Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts published in December 2022

When privacy does not apply

malloy

According to the Idaho Capital Sun, Idaho Congressman Mike Simpson underwent surgery recently and will be out until after the new year. He gave his proxy to his counterpart in the First District, Congressman Russ Fulcher.

Thank goodness, all is well for the longtime congressman. “He is doing great and will be back in D.C. fully ready to vote on Jan. 3 for the start of the new Congress,” said Julia Horman, Simpson’s press secretary.

It’s not much of a story, and there’s certainly nothing wrong with Simpson getting surgery. But there’s plenty wrong with how his office handled it. The breaking of the story should have come from his office, and not the Capital Sun.

There’s no reason for the secrecy. If you live beyond 70 (Simpson is the same age as me, 72), body parts will need adjusting. I know people who have had knees, hips, shoulders and even hearts replaced. Many of these procedures are relatively routine by today’s standards, and people come back as good as new. Judging from his press secretary’s statement, it doesn’t appear that Simpson will be an exception.

Perhaps Simpson, and his office staff, would prefer to keep this private. But a congressman’s health status is in the public’s interest – whether it’s something serious such as a stroke or heart attack, or something routine. His constituents deserve to know if he is going to be out for any length of time, and who is casting votes on his behalf.

A few days ago, when Simpson’s surgery was not made public, I received a call from someone who talked about a number of horrible possibilities regarding to Simpson’s health – which is how ugly rumors get started. It would have been nice to counter that his office had sent out a news release indicating that Simpson was undergoing routine surgery and that everything was fine.

His office gatekeepers blew this one.

Simpson is such a huge figure in the history of Idaho politics. Some 20 years ago, when I was writing editorials with the Idaho Statesman, I asked Simpson why voters should elect him to another term. He gave one of the best answers ever.

“Because I’m damn good,” Simpson told the editorial board. We all just about fell out of our chairs with laughter. But, joking aside, he was damn good – insightful and funny, and a great one to interview.

Over the years, he has been good enough to keep winning elections while rising in the ranks of the Appropriations Committee – one of the most powerful committees in Congress for his constituency in the Second District. He was exceptional during his early days in Congress, when he made a point of building relationships with colleagues on both sides of the aisle. As a state legislator, he was a prime source for Statehouse reporters, including myself.

I remember a comment that the late Rep. James “Doc” Lucas, one of the great characters in Idaho politics, made about Simpson many years ago. “There ain’t no substitute for intelligence.”

Old Doc was right. Simpson was maybe the brightest bulb in the Legislature at the time, and I’d guess that he’s one of the smartest people in Congress today. What’s refreshing about him is his independence – he doesn’t always go along with the party line. He was the lead player in wilderness designation for the Boulder White Clouds, and is probably the only Republican in Idaho who can win an election by being friendly to dam breaching. More recently, he was the only member in Idaho’s delegation to vote for the Respect of Marriage Act, and one of only 39 House Republicans.

Ironically, the marriage act was sponsored in the Senate by someone else with an independent streak – Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, who recently left the Democratic Party to become an independent.

There’s no question about it, Simpson has guts, but he’s not so much in the public eye these days. Media access to him is limited, he avoids contentious town halls and he refused to debate his opponents in the primary and general election campaigns. We didn’t hear as much from Simpson as we could have.

But to his credit, Simpson keeps on winning and he’ll probably have the job for as long as he wants. Who cares about anything else?

ctmalloy@outlook. Chuck Malloy is a long-time Idaho journalist and columnist. He may be reached at ctmalloy@outlook.com

 

Sorta

rainey

O.K.. We have a Congress. Sorta.

If you mean 435 butts in their seats in the House and 100 more in the Senate furniture, yeah, we got us a Congress. Took awhile. But, we got one.

Took a long time. With several dust-ups in a few places. We suffered through the embarrassment of the Walker candidacy. We watched all of Trump's political wannabees bite the dust. We held our collective breaths for the Secretary of State races as, one after the other, election deniers were stopped in their tracks.

Yeah. We got a Congress. Now, what?

Most candidacies dealt with reality. Facts. A lot of 'em blew Trump-smoke of denialism and lies. Fortunately, their misbegotten lots are now, for the most part, memories. But, memories we shouldn't forget.

