Writings and observations


Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

Legislative battle over Labrador sage grouse provision (Boise Statesman)
Reviewing labor unions and right to work (IF Post Register)
Many Idaho median incomes drop (IF Post Register, Nampa Press Tribune)
Magic Valley cities intend to start aquifer recharge (TF Times News)
Most losing statewide Ds outraised Rs (TF Times News)
TF downtown group may demolish Rogerson building (TF Times News)

Gearheart mayor faces recall (Astorian)
Warrenton sees fast-growing elementary enrollment (Astorian)
Pocket park attached to civic stadium plan (Eugene Register Guard)
School district, YMCA bidding on land (Eugene Register Guard)
New commander at air force project in KF (KF Herald & News)
Engineers trying to repair canals near KF (KF Herald & News)
Bighorn sheep returning to the upper Klamath (Medford Tribune)
Medford looks to add 1,650 acres to its boundaries (Medford Tribune)
Proposed budget increases mental health services (Pendleton E Oregonian)
Wolf pack closely watched for attacks (Pendleton E Oregonian)
Portland cops want body cams (Portland Oregonian, Salem Statesman Journal)
Uber cars head into Portland despite rules (Portland Oregonian)

Kitsap signs deal for heritage park (Bremerton Sun)
Lots of concerns from veterans at meeting (Bremerton Sun)
Another bus line to Paine Field possible (Everett Herald)
Viaduct sags with Bertha troubles (Seattle Times)
Reviewing the WA troglodytes of the 80 (Spokane Spokesman)
Tacoma may extend airport runway (Tacoma News Tribune)
Clark County looks at more charter adjustments (Vancouver Columbian)
More difficulties for waterfront project (Vancouver Columbian)

Share on Facebook

First Take

peterson MARTIN

When President Obama and his daughters paid a recent visit to a Washington, DC book store, two of his purchases were books by Idaho authors – All the Light We Cannot See by Anthony Doer and The Laughing Monsters by Denis Johnson. This was no fluke. Writers with Idaho roots are gaining more and more national prominence.

Earlier this week Idaho author and University of Idaho faculty member Kim Barnes was honored at the annual Governor’s Awards for the Arts with an Excellence in the Arts Award. She has also been a Pulitzer Prize finalist. Her husband, the much honored poet Robert Wrigley, also a UI faculty member, is a past recipient of the Governor’s Award. They are the first couple to be honored individually with the Governor’s Award.

On the same day that Barnes received her Governor’s Award, the New York Times arts section had a front page review of Boundary County resident Denis Johnson’s latest novel, The Laughing Monsters. Johnson has also been a Pulitzer finalist – two times. His book Train Dreams takes place in Idaho’s panhandle and won the Aga Khan Prize from the Paris Review. Train Dreams was reviewed in the New York Times by another Idaho writer, Anthony Doer.

Doer, who lives in Boise, has received wide acclaim. His latest novel, All the Light We Cannot See, occupies the number 8 spot on the Times best seller list. It has been on the list for 28 weeks. Longer than any other book currently on the list. The book was a finalist this year for the National Book Award.

Another finalist this year for the National Book Award, was Marilynne Robinson for her novel Lila. Robinson was born and raised in Sandpoint. In 2005 she won the Pulitzer Prize for fiction for her book Gilead. She is currently on the faculty of the Iowa Writers Workshop, perhaps the most celebrated creative writing program in the country.

Mystery author Ridley Pearson is a part time resident of Hailey, Idaho. Pearson has written 48 novels. Many of them NY Times best sellers. His series of books featuring the fictional Sherriff Walt Fleming takes place in Sun Valley. A measure of the esteem in which he is held by other writers is his membership in the musical group Rock Bottom Remainders. Other members of the group include Amy Tan, Steven King, Dave Berry, Robert Fulghum, Barbara Kingsolver and Roy Blount Jr.

Idaho has been home to other prominent writers. Lawrence Gipson grew up in Caldwell and graduated from the University of Idaho in 1903.In 1904 he was a member of the third class of Rhodes Scholars. He became a noted historian and in 1962 won the Pulitzer Prize for History.
Mountain Home native Richard McKenna’s best known work was The Sand Pebbles. It won the 1963 Harper Prize and was made into a movie starring Steve McQueen. McQueen was nominated for the Academy Award for his performance.

