restaurant chain called McDonald's and was on his way to becoming the world's biggest potato processor. Today, Idaho ranks sixth in the nation for the percentage of state gross domestic product coming from agriculture, and since 1997, agricultural GDP has expanded by 2.9 times in Idaho, compared with 2.5 times for the nation as a whole. Idaho ranks first nationally in potatoes and barley, third in sugar beets and second in hops, the latter contributing to a thriving microbrewery industry. Idaho also ranks No. 4 in dairy sales; the state's dairy receipts are now 2.6 times as large as that for potatoes. Chobani has a large yogurt plant in Twin Falls that has been a major driver of economic growth in south central Idaho.

The state is big: The town of Montpelier in the southeast is closer to Farmington, New Mexico, than to Bonners Ferry in the northern panhandle. And the wilderness is never far away. Towering over the state Capitol in Boise is the vast peak of Shafer Butte. Not far away are the sharp peaks and broad valleys of the Sawtooth range; the impassable mountains of the Frank Church-River of No Return Wilderness, the largest U.S. wilderness area outside Alaska; and the 425 miles of the Salmon River. Having so much wilderness comes with a downside; according to the Environmental Protection Agency, nearly 1 percent of the land in Idaho on average has burned annually since 1984, a pattern that is projected to worsen in the coming years because of climate change. Wildfires have contributed to poor air quality. Three Idaho areas—Boise, plus the regions in Idaho adjoining Logan Utah, and Spokane Washington—rank in the American Lung Association's list of top 25 nationally for short-term particle pollution.

In recent years, Idaho has been at or near the top of state rankings for patents per capita, a tradition that reaches back into the early years of the 20th century, when a Mormon farm boy from Rigby named Philo T. Farnsworth came up with many of the concepts that laid the basis for the invention of television. In the 1970s, potato magnate Simplot traded one type of chip for another, becoming the primary financier of a startup called Micron Technology, which, along with Hewlett-Packard, spawned a booming high-tech sector. Micron is undergoing a $15 billion expansion of its campus southeast of Boise to build new chip manufacturing capacity, bolstered by $6.14 billion in federal CHIPS and Science Act funding. Nearby, Meta is building an $800 million data center. Not to be left out, food processor Lamb Weston is expanding a plant in American Falls that can produce more than 1.1 million pounds of french fries per day. Compared with the eve of the pandemic, average wages in Idaho have risen by 36 percent, well above the national rate of 23 percent, and although wages are lower in Idaho, so is the cost of living. The state's construction boom has prompted some worry about the availability of construction labor, particularly if Trump fulfills his promise to deport illegal immigrants en masse. The dairy industry has expressed concern about that prospect, too. Meanwhile, another tech company, Intuit, said that it was closing a campus near Boise, cutting 1,800 workers.

The combination of technology jobs and natural beauty has driven the state's population growth. Idaho led the country in the percentage of population growth from 2017 through 2021, and is still in the top five. If rapid growth continues, Idaho could gain a third House seat after the 2030 Census—the first time in its history. Today, 42 percent of Idahoans live in the Treasure Valley around Boise; population in Ada County, which includes Boise, has grown by 34 percent since 2010, fueled by such amenities as the 200-mile-long Ridge to Rivers trail system. Between 2020 and 2021, three suburbs of Boise—Meridian, Caldwell, and Nampa—ranked among the country's top 15 fastest-growing cities or towns. Other areas have grown, too, especially those attracting a wealthy clientele. Blaine County, which includes the resort of Sun Valley, has grown by 17 percent since 2010, and Teton County, a bedroom community for pricey Jackson Hole, Wyoming, has grown by 23 percent over the same period. In fast-growing areas, traffic and high housing prices have followed the brewpubs and farm-to-table restaurants. But most of Idaho's counties have seen little population change in the past half-century.

Hispanic residents account for 14 percent of the state's population, and Idaho has welcomed not only Americans from other states but also people from abroad, including refugees. The state has absorbed more than 20,000 refugees since the 1970s, mostly in Boise and Twin Falls—first Vietnamese and Cambodians, then Bosnians, and more recently refugees from Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, Congo, Eritrea, Nepal and Iran. The Mormon population, concentrated in the state's south, may be a reason for its tolerant streak, given its international missionary outreach: Idaho has the second highest percentage of Mormons of any state.

In its early years as a silver-producing state, Idaho backed populism and opposed the gold standard; from statehood up to 1990, the state cycled between periods of Republican dominance and partisan competitiveness. But since 1990, Idaho has become staunchly Republican. The U.S. government owns 63 percent of Idaho's land, and many Idahoans strongly oppose federal policies that limit road building and grazing on public lands, and they don't like the idea of breaching Snake River dams to protect salmon (in the process, depriving potato farmers of water). Since 1964, no Democratic presidential nominee has won more than 37 percent of the vote. Idaho has elected only Republicans to the governorship since 1994 and to the Senate since 1978. With one exception in 2008, the GOP has won every election for Idaho's two House seats since 1994.

Boise has become solidly blue: Its state legislators are all Democratic and they tend to win in landslides. But step a mile outside city limits and the political tenor changes. Influxes of upscale professionals and minorities have been balanced by the migration of retirees, as well as more conservative engineers and entrepreneurs who have come from California and other states for a fresh environment and a fresh start—and fewer regulations. Meanwhile, the northern panhandle has a history as a hotbed for extremist activity. In the 1970s, the white supremacist Aryan Nations was based around Coeur d'Alene, northern Idaho's largest population center; it was eventually forced out. The Ruby Ridge standoff between U.S. Marshals and a far-right family played out a bit further north in 1992, and 31 white nationalists affiliated with the Patriot Front were arrested in 2022 on charges of conspiracy to riot at a Coeur d'Alene LGBTQ+ pride event in 2022. The coronavirus pandemic exacerbated fault lines in the state, as a vocal segment of rural conservatives rebelled against public health restrictions imposed by the more pragmatic Republican governor, Brad Little. The party's right wing has an ideological enforcer, the Idaho Freedom Foundation, and has sometimes made common cause with the John Birch Society, which won a unanimous endorsement from the Republican central committee of Kootenai County (Coeur d'Alene). Some activists mounted armed protests at local officials' offices and homes. The GOP's internal divisions played out in primaries in 2022, with establishment Republicans generally prevailing. But regardless of which wing of the Republican nominee came from, Democrats took no more than 37 percent in any major race.