Writings and observations

malloy CHUCK
MALLOY

 
In Idaho

Democratic gubernatorial candidate A.J. Balukoff acknowledges that he hangs out mostly with his fellow Democrats. If he spent time in rural communities, and coffee shops not named Starbucks, he would know better than to take on the National Rifle Association – the sacred cow of special interests in Idaho.

Balukoff may well be correct about the NRA’s candidate survey being full of loaded questions, but he shouldn’t be surprised about that. The NRA is a defender of gun rights and many Idahoans love the organization because of that.

For a lot of Idahoans, the three most important issues in an election are: Guns, guns and guns. Rep. Raul Labrador’s town hall meetings often take on the flavor of an NRA convention. Of course, Balukoff would be the last person you’d see at a Labrador town hall meeting.
The NRA endorsement is the prized pig of any election season in Idaho. Even those who don’t get the NRA endorsement will talk about their avid support of the Second Amendment. But almost nobody takes on the NRA – except for Cecil Andrus, and Balukoff rightfully acknowledges is no Cecil Andrus.

According to a story by the Statesman’s Dan Popkey, Balukoff was advised by his campaign manager to stay silent on the NRA. So instead of following that advice, he issued a press release saying, “Special interests gave us Idaho’s guns on campus law.”

So under Popkey’s byline, Balukoff committed political suicide in the front page of the Idaho Statesman. How stupid can you get?

Balukoff ought to know the legislative chambers are full of people who think that universities, school classrooms, the streets and public places would be a lot safer if people who knew how and when to use guns were allowed to carry them. These lawmakers don’t need the NRA to tell them how to vote on gun issues.

If Balukoff was trying to do an impersonation of Andrus, who took on the gun lobby almost 30 years ago, it was a poor effort. Andrus is about the only person who could get away with calling NRA leaders “gun nuts.”

The shame of Balukoff’s effort is there is so much he can talk about. Idaho is last in wages and first in paying the minimum wage. The Gem State is at, or near, the bottom in almost all measures of education. The prison system is in dire need of reform. The governor and the Legislature refuse to expand the Medicaid system, which would save hundreds of millions of dollars over time. He could have plenty to say about the leadership, or lack of leadership, in the state. But by wasting political capital on the NRA, there isn’t a Republican between Bonner’s Ferry and Preston who’s going to want to work with Balukoff?

If Balukoff keeps this up, his next news release should be in the form of a concession statement.

Share on Facebook

Malloy

carlson CHRIS
CARLSON

 
Carlson
Chronicles

Never having met or even talked with Idaho’s current attorney general, Lawrence Wasden, I have no compunction about offering some free political advice.

First, in reviewing opinions he has provided to the governor and through his deputies, to the various state agencies, he comes across as thoughtful, reasonable, prudent, and logical with a good dose of common sense. He is not overtly partisan, either. He reads the law with due deference to precedent, and gives solid advice.

Secondly, he displayed genuine political courage in reframing the upcoming primary campaign as a fight for the soul and the future of the Republican Party, with reasonable, sensible, moderate Republicans on one side and unreasonable, uncompromising, blindly ideological “wing nuts” (my choice of words, not his) on the other side.

He is absolutely correct.

Imagine my surprise then when I saw an op-ed in the
April 9th edition of the St.Maries Gazette-Record, written by an intelligent but nonetheless rock-solid right-winger in Benewah County, Ken deVries. He does his homework and he at least listens politely to those he disagrees with.

Ken charged the attorney general had aligned himself with the “take your guns away” crowd, led by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, when he signed off on Idaho filing an amicus brief in the case that led to the historic Heller vs. the District of Columbia ruling in a 5-4 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court.

That ruling, with Justice Antonin Scalia writing for the majority, was the first time the Court ever interpreted the Second Amendment to be a qualified right for an individual to keep and bear arms to protect himself and his property apart from the Constitutional language that appeared to tie that right only to keeping and maintaining a well armed militia.