Perhaps the most prolific Idaho born author was Vardis Fisher. His 1965 novel, Mountain Man, was made into the movie Jeremiah Johnson, starring Robert Redford. Much of his work was not well reviewed and was written in a style that makes it very difficult for the average reader to appreciate.

Other notable writers with Idaho ties are, of course, Ernest Hemingway and Ezra Pound. Hemingway died in Ketchum, twelve miles from Hailey, where Pound was born. Edgar Rice Burroughs, the creator of Tarzan, lived in both Pocatello and Parma. While living in Parma, he served a term on the city council.

But those earlier Idaho writers were few and far between. Today there is a growing group of Idaho writers gaining national prominence. With the highly respected creative writing program at the University of Idaho, and another getting established at Boise State University. we can expect to see these numbers grow in the coming years. It is something in which all of us should take pride.

Marty Peterson is a native of the Lewiston Clarkston Valley. He is retired and lives in Boise.

Share on Facebook



Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

Snow park underway at Eagle (Boise Statesman)
Legislators named to leadership, committees (IF Post Register, Nampa Press Tribune)
Reviewing unions in Idaho (IF Post Register)
Glanbia looking at $82m expansion (TF Times News)

UO will be part of sexual violence suvey (Eugene Register Guard)
Local officials split on water agreement (KF Herald & News)
USO master gardeners no help on pot (Medford Tribune)
Possible downtown Medford renewal district (Medford Tribune)
Oregon Caves expansion moving ahead (Medford Tribune)
Hermiston trade, meeting center ground broken (Pendleton E Oregonian)
State may spent $600k for pot administration (Pendleton E Oregonian)
OSU football coach heads to Nebraska (Portland Oregonian, Salem Statesman Journal)

Boeing tanker nearly ready to fly (Everett Herald)
Clark County rural pot store ban wins in court (Longview News)
More gun check ideas planned (Olympian, Vancouver Columbian)
Port Angeles downtown group director laid off (Port Angeles News)
Sequim wins in court on labor dispute (Port Angeles News)
Starbucks trying new style store at Capitol Hill (Seattle Times)
Diverse Bellevue has leaders that are less so (Seattle Times)
Fire district levy fails in east Pierce (Tacoma News Tribune)
Hotel development locked in for waterfront (Vancouver Columbian)
Clark auditor draws complaints from fellow Rs (Vancouver Columbian)
Pacific NW University unveils campus plan (Yakima Herald Republic)

Share on Facebook

First Take

frazier DAVID


When a second grade student at a Middleton elementary school noticed “a gun” in the backpack of a fellow 7 or 8-year-old second grader, he did the right thing and told his teacher.

The teacher did the right thing and notified school officials. From that point it got weird according to a report in the DAILY PAPER. For better or worse–remember, we are talking 7-year-old kid with a toy gun zipped away in his backpack–school officials called the Canyon County sheriff.

In a normal society untainted by school shootings, cops killing 12-year-old kids on video, big kids scaring cops so bad they blow away the kid resulting in riots, a copper would be sent to visit the classroom.

We are no longer a normal society. Canyon’s Sheriff responded with 18 coppers, several nearby schools were “locked down,” and the poor little 7-year-old was immediately suspended from school. We don’t know the words used by the teacher, the administration, or the dispatcher, but such an over reaction is bound to make future witnesses “gun shy” about reporting potential misbehavior.

A seasoned teacher would have simply picked up the child’s backpack and in a worse case scenario, called the boy’s mother. The sheriff says the kid did not display the toy gun (with red cap on the barrel), didn’t threaten, didn’t point it at anyone.

There is the usual “continuing investigation,” but we suspect somewhere after the well intended notification by the second grade student and confiscation of the toy, the report escalated to, “Gun in a classroom> call police> unknown weapon at school> send back up> lock down schools just in case> suspended for no tolerance.”

