|
STATE
NEWS
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
District of Columbia
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
International
|
|
|
|
|
HI • Maui 'budgets up' for land/water condemnation
JUNE 2, 2006 | The budget passed on June 1 by the county of Maui
includes about $7 million for appraising and obtaining - by sale or
condemnation - a valuable chunk of land whose prime assets include an
important supply of fresh running water.
The land occupies about
13,000 acres of the small island. It was previously owned by the
Wailuku Water Company, which in an earlier incarnation was known as
the Wailuku Agribusiness Company. Mayor Alan Arakawa said the effort
could roughly double the amount of drinking water available to
residents on the island.
The company, in its various forms, has owned the property for about a century, and has water-related state administrative proceedings underway;
it has declined to address news reporters questions. Critics have
questioned whether the company is planning to engage in water banking
and attempting to sell the water. They suggest that would be legally
questionable, since water in Hawaii is considered a public trust.
|
Notes
from all over
TAKING
ON THE MEXICO CITY FORUM A guest
opinion in the Cook County News Herald of Grand Marais,
Minnesota, blasted the approach taken at the March Fourth World
Water Forum in Mexico City which equated water rights with human
rights.
"After
the first day of the meeting, however, it became clear that the
government and corporate agents were only interested in turning
water management into a business opportunity, whereupon the NGOs
and activists established an alternative forum intent on identifying
access to clean water as a fundamental right . . . If we accept
the position that water is a common good, and an inalienable right
shared by all people, does that mean that folks in China or France
have as much right to Lake Superior’s water as we do?
Perhaps we would be better served if we didn’t use the concept
of human rights to justify our control of Lake Superior’s water,
but rather, focused on Cibber’s observation that possession
is eleven points in the law."
|
|