For some yet to be adequately explained reason, the office of the Idaho Attorney General filed an amicus brief in the preceding case and joined with the likes of the attorney generals of states like New York and Massachusetts, and liberal “we-need-more gun control” mayors like Mayor Bloomberg.

In discussing the issue with the Gazette-Record’s publisher, Wasden’s office claimed a mistake was made, that they quickly withdrew the amicus brief, turned around and filed a brief supporting the ultimate majority view as expressed by Justice Scalia. I accept that explanation, but Wasden has to recognize there are still unanswered questions.

Is the lawyer who drafted the initial amicus brief still on staff? If so, why wasn’t he fired? Anyone with an ounce of sense looking at the other signers should have known Idaho didn’t belong in that company. Some may make the argument that the AG’s office essentially thought the brief which they temporarily joined was all about a state’s right to develop its own rules and regulations.

That argument though then leads to why a Mayor Bloomberg would be supportive – it also then gives a state or a city the implicit right to restrict the Second Amendment right even more than the slight qualifications Justice Scalia would allow for.

So where does the attorney general really stand? How did this brief even get out the door given the subject matter?

It would be so easy to put together a “hit ad” that could run just before the May 20th primary: show a picture of Michael Bloomberg and read off a couple of his pro gun control statements. Then, show his name on the brief, move the camera up a couple of slots and show Wasden’s name. Have a narrator ask “What’s our attorney general’s name doing with this crowd of gun control advocates? Now is not the time to weaken gun ownership. There is an alternative: Vote for Chris Troupis, a true supporter of the Second Amendment.” Wasden would be toast if he fails to handle this properly.

This is one of those true game changers that could lead to a primary upset.

From years of providing political counsel to successful office holders, here’s the advice:

Get out front quickly and frame the issue. Submit to an interview with one of several fair and balanced Idaho political reporters. Admit to poor oversight but say you corrected the matter quickly and fire the deputy attorney who was so politically tone deaf as to have created such an egregious misrepresentation of your views.

Then send a letter to National Rifle Association vice president Wayne LaPierre asking that he recognize an honest mistake; and, suggest the NRA let the voters decide whether he should be turned out of office without being subjected to an NRA financed campaign. The, restate your unequivocal support for Scalia and Heller vs. D.C.

If you move quickly you can turn this to your advantage. Here’s hoping you do so.

Share on Facebook

Carlson

news

Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

Bud Purdy dies (Boise Statesman, TF Times News)
Copies of Meridian’s controversial book sent (Boise Statesman)
State sues Potlatch, Clearwater on fire (Lewiston Tribune)
Risch land exchange bill on hold (Lewiston Tribune)
Report: Lewiston port promoting growth (Lewiston Tribune)
Moscow meeting covers substance abuse (Moscow News)
Moscow water bond approved (Moscow News)
Chaney won’t quit House race (Nampa Press Tribune)
CWI reviewing Canyon fair relocation (Nampa Press Tribune)
Meridian interchange work begins (Nampa Press Tribune)
Explosive from WWII at Pocatello’s airport (Pocatello Journal)
Sho-Bans win control of FMC site (Pocatello Journal)
Grace/North Gem school merger hearings (Pocatello Journal)
Legislators review session (Sandpoint Bee)
Hot sheriff’s race in Minidoka County (TF Times News)

Pot outlet bans sought in 71 cities (Corvallis Gazette Times)
Lane sheriff seeks Florence cop job (Eugene Register Guard)
Lane Community College short on funds (Eugene Register Guard)
OIT nears energy self-sufficiency (KF Herald & News)
Klamath commission forum planned (KF Herald & News)
Funding sought for Klamath basin research (KF Herald & News)
Ashland prohibits plastic bags (Medford Tribune, Ashland Tidings)
Kentucky man may head Medford schools (Medford Tribune)
Cover Oregon repairs under review (Medford Tribune)
Teachers hired at more-flush districts (Portland Oregonian)
OR job growth rising again (Portland Oregonian, Salem Statesman Journal)