Everyone needs to calm down and COMMUNICATE. Everyday folks on cell phones race to call 911 to report car crashes. Police get so many calls with reports in the “east lane, west lane, just before and just after milepost 54,” that the dispatcher sends fire trucks, ambulance, and police fearing multiple crashes and injuries.

Today’s computer dispatching and truncated lingo can have tragic results when responding officers are sent to “man with a gun” calls instead of “caller thinks there is a boy with a fake gun.” A 12-year-old kid was killed by Cleveland coppers who made a hasty response, driving within 8 feet of the youth across the grass in a small park.

Share on Facebook



Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

Warrentless blow draws banned by supreme court (Boise Statesman)
Deputy moved up to state prison director (Boise Statesman, Nampa Press Tribune)
Major downtown Caldwell buildings redeveloped (Nampa Press Tribune)
Amy’s Kitchen co-owners talk about Pocatello (Pocatello Journal)
Idaho Rail Shop deals with fire damage (Pocatello Journal)
Legislative leaders mostly stay in place (TF Times News)
Business coalition urges Boulder as monument (TF Times News)
Glanbia will grow its operation at TF (TF Times News)

OSU master gardeners won’t help on pot grows (Eugene Register Guard)
UO strike by graduate assistants continues (Eugene Register Guard)
Klamath College dealing with budget gap (KF Herald & News)
Water agreement draws backing from cattkemen (KF Herald & News)
Schools at Medford see administrator raises (Medford Tribune)
Jackson Co wants control of federal lands (Medford Tribune)
Salmon license plate debate continues (Medford Tribune, Pendleton E Oreognian)
Study: Wolf kills may increase livestock attacks (Pendleton E Oregonian)
Pendleton buys new street sweeper (Pendleton E Oregonian)
$583,000 sought for state pot administration (Portland Oregonian)
Progress on Oregon caves expansion bill (Salem Statesman Journal)
Child care costs in state growing (Salem Statesman Journal)

Bainbridge councilman may quit over records case (Bremerton Sun)
Growth in Kitsap aimed around cities (Bremerton Sun)
Former bikini espresso hits demolished at Everett (Everett Herald)
State planning tolling lanes on 405 (Everett Herald)
Area crabbers faring better this season (Longview News)
Hanford may become national historical park (Longview News)
Scientists researching the Northwest fault (Port Angeles News, Longview News)
Olympic Medical exec gets pay raise (Port Angeles News)
Maybe progress for Alpine Lakes wilds bill (Seattle Times)
WSU: Wold kills may increase livestock kills (Spokane Spokesman)
Tacoma will close unlicensed pot shops (Tacoma News Tribune)
Franciscan Health names new CEO (Tacoma News Tribune)
Study reviews cost of water plan at Yakima (Yakima Herald Republic)

Share on Facebook

First Take

harris ROBERT


The Strategic Decision:

In early 2014, as a group of election reformers were strategizing on their best chances to change our voting system they made a critical decision.

Mark Frohnmayer, one of the chief architects of the four different draft initiatives, favored initiative 54 which included an open primary with approval voting and a top two final election.

newsApproval voting is a scientifically tested model of voting that according to voting experts will produce a more satisfying result for the most voters and is not as subject to manipulation as other types of voting. (For more on voting theory go to The Center for Election Science).

Jim Kelly, an active and generous supporter of election reform, favored initiative 55. I-55 included the open primary with a top two general election, but not approval voting. It continued our current system known as first past the post voting. All electors would vote for a single candidate in an open primary and only the top two would move onto the final general election.

Kelly and his supporters believed that including approval voting and an open primary would be too big of a leap for voters. Kelly’s argument won the day and all the money coalesced behind Initiative 55 which won a place on the Oregon General election ballot as Measure 90. (Note: Frohmnayer believed that M90 included an implicit charge to the Legislature to implement a form of approval voting or IRV as well. Others contest that mandate)

When A Door Shuts a Window Opens:

Measure 90 was crushed. It wasn’t enough of a change to inspire many independents, it ignored the legitimate concerns of minor parties who felt marginalized, and it went too far for major parties and their base who believed an open primary threatened their influence.