The question is, once these folks swear in come January, will they get anything done? Will the exercise of our efforts at the polls be fruitful or will we get the same old divisions? And stalemate.

Every so often, one of our national pols does something to infuriate the electorate. The most recent, Senator Krysten Sinema who, after the election dust settled, said she was no longer a Democrat. Nuthin' new there. She hasn't been a Democrat since the day she was sworn in four years ago. Just ask Arizona Democrats.

While her announcement was full of soft, pleasing sentiments, the truth is, she's watching out for her own butt. After reading angry tea leaves on the home front and a mailbag full of denouncements of her D.C. activities, she figured if she ran as an Independent in 2024, she could muster enough Republican votes to survive.

I doubt it. We'll see. Her exit - stage right - wasn't met with happy faces on the Hill. Democrats had a clear 51-49 majority before she opened her mouth. Now, they're back to 50-50, given her erratic behavior thus far.

Current Independents Angus King and Bernie Sanders seemed less than welcoming in their comments after Sinema's announcement. Especially Sanders. She may now be a Senator without a friend.

On the House side of things, we have the dishonorable Kevin McCarthy shouting from the housetops that he's going to be the next Speaker of the House. He's already named committee heads and filled out rosters of member assignments. He's measured the drapes and drawn up floor plans for furniture.

I've never seen a politician so coveting of a promotion. But, there he is. Telling everybody. Problem is, he, so far, hasn't been able to round up the 218 votes needed to be elected Speaker. Not able to get the commitments. Seems there are those 40 angry members of the House euphemistically called the "freedom caucus." So, McCarthy hasn't got the votes he needs for the Speakership. Well, well.

Can you imagine the bargaining going on. Horse trading, if you will. Those committee chairmanships. Preferential assignments proffered. Ol' Kevin has his back to the wall. Suddenly, you may see some new, unfamiliar faces in "leadership."

Another thing. Ol' Kevin doesn't appear to have any idea of the job description. Just "giving orders" is not the prime requirement. He doesn't appear to have any idea how the job works, i.e. bridging arguing factions, decorum and so on.

A more diligent, effective Congress? Hardly.

Yes, we have a Congress. Sorta.

 

The Jekyll/Hyde party

jones

The serious split in the personality of the present-day GOP in Idaho was demonstrated in two articles that recently appeared in the media.

The Kootenai County Republican Central Committee (KCRCC), savoring its evil Mr. Hyde persona, announced on December 8 that U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) would keynote its Lincoln Day Dinner in February. The very next day, Rep. Mike Simpson evoked the good Dr. Jekyll when explaining his vote for the Respect for Marriage Act.

The idea that the KCRCC would so horrendously insult the legacy of the father of the Republican Party by inviting his exact opposite to speak at an event bearing his name is hard to fathom. Where Abe Lincoln stood tall for unity, dignity and American values, Rep. Greene stands for insurrection, white nationalism and QAnon conspiracies. She will bring disgrace to the Gem State by her very presence, but she will be among kindred spirits at the Coeur d’Alene event.

The KCRCC, which is commanded by John Birchers and Idaho Freedom Foundation functionaries, speaks for a significant, but extremely vocal, minority of today’s Republican faithful. It carries great weight in the area, whether working to destroy North Idaho College, hamstring primary and secondary education or create havoc with fake culture war issues. It and its counterparts across the State have managed to capture an outsized share of the Party apparatus and they are intent on total control.

Mike Simpson is representative of the other branch of the Party, someone who rose through the ranks of the GOP as a pragmatist with traditional Republican values but the ability to work across the aisle. I met Mike in 1984, when I was Attorney General and he was running for the Idaho Legislature. Governor John Evans and I were working furiously that year to help elect legislators in our respective parties who would support our joint effort to keep Idaho Power from controlling the Snake River. I supported Mike because he was favorable to that cause. He proved to be an exceptional legislator.

Mike was elected to Congress in 1998 and has been the only member of Idaho’s Congressional delegation to actually be a leader–to stick his head out from time to time when he feels strongly about an issue. He worked hard to establish the Cecil D. Andrus-White Clouds Wilderness, despite strong opposition from many in the GOP. He proposed a bold plan to save Idaho’s anadromous fish runs, despite vociferous, but false, claims that it would harm Idaho’s water interests. He voted to certify President Biden’s election, but it should be mentioned that both Idaho Senators did likewise. And, he was the only one in the delegation to support the Respect for Marriage Act.