Still looking for Oso mudslide causes (Everett Herald)
Mini-dam on Skykomish River discussed (Everett Herald)
State pressure could risk Hanford projects (Kennewick Herald)
Kennewick won’t annex 21 acres (Kennewick Herald)
Goldmark takes timber money (Longview News)
Post-AG complaint, Dish refunds $2m to customers (Longview News)
Big concerns about Puget loss of 1k Boeign jobs (Seattle Times)
Seattle metro tax proposal (Seattle Times)
Spokane asks for parks levy (Spokane Spokesman)
Voters may consider full-time Spokane council (Spokane Spokesman)
Tacoma council considers new hotel (Tacoma News Tribune)
Voters back competing gun proposals (Vancouver Columbian, Yakima Herald Republic)
I-205 plan may help with driving (Vancouver Columbian)

Share on Facebook

First Take

harris ROBERT
HARRIS

 
Oregon
Outpost

Welcome Robert Harris, our latest contributor at Ridenbaugh Press. Harris has lived his entire life in the Oregon and Washington. He is the managing partner of Harris Law Firm, a general practice “Mom and Pop” law firm of ten attorneys located in the Portland Oregon metro region. For 30 years he was a registered Democrat but is now a leader in the Independent Party of Oregon and the editor of OregonOutpost.com.

The US Supreme Court’s line of cases protecting virtually unlimited election spending (and likely soon to make unlimited campaign contributions protected as free speech) has greatly empowered party and candidate financiers. A relatively small number of large corporations, unions, and wealthy donors are a distinct financial base within each major party. And a Party’s financial base is as important as the voting base. Because while money will automatically create a viable candidate (see Monica Wehby) and thus votes, a voting base won’t automatically create a large enough financial base to win an election.

So, it’s fair to now say that each major party has a distinct and powerful voting base and a financial base. And the edge the Democratic Party in Oregon has is that it’s financial base and voting base have greater issue overlap than the Republican financial and voting bases.

OR GOP base parties

The Oregon Democratic financial base is clearly unions and more specifically public employee unions. And the Democratic Party is very clear that it’s number one issue is the well being of employees. Preferably union employees, and more specifically public employees. Whether the issue is PERS, public spending on construction projects or schools, tax increases to pay for these services, government oversight or control of the land use process, the financial base and voting base of the Democratic Party are generally in sync on major issues and policies. Consequently, there is little tension within the Party and it can act very cohesively with less internal disruption or conflict between the two bases.

In comparison, the Republican financial base is more interested in a libertarian capitalism. Less government regulation and low taxes, while it’s voting base is more animated by social issues . Though low taxation and less government regulation are important as well for the voter base their blood boiling issues are immigration, gay marriage, abortion, and religious policies such as prayer in school and evolution. And, while disagreements between the Democratic financial base and voting base are more related to relative importance of a particular policy, the differences between the Republican financial and voter base are more often about the policy itself. Businesses want immigration reform. And think being anti gay is bad for business.

That’s not to say that the financial and voting base of the Democratic Party has perfect overlap and the Republican Party has no overlap. But if you were to compare a Venn diagram of the financial base agenda and the voter base agenda of each major party, and weight the differences for relative importance, I think the Democratic Party would have more overlap on more important issues. And the Republican Party would have more serious issue disagreements about more divisive issues.

The problem this presents for the Republican Party become apparent in contested primaries where one candidate is backed by the financial base and one is backed by the voting base. Two cases in point are the Conger v Wehby US Senate primary race and the Post v. Jensen House District 25 primary. These two races will test the willingness of the financial base to upset the voting base. Today Blogger Bruce McCain on Oregon Oracle reported that two members of the OR GOP financial base – Loren Parks and Andrew Miller – just formed an “independent” expenditure committee to go negative on Jason Conger. Should Wehby beat Conger, the question is how much damage will the financial base have done to Wehby’s support among the Republican voter base.