But while M90 failed it did stir up a lot of debate and ideas by opponents, many of whom did agree that there were ways to improve our democracy through election and voting reform. While it may have been a cynical position, the meme from many major party activists during the election was that they weren’t against election reform and getting more people involved in voting per se, but that M90 was not the answer. The most common theme was that an open primary wasn’t real reform. Real reform would be some form of instant runoff voting (IRV), or ranked choice voting, or some other similar voting method. One that would empower more voters while respecting the rights of major and minor parties.

These major party activists who were fighting against M90 were making some of Frohnmayer’s argument. It isn’t necessarily the top two feature that is the critical reform, it’s the voting mechanism that is critical to making reform work and empowering voters.

So, in continuing that conversation with open minded Democrats and Republicans I’d like you to consider this.

Approval voting as applied to news sources.

Pew Research recently released a study which asked news consumers to rank their favorite news source and the trustworthiness of most of the better known news sources. The results were sorted by political leaning.

Using this data we can demonstrate the differences between first past the post and approval voting, and how approval voting with an open primary leads to more satisfying choices for more people, and allows for incremental changes and a political consensus without the need to compromise on principle when voting.

Pew’s Methodology:

Pew first identified five political cohorts of news consumers.

Consistent Liberals
Mostly Liberal
Mostly Conservative
Consistently Conservative

These consumers were asked two specific questions producing data sets for each question broken down into the political cohorts.

What is your main source of government and political news
Do you Trust or Distrust a source of news

The Set up:

Lets assume that we were to take a national vote on the following question.

If there was a national emergency and all communications were compromised in the US, and we could use limited public resources to re-establish communication for a single news source, which news source would it be?

The Pew data lets us simulate this vote using both a closed primary and first past the post voting method and the approval voting method with or without a closed primary.

I. Closed Primary, First Past the Post

First, we sort the data into “parties”

The consistent liberals and mostly liberal will stand for Democrats
The Mixed will be the independents and non affiliated
The mostly conservative and consistently conservative represent Republicans

Next using the data set “What is your main source of news broken down by political type” which is identical to a first past the post voting method, we determine the Democratic and Republican closed primary winners. The independent cohort is ignored. Here are the “primary results” for Democrats and Republicans

Democratic Primary:

CNN: 35%
NPR: 22%
MSNBC: 17%
Local TV: 16%
New York Times: 10%

And the Republican Primary Results:

Fox News: 77%
Local Radio: 17%
Local TV: 11%
CNN: 9%
Yahoo News: 6%

A general election would feature CNN and Fox as well as any minor party and independent candidates.

II. Open primary using first past the post voting. Top two final election

Using this same data set – what is your main source of news – and including the independent voter results creating an open primary election would result in this:

CNN: 16%
Fox: 15%
Local TV 10%
NPR: 5%
Local Radio 4%

So, whether you have an open or closed primary, if you were to use first past the post voting the results are the same. The final top two are CNN and Fox News. The downside with the open primary with a top two and first past the post voting is that no smaller market niche news sources (MSNBC, Wall Street Journal) would appear on the General election ballot. That seems to be the worst result of all options. In a closed primary using first past the post voting, even though the smaller news outlets may stand no chance of winning in a final election (see full Pew results) their voices can be important in the final election as their points of view may be adopted by the major contenders in order to reduce the chance that the minor choices could act as spoilers. And this was the exact argument that I believe won the day for M90 opponents

III. Approval Voting – Closed Primary- Top two

The second set of data, whether a news consumer trusts or distrusts a news source, is an approval style of voting. If you trust a news source I would argue that it’s the same as saying you approve it. If you distrust it, you would pretty clearly not give it an approval vote.

Here are the top 5 most trusted news sources by party in a closed primary

Democratic Primary

CNN: 61%
PBS: 60.5%
NBC News: 59.5%
ABC New: s 55.5%
NPR: 54%

Republican Primary

Fox News: 80%
Sean Hannity Show: 45%
Rush Limbaugh Show: 42.5%
Glenn Beck Program: 37.5%
Wall Street Journa: l 31%

(Important note: CNN is the Republican’s 6th most trusted news source)

You get identical results using approval voting in a closed primary. You would again have Fox and CNN facing off against each other in a general election. And since it’s a closed primary you would again have minor party and independent candidates on the general election ballot in a closed primary system.

