Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts published in November 2022

The power grab

 

Commentary about an Idaho ballot issue from Ben Ysursa, Bruce Newcomb and Jim Jones.

The three of us participated in one or more of the three branches of Idaho’s government for decades and, as they say, we have “seen it all.” Well, except a legislative power grab so brazen as Senate Joint Resolution 102 (SJR 102), which would allow the Legislature to call itself into special session upon the request of 60% of the members of each House.

The special session could only consider the “subjects” listed in the request petition, but it is not hard to envision how that would work. Legislators wanting to get some favorable publicity in an election year would start a petition to meet on their favored “subjects,” a rather inclusive word. If the petition listed “taxes,” the special session could consider proposals throughout the State's voluminous tax code. Other legislators might say they would sign the petition only if the subject of “healthcare” or “education” or whatever else was to be considered. In other words, getting the required 60% could entail listing practically every subject under the sun.

A special session called by the Governor under our Constitution can only last a maximum of 20 days. The special session he recently called lasted just one day. A special session called by the Legislature under SJR 102 could last for days, weeks or months, opening up the possibility of a full-time Idaho Legislature.

The Idaho Legislature conducted a test-run of their idea last year. In clear violation of the Idaho Constitution, which allows only the Governor to call a special session, the House simply refused to say it had concluded business and claimed it could remain in session until the end of the year. First, if it really does have such power already, why does it need SJR 102? Second, look at the fiasco that occurred when it did reconvene in November for no good reason. The House saw the introduction of 29 bills, none of which made it through the legislative process. It was merely political theater, which wasted $100,000 of taxpayer money.

When Idaho’s constitutional framers were meeting in Boise in 1889, they were not certain how often the Legislature should meet to consider State business. They were wary of having the body in session more than absolutely necessary. Some proposed the Legislature meet every other year, while others contended every third year would suffice. Some even thought every fourth year would be enough. The framers decided to try every other year, figuring they could always go to triennial sessions if that was too often. They provided for the Governor to call special sessions in case an emergency arose between sessions. In 1968, legislators convinced voters to approve a constitutional amendment providing for annual sessions.

Granting the Governor the exclusive right to call special sessions was one element of the concept of governmental checks and balances, which was of paramount importance to the framers. They would not have dreamed of giving the Legislature the power to call itself into session. The Legislature demonstrated the folly of that idea with its shameful, wasteful rump session last year. There was absolutely no emergency to be dealt with. Many just wanted to use the gathering to snipe at the Governor for measures taken earlier to combat the pandemic. Most all of those measures had lapsed by the time the session was held in violation of the Constitution.

The Legislature has become dysfunctional in recent years, choosing to devote much of its time to tilting with meaningless culture war windmills. Important concerns of the voters–like providing for construction and maintenance of public school facilities which the Constitution requires the State to do, or providing property tax relief to homeowners–are neglected. Approval of SJR 102 would only add to the problem of legislative malfeasance.

Please vote NO on SJR 102.

Ben Ysursa served as Idaho Secretary of State from 2003 to 2015. He served as Deputy in the office from 1974 to 1976 and as Chief Deputy from 1976 to 2002.

Bruce Newcomb served 20 years in the Idaho House of Representatives (1996 through 2006) and was Speaker of the House for 8 years (1999 through 2006).

Jim Jones served 8 years as Idaho Attorney General (1983-1991) and 12 years as a Justice on the Idaho Supreme Court (2005-2017).

 

The killing field

rainey

America is a powder keg awaiting just the right “strike of a match.”

Our President lives in a large white house surrounded by tall fencing, with armed missiles and men with machine guns. Certain members of Congress and our Supreme Court justices have bodyguards 24/7 and travel in armored vehicles. Mayors and city council Presidents in many large cities do, too. At work and at home.

Many states - including my own - have laws permitting armed citizens with no requirements for training on how to use their usually concealed-carry sidearms. Bars allow customers to linger till closing with no thought of the killer combination of alcohol and guns.

It’s commonly believed that more than half the homes in this nation have one or more guns inside. In the West, it’s likely much more than half.

Children arm themselves and kill each other so often it doesn’t always make the national news. Their classrooms are fat targets. Churches, too.

Last week’s attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s husband by a nutcase with a hammer was far more than just two adult men in a struggle for survival. It was a full-on testament to the undercurrent of violence in our society. In our “entertainment.” In our video games. In our streets. In our schools. In our churches. In our politics.

It was testament to our acceptance of that violence and of the obvious failure of us as a society to address and conquer it.

The plain fact is, if we don’t recognize we are a broken society in need of repair, we could lose our democracy - our republic - and succumb to the uncontrolled violence that would result.

When I was a kid, I had a paper route in a small Oregon town. A route that extended into the forest on the edge of that town. I walked that route daily and got home after dark. Now, all these years later, I would not retrace those many steps. I would not have the sense of youthful, taken-for-granted, small town “security” in doing it.

In a week, we’ll ending the angriest, most contentious and unnecessarily in-your-face political campaign I have ever witnessed. Vile threats. Angry repudiation. Taunts and personal confrontations. Debates - many debates - some where qualified candidates would not participate because of perceived dangers posed by people whose names never should have been on a printed ballot.

Some months ago, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy decided to “anoint ” himself “Speaker of the House In-Waiting.” At a public event, he mused accepting the Speaker’s gavel from Pelosi “without hitting her with it.” Rude. Crude. Contemptuous. Dangerous words.