On the other hand, he has made some infuriating votes and uttered some indefensible words, particularly during the Trump era. Still, if Idaho can look to anyone in the delegation to help lead the Republican Party back to a position of responsibility in the State–to play the good Dr. Jekyll role– he is the best bet in the delegation. Here at home, Governor Brad Little is the one we must look to in resisting the destructive Mr. Hyde role being played in Idaho politics by the likes of KCRCC and its counterparts across the Gem State. He has good instincts but needs to speak and act more firmly.

There is a civil war currently going on for the soul of the Republican Party in the State of Idaho and it will take strong leadership from both state and federal officeholders for the Dr. Jekyll side to prevail over the Mr. Hyde troublemakers. Idahoans should encourage Little and Simpson to speak out more forcefully for what is right and take the necessary action to accomplish it in order to make Idaho a true Gem of the United States.

 

Trying, trying again

stapiluslogo1

History has its uses, especially when it comes to sales tax exemptions.

The subject has come up for meaningful discussion again this season, and the point here is that, well, we’ve been here before.

That’s not a criticism, just an observation.

The pieces of the argument for the new (actually semi-recurring) proposal seem on their face so obvious that, well, of course it’ll pass.

First there’s the need for more money in a specific area: School building construction and maintenance. This is a matter of demographic mathematics: The number of school children in certain places in Idaho is growing, often dramatically, and there won’t be enough classrooms or schools for all of them, and many of the schools which are there are in need of repair and upgrades. The fix is fiendishly costly. There’s no real debate about any of this.

Earlier this year a state legislative committee was called into session to consider the situation. (A sensible move, since doing some of the preliminary information-gathering and pondering really is best done outside the regular session.) A number of ideas have been floated.

One of the most widely noted of those, proposed by attorney Robert Huntley (a former Supreme Court justice who has been working on the subject of school finance for decades), was described in one article this way: “It would generate around $1.2 billion per year by lowering the sales tax from 6% to 4%, and eliminating a large swath of exemptions from current tax code, according to Huntley. Essentially, the bill would lower the tax rate, but collect the tax against a broader base.”

Probably most Idaho residents would jump on this idea: You mean the sales tax I pay would fall by a third, and school construction and repair also would get the money it needs? What’s not to like? Is there a catch? No, not really, except …

Here’s where the history comes in.

The Idaho sales tax, at a 3% level, was passed by the legislature in 1965 and confirmed by the voters the next year, and right away the push began to exempt various sales from the tax. By the time I started covering the legislature in the seventies a thick, gooey surface of exemptions was already spread over the tax, and that layering was added to as time went on. Now Idaho has a whole library of exemptions and a 6% tax. And yes, it's a math equation: Reduce the number of exemptions and you could cut the tax rate, and still pull in the same amount of revenue. Or more.

The battle to reverse some of those exemptions - which range from widely acceptable to you’ve-got-to-be-kidding - was ongoing back in the seventies, as I can testify, and has cropped up every few years since.

Consider this quote: “In 1988, the Governor's Tax Study Committee expressed its concern about the growth of exemptions whether they were serving a public interest or just providing ‘favors to various special interest groups’. In 2003, that ‘concern’ was again addressed by a legislative task force that scrutinized exemptions. Despite the optimism expressed in several editorials around the state, substantive action did not follow.” That comes from a 2013 column by political scientist Jim Weatherby.

The following year, political writer Chuck Malloy offered: “the odds of winning the lottery probably are better than eliminating the sales tax exemptions. There is a strong constituency for every one of those exemptions. And there are lobbyists lined up to protect all of them. It would be easier to push for increases in the income and sales taxes than ending the exemptions. Eliminating exemptions would be a tax increase on the business world and business operators don’t like higher taxes any more than Republican legislators.”

The year after that, I wrote (in a column) this: “Over the 50 or so legislative sessions since, few have adjourned without some adjustment to the tax, generally by way of exempting someone or something. Lobbyists have kept busy in Boise on that front for decades.”