IV. Approval Voting – Open Primary (With or without top two or runoff)

Adding the approval/trust ratings of the independents, Democratic and Republicans into an open primary with approval voting and you get:

CNN: 54%
ABC News: 50%
NBC News: 50%
CBS News: 46%
Fox New: s 44%

Now there’s something drastically different. Fox isn’t even in the top four most trusted. Because so many independents and Democrats simply don’t trust Fox.

Since the Pew data doesn’t do a head to head comparison of CNN and ABC/NBC (tied for the second spot but lets say ABC news was in second. For the sake of argument), it’s not possible to say who would win in a top two runoff between CNN and ABC . If there were no top two runoff, then CNN is selected. If there is, then ABC and CNN face off against each other in a final election or runoff.


Simply changing to an open primary while maintaining first past the post voting may not change any dynamics or options in a general election for major parties. But it would exclude Minor party candidates in November. A bad result and a good reason to have opposed M90.

Simply changing first past the post to approval voting in a closed primary may not change the dynamics of our elections, at least as long as the major parties maintain such a high degree of partisanship. Though it would allow minor party and independent candidates to participate in November. A better result IMO than open primary with first past the post.

An open primary with approval voting and a top two final election provides better choices for independents and even arguable for mostly liberal and mostly conservative voters. Because having ABC or NBC news in the general election provides the mostly conservatives with a better chance of seeing their second most trusted news source rather than their 6th most trusted news source (Remember only 16% of Republicans trust CNN – the presumptive winner in a head to head against Fox – as a news source)

With an open primary, approval voting, and top two general election, ABC or NBC news would have an opportunity to convince more news consumers to change their vote in the general election, perhaps by hiring Wolf Blitzer, or adding programming like All Things considered or Radio Lab to their lineup which could attract some independent liberals)

Check out the top five in the closed and open primary. Both with and without approval voting. Under first post the post and closed primary with or witout approval voting, you see what some would consider very liberal and very conservative top finishers. However In the open primary with approval voting you see more consistent mainstream media in the top 5. While some may claim this is a bad outcome, and reduces clear choices, that’s only true if you don’t believe in incremental change and government by consensus. But, it is a valid critique.

You could reach the same result as the open primary + approval voting without a primary. Which would allow minor parties to participate in the most important election. The benefit of having preliminary vote is that it allows a short time for the top two to form coalitions to attract voters prior to the general election. Consider a September preliminary open primary with approval voting and a November top two. Or no primary, a general election with approval voting, and a runoff in December if no one achieves 50% plus one.

Share on Facebook



Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

Funds for new skate park donated in Boise (Boise Statesman)
Schools find ways to bring tech into classes (Boise Statesman)
Canyon cops already using body cameras (Nampa Press Tribune)
Caldwell may see affordable housing efforts (Nampa Press Tribune)
Chubbuck considers 44% pay hike for mayor (Pocatello Journal)
Schools in Magic Valley eyeing bonds (TF Times News)

Picketers active in UO labor strike (Eugene Register Guard)
GMO measure recount gets underway (Salem Statesman Journal, Medford Tribune, KF Herald & News)
Klamath commissioners look again at jail levy (KF Herald & News)
KF city council support water deal (KF Herald & News)
Most streams covered under new dredge ban (Medford Tribune)
Kitzhaber proposes $51.6 million for water fund (Pendleton E Oregonian)
Salmon license plate funds goes to pay salary (Portland Oregonian)
Video lottery funds most benefit a few (Portland Oregonian)
More executive shifts for Cover Oregon (Salem Statesman Journal)

Bremerton considers its $37.5m budget (Bremerton Sun)
Oso commission work continues (Everett Herald)
Bothell struggling with North Creek Forest funds (Everett Herald)
First Federal bank now offering stock (Port Angeles News)
Big Duwamish River cleanup planned (Seattle Times)
Amazon faces conflict in gender policy, giving (Seattle Times)
State proposes new rules for oil trains (Vancouver Columbian)
Senator Rivers runs for Vancouver council (Vancouver Columbian)
Legal pot prices still well above black market (Yakima Herald Republic)
Man seeks new trial on pot charges (Yakima Herald Republic)

Share on Facebook

First Take

malloy CHUCK

In Idaho

I love playing golf, but I hate hitting irons.
One day, I heard somebody talk about the key to better iron play. “Get rid of the darn things,” he said. I did, and my golf game improved dramatically with my odd assortment of fairway woods.