The seemingly endless “fuel” for our society of hate and anger is everywhere. Leaders - people who obviously should know better - spout violent, verbal B.S. at will. Others who hear the dangerous words note there seems to be no backlash - no societal revulsion - so they repeat the slime and, pretty soon, we’ve adjusted - allowed ourselves to “accept” such language and the accompanying behavior.

Somehow - somewhere - someone or many “someone’s” have to lance this boil of vitriol and anger. We’ve got to end the threats - real and perceived - to the underpinnings of society.

It must STOP!. It MUST!

If we continue to accept our current national rage in nearly any venue, our freedoms will have to be defended in the streets. By us. With weapons.

Paul Pelosi faced a someone with a hammer. That attack, by someone with mental problems, is more than just the violation of one family’s zone of personal safety. More than a rupture of the comfort of someone’s home.

It was a warning that no place is safe. No place is “off limits” to someone filled with anger. There is no sanctity of safety even in the bosom of our family.

This time it was a townhouse in San Francisco. Where will it be next? Where?

 

Whither thou?

rainey

“The radical left believes freedom OF religion is actually freedom FROM religion. The good news is, after four years of the Trump-Pence administration, I’m confident we have a pro-religious freedom majority on the Supreme Court. Help is on the way.”
MIKE PENCEMay come as a surprise to you - as it was to me - that more than half the Trumpian criminals who attacked the Capitol in January came from Democrat strongholds. ‘Tis true.

Political scientist Robert Pape, a guy who researches such things, found more than half came from states and counties Trump won.

Example: some arrested Trump folk came from New York State in six major city zip codes. That’s how Pape tracks ‘em. Same for Biden-won states. Guess if you live in a city that votes Democratic, your neighbor might be planning for a civil war.

Pape’s work also found arrest after arrest took place, not in your typical red state, but in deep blue Democrat states and cities. The arrested were often middle class, older and new to extreme right movements. Average age 40; nearly half business owners or used to white collar work.

Pape’s research, of course, will be viewed with the works of other students of things scholarly political, as well as the parties themselves.

The central question to such political research is this: what is the future of the Republican Party? Will it continue as is - dominated by Trump? Or, will more qualified and serious Republicans drive him out into the wilderness? Or, will those same serious Republican folk form a new party with the help of some of the growing number of independents? Guess we’ll get some answers tonight as polling results roll in.

All grist for the mill. So, let’s add some of our own grist.

Consider: Senator Romney being roundly booed by Utah GOPers at a Republican leadership meeting. Sustained booing to which Romney replied “Aren’t you embarrassed?” Given a resulting uptick in hollering, guess not. And Romney deliberately did not endorse fellow Utah Senator Lee this year.

And Republicans - both in and out of the U.S. House of Representatives - attacked Rep. Liz Cheney because she had the guts to vote to impeach DJT and serve on the January 6th Committee. What about that? Lost her seat in Congress. Republicans eating their own? Wouldn’t be the first time.

The whole damned Party is in upheaval. Lots of factors - and a whole lot of just plain determined ignorance - making things hard to figure.

Like this: Recent CNN polling found 70% - 70% - of GOP folks contacted believe Biden did NOT win the 2020 election or think he won it underhandedly. Seventy-percent! How do you reason with such appalling ignorance? How do you have a viable, meaningful political party when seven-out-of-ten of your folks refuse the results of the most audited and re-audited national election in our lifetimes?

And this: “The Great Replacement.” This is just one of the myths of Trump followers who call themselves Republicans. The idea that people of another color are going to “replace” White Americans as a majority by 2050. Many in the GOP are scared of that eventuality. Scared and angry.

Consider the unhinged “Project 1619" law signed by Idaho’s governor. The loud, baseless rejection of substance tied to the New York Times project. But, given Trump, his followers, the entire conspiratorial hate voice B.S. and (un)social media, the “replacement” theory has taken root in Republican politics. Which adds still more fuel to the fire of hatred extant in that party today.

Trump and his minions have been pounding the theme that “cancel culture”is destroying jobs now held by White workers and that participants in Black Lives Matter protests will soon come to “burn down” houses of White Americans. This is what’s being preached currently at GOP rallies. Everywhere.

How do you reform a political party with all that B.S. flying around the room? Other scholarly research shows more Americans claiming to be “Republicans’ have more guns than Democrats and some are planning for the big “boogaloo” or civil war.

At Republican events, you often see more Trump banners than American flags. There’s mocking of anything Democrat, a steady stream of lies and bigotry from speakers and entertainers. And the audience? The audience claims to be Trumpian or Republican. Or both.

There were more Marjorie Taylor Greens, more Lauren Boeberts, more Matt Gaetzs, more Josh Hawleys on our ballots this year. Ignorant of responsibilities as members of Congress, ignorant of American history and the Constitution. Unfit to serve.

But, they represent today’s Republican Party. They’re the office holders. They’ve won the elections. They cast votes and spend our tax dollars. They often make life-or-death decisions on our behalf. They’re called upon to be “leaders.”

The question of “Whither thou, Republican Party” needs to be answered and soon. Who’s going to restructure it as a viable national political organization our country needs? Or, failing that, who’s going to build another political entity that can offer a safe place for disenchanted Republicans and independents who are seeking substance, honesty, truth and similar values?

The issue’s on the table today at polling places around the nation. What now?