Is there reason to think 2023 will be any different? The nature of the incoming legislature doesn’t offer much cause.

But a new year is about to dawn, and nothing in politics is eternal; everything is changeable with time. But … even tax exemptions?

 

Punch line

schmidtlogo1

There’s gotta be a joke that fits this occasion, but I can’t come up with it. Maybe I will.

The Idaho Republican Legislature is not a punch line. It’s a simple fact. Nobody’s laughing. But we voters keep returning these jokers to the statehouse. Maybe us voters are the joke.

Six years ago, when the proposal came before the Idaho legislature to cap the homeowner exemption, there was good testimony that predicted where property taxes would be right now. A retired expert on taxes made some good graphs and analysis of the proposed law. He told the lawmakers that homeowners property taxes would start to climb, and commercial property taxpayers’ taxes would level off. And his analysis didn’t include dramatically rising home values. It just included a steady increase. So even if things had stayed the same, the local property tax burden was going to shift to homeowners. Well, home values did climb. In some places they have doubled in this short six years. Now, it seems, Idaho Republican legislators have decided there is a problem with property taxes. And they can’t seem to find the right solution.

Every Idaho Democratic legislator voted against this proposal six years ago. Less than a dozen Republican legislators joined them. I remember the Assistant Senate Majority Leader (now the Senate Pro Tem) even acknowledging in his debate there might be “some shift” in the coming years. But he argued this change was good for “business”. I guess not your or my business. Somebody got a break on this shenanigan, and it wasn’t Joe Homeowner. But Joe Homeowner probably votes Republican.

So now, with many suggestions brought up to fix these skyrocketing property taxes, the Idaho Republican legislature can’t seem to find the solution.

It’s not hidden. Why can’t they see it? It’s pretty obvious.

Okay, here’s the joke. I walk out to my old bicycle outside the Capitol to pedal home in the dark. Billy Republican is wandering around looking at the ground. “Can I help you?” I asked.

“I dropped my keys, and I can’t find them.” Billy says.

“Let me help” I say. After some minutes I can’t find anything either and I ask him. “Where did you drop them?”

“Over there”, he gestures to a darkened sidewalk.

“Why are we looking here?” I’m perplexed.

“The light is better over here.” Billy admits.

It’s hard to admit you made a mistake. It can seem very dark and foreboding to fess up. I have always found it a learning experience, not something to be avoided. I’ve made lots of mistakes in my life, in my votes, in my diagnoses, in my relationships. Admitting mistakes is a sign of character, not weakness. Even in a politician, though all the experts tell politicians to never make such a confession. They think we want to vote for infallible representatives. There is no such thing.

The Idaho Republican legislature made a mistake six years ago and we, the voters, have been paying the burden ever since. Property taxes have driven some fixed income elderly from their homes.

It’s past time when the Idaho Republican legislature should have fixed this. So now they are wringing their hands and scratching their heads about a solution. Solutions have been brought up for the past three years. They don’t get a hearing. I guess the Idaho Republican legislative leadership just wants to look in the comfort of a well-lit hallway and not really find the keys they say they lost.

In this case, Idaho Republican legislators did not lose anything. They
voted for this mess. Now they need to admit they made a mistake and man up to choose the simple solution. It’s in plain sight.

 

A tough new job

malloy

Here’s how a transition should work.

A day after Phil McGrane was elected as Idaho’s secretary of state, he had a friendly lunch with retiring Secretary of State Lawerence Denney and his chief deputy, Chad Houck. As McGrane observed, “I’m pretty sure we were the only ones that had lunch together.”

He’s probably right. It hasn’t been so smooth with Superintendent Sherri Ybarra and Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin, who celebrated their election defeats by handing out a series of big raises and bonuses – at taxpayer expense.

McGrane and Denney were not always best of pals. They were opponents eight years ago in the race for secretary of state, won by Denney, and it was a hard-fought campaign. But the two maintained a common goal, which was to ensure the integrity of Idaho elections. Denney was the lead elections officer for the state while McGrane served as the Ada County clerk. McGrane accepted the election results and he has had a constructive working relationship with Denney ever since.