The same principal can apply to elections in Idaho. Get rid of the darn things – at least as they are now. General elections at the top of the ticket have all the suspense of old communist Russian ballots, where only one name counts – the one with the “R” label. Democrats have become irrelevant. But as bad as general elections are, primary elections are worse. The voting turnout in late May is disgustingly low – especially with the closed primaries. But the open primaries also were a disaster in terms of low turnout.

Secretary of State-elect Lawerence Denney has said he favors eliminating primary elections and letting the parties figure out how to nominate their candidates. Actually, he’s on the right track because it’s ridiculous for the state to be spending money on primary elections that draw less than 20 percent of eligible voters. Since some 80 percent of the people have made it clear they don’t want to exercise their right to vote, then maybe they should lose that right. If nothing else, the howls of protest would offer some entertainment value.

A better idea is to find something else that does work. Oregon voters rejected an interesting idea that is used in Washington and some other states: End closed primaries and open the elections to all comers. The top two vote-getters for a given office would square off in the general election.

That means, two Republicans could be running against one another in a general election – which often would be the case in Idaho. If the top-two format were used in Idaho in the governor’s race, Gov. Butch Otter might have been going against Republican State Sen. Russ Fulcher instead of Democrat A.J. Balukoff. Voters in rural Idaho – which holds all the power in elections – then would have a real choice.

Idaho is not a two-party system in a traditional sense, but there are two distinctly divided factions in the Republican Party. There is, in lack of a better name, the “Tea Party Crowd” (TPC), led by Congressman Raul Labrador and at least half of the state’s House leadership. That group has a name for the other side: RINO – “Republicans in Name Only,” with Otter and Congressman Mike Simpson being among the charter members. The TPC prides itself on being “traditional Republicans,” who oppose anything to do with President Obama, Medicaid expansion and government-sanctioned education standards. The RINO group doesn’t like Obama, but are friendlier to selective “moderate” causes.

Sen.-elect Grant Burgoyne, D-Boise, has a bill prepared that’s similar to the one rejected in Oregon and I hope he introduces it. Burgoyne has a few other ideas – including merging the primary and general elections and eliminating party labels.

“Political parties have outlived their usefulness,” he said. “Republicans and Democrats are a net negative in my view at the national level, and that’s becoming more true on the state level.”

Coming up with a perfect system probably is not possible, but as Burgoyne says, “everything we’re talking about is better than what we’ve got, which tells you something about what we’ve got.”

And what we’ve got is only a little bit better than Communist Russia – where, I think, my old golf irons are resting in misery.

Share on Facebook



Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

High Pacific temps may be hurting salmon (Boise Statesman)
Nampa reviewing its streetscape options (Nampa Press Tribune)
Caldwell looking at urban renreal possibilities (Nampa Press Tribune)
Old Town Pocatello draws, opens 7 businesses (Pocatello Journal)
Kraft plant blaze cause still unknown (Pocatello Journal)

1,500 graduate instructors strike at UO (Eugene Register Guard)
Kitzhaber budget would increase school funds (Portland Oregonian, Eugene Register Guard, Salem Statesman Journal, Medford Tribune, KF Herald & News, Pendleton E Oregonian)
3-month water outlook close to normal (KF Herald & News)
Wine in southern Oregon had a good 2013 (Medford Tribune)
Former BMCC executive charges race bias (Pendleton E Oregonian)
New Portland protesters mirroring Occupy (Portland Oregonian)

