On Tuesday, the two main candidates for governor – Republican Brad Little and Democrat Paulette Jordan – will meet for their first face-off, at the College of Idaho at Caldwell.
What should they talk about?
Here are a few topics they, and the panel of questioners, might consider.
The cost of housing: The sheer ability to get housing – in the parts of Idaho that are growing – has become something close to a crisis. This is a regional, not just a local, issue. What can and should the state do?
As the housing problem suggests, the parts of Idaho are growing, or slipping, in different ways. How can the growth in some parts of Idaho be harnessed to avoid the troubles of boomtowns, but help and boost the parts of Idaho that are stagnant or in decline?
Should the Medicaid expansion ballot issue pass? (Jordan has endorsed it, Little has declined to state a position.) If it does, what will you do to make it work in a frequently hostile political climate? If it doesn’t, what will you do to help solve the problems that have led to its placement on the ballot?
This year’s Idaho Republican convention called for punishing businesses that employ undocumented workers. What do you think the state should do about that?
Pause for a look at the big picture on taxes: Is Idaho’s tax structure taken as a whole fair? How can it be improved?
How do you plan to communicate with the public? Please explain how that relates to your, or your party’s, relationship with the news media in Idaho.
Tell me something – one specific thing, a law, a rule, a process, a program or whatever – that another state does that Idaho would be wise to emulate; and other specific thing from another state Idaho would do well to avoid.
A one-off for Jordan: You’ve accumulated a long and growing list of campaign missteps, from uncertainty about keeping your legislative seat, to involvement with outside issues, to campaign administration problems, to (this isn’t too strong a description) attacks on news reporting, and beyond. If all this doesn’t suggest a lack of preparation for the top elective administrative job in Idaho, what does it say?
A one-off for Little: How are you and your prospective governorship anything other than the Otter Administration Mark IV? Granting some successes (and a strong Idaho economy, attributable only in part to state government), plenty of Idahoans, including plenty of Republicans, would like to see something else after 12 years. Will there be anything substantial other than new names on the doors? And if so, what is that?
And: What do you think is the biggest piece of unfinished business the Otter Administration is leaving behind, and how would you deal with it? How as a practical political matter would you get it done – and why hasn’t it been done yet?
For that last question, at least, there are more than a few reasonable answers. Maybe allow an extra minute on that one.