Denney has made it a practice in his eight years not to endorse candidates in any race, so we didn’t hear about who he liked – or disliked – in the hotly contested primary election that featured McGrane, Rep. Dorothy Moon (now the state Republican Party chair) and Sen. Mary Souza. But when McGrane’s election became official in November (he ran with light opposition), Denney was “all in” for McGrane.

“Secretary Denney has gone out of his way to make this transition as smooth as possible for me,” McGrane said.

That’s a good thing, because McGrane needs all the support he can get – at a time when many people think that elections have the integrity of a Ponzi scheme. There are Idahoans who think that the 2020 presidential election was rigged against Donald Trump, and I imagine there are more than a few who back Trump’s call to upend the Constitution and put him back in power.

And this is a job that McGrane wanted? Absolutely. McGrane has been preparing for this job for a long time and he relishes the challenges that come with the job.

“I’ve had a good relationship over the years with the Legislature, but there are a lot of new folks this year and some were elected because they were not satisfied with elections. I look forward to working with them on building confidence in our elections and on policy issues,” McGrane said.

“We have a good elections system in our state,” he says. “Take a look at the post-election audits that were done recently as well as the ones done in May. I’ve been around this for a long time, but I was surprised that we had maybe a one-vote variance here and there from hundreds of thousands of votes. That shows how robust our system is.”

There are doubters, including the Idaho Freedom Foundation’s Wayne Hoffman, who says we should not blindly trust government officials who say that elections are sound. Sure, there was a mixup in District 26 (the Magic Valley) when it appeared initially that Democrat Karma Metzler Fitzgerald had won a House race. There was some confusion with election tabulations, and the victory went to Republican Jack Nelson.

On the positive side, the error was spotted and corrected without corruption or coverup. McGrane sees that matter as evidence that the election system is working.

Something that McGrane will need to deal with is fatigue among the county clerks, some of whom are fed up with the new level of pressures that go with the job. As a county clerk, McGrane can empathize with those who are seeing retirement as a good option.

“They need to know that they are not alone,” McGrane says. “One of the things I’d like added to the budget is a voting systems specialist who knows the systems inside and out and can provide answers to questions. One of the jobs of the secretary of state is to make sure what works in Ada County also works in Clark County.”

A secretary of state has other duties, including corporate filings, the filing of legislation and service on the state Land Board. One change is that his office will be open during the lunch hour, for the convenience of working people.

Ultimately, McGrane will be judged according to how elections are conducted in the Gem State. He has the expertise to do the job … we should wish him well.

ctmalloy@outlook. Chuck Malloy is a long-time Idaho journalist and columnist. He may be reached at ctmalloy@outlook.com. Correction: In last week’s column, I incorrectly identified the status of Idaho’s same-sex marriage laws. Same-sex marriage has been legal in Idaho since 2014.

 

Who knew?

rainey

I don't know who comes up with the names of various generations as the years pass. Never met anyone else who does, either.

But, we have "The Greatest Generation," "Boomers," "Millenials" "Gen Xers," Gen Zers," and so on. Every 30 years or so, we look back on a new group, a new name, move over and welcome them aboard. This process has been going on a long time. One bunch after the other. Normally, it's a smooth transition. Normally.

Now, there seems to be a schism developing between Boomers and Millennials in some areas. Just a little distance, one from the other. And, it's growing

Barb and I have some experience with generational differences. Living in a 55+ community in Arizona, we had more than 50 clubs. Just about everything you could name had at least one club. Auto repair, Olympic swimming, pickleball, several for those playing bridge (or any game), woodworking, quilting, fencing and on and on.

Some, like woodworking and auto repair, enjoyed large buildings with the very best equipment money could buy. Hundreds of thousands of dollars invested. Quilting clubs with large meeting places. Weavers and their looms. Photography. All costly. All first class!

Then, along came the Boomers. A new generation starting to retire. Lots and lots of Boomers who, we figured, would join the existing plethora of clubs and activities. "Something for everyone" we thought.

But, NO! Boomers, we learned, are "special." If most wanted to join a club, it would be one they would create and occupy. The older folks, with clubs offering "something for everyone," just "wouldn't work for Boomers."

So, there's been a lot of duplication. Double a lot of everything. And, as older residents have died out or moved away, the existing clubs with beautiful existing facilities have begun to wither a bit. But, Boomers are thriving. At least for now.