Bremerton Port leader apologies over meetings (Bremerton Sun)
Boeing providing changed health plans (Everett Herald)
Sauk-Suiattle Tribe may move over flooding (Everett Herald)
Pot shops banned in Woodland (Longview News)
Schoesler elected as Senate majority leader (Olympian)
LaPush considered highly popular coastal area (Port Angeles News)
Possible Gonzaga partnership with UW medical (Spokane Spokesman)
Benton loses majority deputy leader post (Vancouver Columbian)
Vancouver offered breaks to large employers (Vancouver Columbian)
State fruit industry looks ahead (Yakima Herald Republic)
Environment group wants into dairy-EPA suit (Yakima Herald Republic)

Share on Facebook

First Take

carlson CHRIS


Some state senator or some state representative somewhere in Idaho should ask Legislative Services to draft a bill for consideration by leadership that makes so much common sense it will probably be rejected—or consigned to oblivion in some committee chairman’s desk drawer.

The bill, if enacted, would prohibit a governor and a lieutenant governor from flying anywhere together on the same aircraft.

In Idaho, far more frequently than one may realize, Lt. Gov. Brad Little hooks a ride with Governor C.L. “Butch” Otter, especially during the campaign season when both are appearing at the same venue. That they may split the expense if the campaign is reimbursing the state for the flight to save both campaigns a few dollars is beside the point.

Even during the “non-campaign” season, though, Brad would hook a ride with Butch if both, as they often did, were participating in Governor Otter’s frequent Capitol For A Day visits across Idaho. Given Idaho’s sad history of plane crashes changing political history, one would think they would not fly together. But they do They like each other and enjoy each other’s company and there’s no law against it. But there should be.

While Idaho has yet to lose a sitting governor to an airplane crash, despite its mountainous terrain and its variable and changeable weather, all one has to do is to look at the neighboring states of Oregon and Montana for examples of sitting governors dying in a plane crash.

On October 28th, 1947, Oregon Governor Earl Snell, along with Oregon’s Secretary of State and its State Senate president, and their pilot all died in a plane crash east of Klamath Falls—-sad proof that it can happen and it can wipe out part of a state’s political leadership if they are flying together.

On January 25th, 1962, Montana Governor Don Nutter also died in a plane crash.

For Brad to fly with Butch is unnecessary risk-taking and it ought to stop. The bottom line is that we as taxpayers have an investment in the lieutenant governor, whomever he or she is. They are truly governors in waiting, and part of the purpose of the office is to ensure a smooth transition to capable hands should, Gof forbid, something happen to the sitting governor.
The writers of Idaho’s State Constitution as far back as 1888 and 1889 saw the wisdom in giving the lieutenant governor all the powers of the governor when the governor is out of state. For one thing, if they were of different parties, it would serve as a way to keep the governor close to home doing the job.

There is even a strict notification protocol that has to be followed of notifying the line of succession every time the governor and/or lieutenant governor leave the state. For example, even if they leave Idaho’s airspace for just 15 minutes, as happens when they fly from Boise to the Pullman-Moscow airport located just over the state line before driving back into Idaho, the line of succession has to be officially notified.

In Idaho, if both governors were to perish in the same accident the line of succession provides the Speaker of the House (Today that would be Scott Bedke from Oakley) would next serve as governor and if something were to happen to him the President Pro Tempore of the Senate (Today that would be Senator Brent Hill from Rexburg) would be next.

Idaho is fortunate in that the line of succession is filled with veteran and experienced politicians who would be capapble of quickly stepping up to the job, but no one wants a governor who has to be trained while doing the job

Incidentally, and not insignificantly, whoever is acting governor sees their daily pay rate rise up to that of the governor. After all, the individual is the governor, if not for a day, at least a part of the day.

Some states already prohibit a governor and a lieutenant governor from traveling together anywhere at anytime in anything regardless if plane, train or car. These are states that recognize there is an investment made in having and training a lieutenant governor to be ready to step into the role full-time if Fate so decrees.

Here’s hoping such a bill finds a sponsor, is printed and at least gets a hearing. Here’s hoping that both Butch and Brad recognize the common sense of the legislation and endorse it.

Share on Facebook