So, we're told, it seems, "Boomers are where the action is." But, wait! Hold your horses! The Millennial generation has arrived. Those "kids" have reached retirement age. So, guess what. They don't want to join the Boomers in anything. And, I mean anything!

Millennials, it seems, don't want to do woodworking. They've got no use for face-to-face bridge playing. Or poker clubs. Or sewing groups. Or chess clubs. And, horror of horrors, they don't play golf! Fact is, the city of Glendale, Arizona, closed one municipal course because of declining revenue. Built houses on it.

For Millenials, there's no need to "waste" five or six hours at the links. No. They can play 18-holes on their iPads or smart phones and be done in less than 20-minutes.

Millennials can play bridge on their fancy gadgets. They can play chess around the world. Poker, too. Just about any activity you can name can be successfully played - or created - on their computer-oriented devices. No need for fancy club buildings. Or, auto repair equipment. No need for in-person bridge clubs or their bridge rooms.

Millennials, after all, are the first generation to grow up from birth with computers. Some were playing electronic games at about the same time they learned to walk. They went to computer equipped- schools, formed faceless groups of friends, preferred texting to calling, learned from the cradle to tap keys.

Now, guess what. Now, the Boomers are seeing their own duplicate groups and clubs beginning to thin out. Some Boomers are dying off. Some moving elsewhere. Boomers, it seems, are beginning to be the "older" generation in the retirement villages.

So, what's going to happen to all those clubs? All those buildings filled with state-of-the-art expensive equipment? And, most of all, what's going to happen to all those golf courses that have lured retirees to Arizona, New Mexico, Southern California and other warm climes for - careful now - for generations?

Maybe - just maybe - we've reached a generational turning point. Those of us who had to learn about computers in our 40's, 50's and 60's are disappearing. We're being replaced by "youngsters"at the same ages who are "computerized." From birth!

What lies ahead for hundreds of 55+ retirement communities in several states will be very different. Nearly all were designed around golf courses. Nearly all have been run by thousands and thousands of volunteers.

But, Millennials aren't golfers. And, as they've already proven, they don't volunteer. Oh, they'll write a check or two. They don't mind paying for someone else to do the work. But, they won't be the "heartbeat" of these communities that's made them so successful. The volunteers and club-joiners who've been the driving forces.

Millennials, and the following generations, are going to retire later, they'll be older and, as already exhibited. They'll want someone else to do the many, many chores volunteers have traditionally done to make the Sun Cities of the world - and a lot of others - successful.

Boomers are starting to fade. Millennials, Gen-Xers, Gen Zers and more are coming. Whoever names the generations better sharpen that pencil - er - computer.

The times - they are a changin'. Again.

 

A debt of gratitude

jones

Attorney General Lawrence Wasden will be stepping down at the end of the year, after providing 33 years of dedicated service in the AG’s office. I hired Lawrence in 1989 to perform legal work for the State Tax Commission. He worked his way up in the AG’s office until he was elected as Attorney General in 2002. His 20 years in that office makes him the longest-serving AG in Idaho history. Much more important than that, he was one of the very best–a man deeply committed to the rule of law.

An Attorney General must shun personal considerations and provide sound, even-handed legal advice and representation to state officials and agencies. The law requires no less. There is no leeway for favoring your friends or party when the law stands in the way. Lawrence characterized his work as honestly “calling the balls and strikes” and he routinely put the interests of the people above his own.

Lawrence stood strong in demanding that the US Department of Energy honor its contractual commitments to clean up nuclear waste at the Idaho National Laboratory, even as he supported the mission of the INL. After all, the contract was the DOE’s word and bond. Lawrence understood that he would take a great deal of heat for doing the right thing and he most certainly did, but he prevailed.

When the Legislature tried to give favorable treatment to users of state endowment lands, Lawrence stood by the constitutional requirement to obtain the “maximum long term financial return” from those lands. He successfully sued to overturn a statute that violated the Constitution, infuriating many legislators and land users. He knew that his political fortunes would suffer, but he valued the rule of law over political expediency.

When the Texas Attorney General sought to overturn the outcome of the 2020 presidential election with an action filed in the US Supreme Court on December 7, 2020, Lawrence declined to join the other Idaho officials who swarmed like lemmings to support that unconstitutional action. He understood the action was unsupported by any facts or law and was dangerous to our democracy. He also understood that by doing the right thing, he was subjecting himself to serious jeopardy in the next Republican primary election. As a measure of the man, Lawrence chose the constitutional course.

These are just a few examples of the dedicated service Lawrence Wasden performed for the people of Idaho. I did not always agree with the positions that Lawrence took on legal issues, but he always presented a sound legal argument for his position. You can respect a person who comes to a different conclusion on a debatable legal issue if they demonstrate their position has sound legal footing. We see too little of that in today’s poisonous political atmosphere, where politics too often trumps the law.

Perhaps no tribute to Attorney General Wasden could surpass the accolades heaped on him by Idaho’s six previous Attorneys General in a resolution I presented to the Conference of Western Attorneys General at its Sun Valley meeting on June 13, 2022:

“With our collective 32 years of service in the position, we can recognize an Attorney General who excels. Lawrence Wasden has courageously represented the State of Idaho and its people and will be remembered as one of our very best Attorneys General. Our sincere thanks and congratulations to Lawrence and his wife and partner Tracey for their dedicated service to the Gem State and best wishes for the future.”

Hear, hear, Lawrence!

 

Book report

stapiluslogo1

What follows are some reflections on 10 of the books I read for the first time this year - not necessarily the 10 best, or those I enjoyed most (though I recommend all on both counts) but the 10 that left the strongest impression, that drew my attention back weeks and months after I first consumed them. Not all are new, though some were, but they all were new to me this year. Collectively, they made up for me some of the better parts of 2022. This was, if nothing else, another good year (as I said too last year) to kick back and read.

They're listed here in alphabetical order (by author name), not preferential ranking, which would be too problematic for books as different as these.

Corban Addison - Wastelands: The True Story of Farm Country on Trial (2022). You could fairly argue that this book is slanted: It takes the side of the plaintiffs in a case of industrial pollution, and you're not put in much doubt about who to root for here. But the breadth of the case and the reasons for people standing where they do is amply explored. And more than that, and what sticks with you, is the awfulness of what a while lot of people in one region of eastern North Carolina were made to experience, for decades, as a result of the industrial practices of the hog industry in their area. Really, the book makes a solid case that the sides here are not morally equal at all.

Ron Chernow - Washington: A Life (2010). I picked up two big and excellent historical-biography books this year super-cheap at the used bookstore at the Salem Public Library, but for variety's sake I didn't choose to list both. Doris Kearns Goodwin's The Bully Pulpit (2012), about Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft and the muckrakers, was enjoyable, enlightening and intriguing in its its interweaving multi-biographical approach to showing how a long-festering set of subtle conflicts improbably developed (and reshaped the nation). I strongly recommend it. I narrowly give the edge in this lane though to Chernow's Washington, if just because his carefully constructed take on the man as a human being - with great strengths and flaws both - was such a refreshing look at the founders. (Even if, I think, a tad ungenerous to Jefferson.)

Kristin Kobes Du Mez - Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation (2020). To people who are looking for more insight into how we got where we are politically in this country, I may have recommended this book more often than any other in the last year - not as gospel but as a way of thinking about why the evangelical right is the way it is. The Amazon description says in part, "Many of today’s evangelicals might not be theologically astute, but they know their VeggieTales, they’ve read John Eldredge’s Wild at Heart, and they learned about purity before they learned about sex—and they have a silver ring to prove it. Evangelical books, films, music, clothing, and merchandise shape the beliefs of millions. And evangelical culture is teeming with muscular heroes—mythical warriors and rugged soldiers, men like Oliver North, Ronald Reagan, Mel Gibson, and the Duck Dynasty clan, who assert white masculine power in defense of 'Christian America.' Chief among these evangelical legends is John Wayne, an icon of a lost time when men were uncowed by political correctness, unafraid to tell it like it was, and did what needed to be done." There's a lot to unpack here, and while I wouldn't argue for every piece of it, this book better explains what we're seeing in this area than any academic study I've yet seen.

Stephen Kotkin - Stalin: Volume I: Paradoxes of Power, 1878-1928 (2014). If you're in the crowd of people waiting for Robert Caro to finally deliver his long-promised Lyndon Johnson finale, you might while waiting give this a try - and find a more engaging, albeit often dark, story than you might have expected. In common with many big historical figures, Stalin is often seen in monochrome and outside of his context (which see, to some extent, Washington), and by sketching in with fine-grain detail the life and surroundings of Stalin, we get a far different view of him and his world than we (or at least, I) have been accustomed to. Not a more favorable one: He still seems like a monster (there is no whitewash of his awfulness here), albeit than his major monstrosities happened after this segment of his life, which more closely covered his surprising political cunning (somewhat reminiscent in that regard of Johnson). It's something of a mind-bender of a book. And the research effort behind it is staggering. Volume 2 is on my reading list for this year; you can handle only so much Stalin at a time.

Stephen Markley - Ohio (2018). Only a few fiction books this year really grabbed me, and this was one, drawn out of the current world of younger people maneuvering through unstructured lives and a broken society, some of it (not all) blasted by opioids and other social problems. It's alternatively been called a "masterpiece" (by National Public Radio), which is a stretch, and been criticized for characters who sometimes seem a little too dopey. But it reads in aggregate like an accurate mirror held up to a too-large part of American life as it is now. It is, a little like Jesus and John Wayne, not a book to take to heart as gospel, but offering a lot to think about.

Mike Rothschild - The Storm is Upon Us: How QAnon Became a Movement, Cult, and Conspiracy Theory of Everything (2022). A basic field guide to one of the foremost conveyors of insanity in America today. I've read any number of articles and books with descriptions of the Q-Anon madness, what it is, where it came from and how to deal with it, but this one most effectively puts the pieces together, and best explains why it has had the appeal and impact we've seen. In the telling, there are some useful suggestions about where we might go from here.

Eric Silberstein - The Insecure Mind of Sergei Kraev (2021). I didn't read a lot of dystopian sci-fi this year (and a couple of others were simply disappointingly implausible), but when I did ... well, this one was the most entertaining and most provocative by far. Its premise kicks off with the serious current problem of disinformation delivered by our global electronic information network, and extends the speculation over that and related subjects to what might happen if we go too far in the wrong directions in trying to combat it - and that destination might not be where you imagine. Concerned as I am about the disinformation that's been swamping us in recent years, this book did convince me we need to be careful in how we try to cope with it.

Leah Sottile - When the Moon Turns to Blood: Lori Vallow, Chad Daybell, and a Story of Murder, Wild Faith, and End Times (2022). This book wouldn't be here - and I might not have read it - if it were just about the true crime case that has gotten more headline in Idaho than any other in recent years. (I would say it's the Northwest nonfiction book of the year.) But it is much more than that: This mainly is about what happens when boredom and the desire to become Important get out of control, a fantasy better suited to a video game becomes a person's perceived reality, and really terrible results ensue. It becomes a thoroughly engrossing, compelling story that sounds all too much like central elements in our present day politics.

Guido Tonelli - Genesis: The Story of How Everything Began (2021). One of the subtitles in the book is, "abandon prejudice, all ye who enter here," and that's just about right; this was by science mind-twister of the year. Written by an Italian physicist well immersed in recent quantum physics, this is a speculative guide going all the way back - all the way - and what we might find if we look hard enough. One reviewer said "You will find poetry here, and a strong sense of wonder and awe." I wouldn't disagree.

Barbara Walter - How Civil Wars Start: And How to Stop Them (2022). Of the books on this list, probably none got more general national attention than this one, and with none do I probably have larger bones to pick. (I wonder what she thought of the mid-terms.) And yet, it's an essential read. The book's premise, amply developed, is that America has been drifting away from stable democracy and toward an anocracy, a condition in which our social order as we've known it isn't exactly gone but is shaky. I think (but then ring me up as an optimist) that we're not quite as far gone as she makes out (she was writing in the Trump years, after all) and her definition of what constitutes a civil war is more expansive than mine. That said, she makes excellent points about some bad directions we've been heading (see some of the other books on this list for more about some of these) and the comparisons with how other countries historically have devolved into disorder makes for sobering and gripping reading. Even if you disagree with pieces of what she has to say, this is an essential part of today's public affairs literature - for good reason.