Compare those Republican Primary contests with the Democratic Primary in House District 42 where 5 Democrats are seeking their party nomination in a heavily Democratic district that will have no Republican opposition in November. I’d be shocked if that race got dirtier than a bit of “more liberal than though” finger wagging.

Whatever the reasons for the lack of issue overlap between the Republican financial and voting base is (and I have my personal explanation) it is an inherent weakness in the Oregon Republican Party. Until it’s addressed it makes the OR GOP appear weak, always on the verge of being at war with each other, and at times hypocritical.

That’s not a club many people want to join.

Share on Facebook

Harris

mansfield DENNIS
MANSFIELD
 

Many states are preparing to soon hold their Primary elections. Throughout the western states, the primaries are often held in the spring. For some states, like Arizona, their races for party nominations are held at the end of summer.

In Idaho, this party-centric nominating election is held in late May.

The two races that seem to capture the lion’s share of attention and news in Idaho are the GOP Primary races for Attorney General and Governor.

I’ve already covered the Attorney General race – stating that Christ (pronounced Chris) Troupis would make fine NEW attorney general. The incumbent’s tenure has simply been too long. (Having advocated term limits and fought a dying battle on behalf of them in Idaho, I STILL believe that elected officials MUST return home – either by force of law or force of vote.)

Regarding Governor, the case is the same.

Idaho’s sitting Governor, Butch Otter, and I have known each other for 23, almost 24 years. Many of those years have been friendly years – only distancing ourselves for a brief period of time when one another got in the way of the other’s mutually-desired GOP nomination to US Congress – a dozen-plus years ago. He won. I endorsed him the very next day and worked to see him get elected three times as Congressman and then twice as Governor. I have a deep affection and fondness for Butch and Lori Otter.

I also have a deep, decades-long friendship with Russ Fulcher and his family. I write about Russ in my book Beautiful Nate.

Originally, since neither candidate had asked for my endorsement, I withheld it. I just sat and watched – until this week.

Maybe it was today being Tax Day, maybe it was just my nature to think long and then act …

Today I decided to act and endorse State Senator Russ Fulcher for the GOP nomination for Governor of Idaho.

Here’s why:

Governor Butch Otter made two large blunders.

First, he embraced (and then led on) the state healthcare insurance exchange plan. He had a chance to be the Butch Otter many Idahoans have come to know and appreciate. Oddly, Butch Otter failed to BE Butch Otter on this major issue, failing to join many of his fellow GOP governors as they stood against it.

Second, he decided to run a third time as governor.

The first blunder has affected all Idahoans – the healthcare insurance exchange. The debate on that issue was well stated during the legislative session. Butch’s forces won. Idahoans lost.

Their insurance premiums, now due, reflect that loss – for many, but not all Idahoans.

My guess is that the number of affected conservative Republican individuals will be represented closely by the turn-out of primary voters who vote in favor of Senator Russ Fulcher.

Russ Fulcher has anchored his campaign to letting Idahoans know about this blunder. He’s been unrelenting. His campaign has been hard charging. In essence, Russ Fulcher is saying on the campaign trail what he said in the State Senate as he repeatedly stood and debated – there’s a better path than what Governor Otter decided to take.

Russ’ message is resonating with the needed amount of Idahoans.

It’s a relatively small pool of voters that will vote to determine if Butch Otter receives a third term. And many if those folks are clearly upset – Sen. Fulcher will receive their vote.

The other blunder was in deciding to run a third time. American politics is rooted in change. Elected officials need to run, win, serve and then leave. Butch has done all but one of those things on the voters’ bucket list.

Powerful interests are in a comfort zone with the possibility of his third term.

And have you noticed, there’s a sense of deja vu to their race?

The race between Mr. Otter and Mr. Fulcher has some interesting parallels to the 1st District U.S. Congressional race in 2010 which swept a relatively little-known local legislator into office and then into the national spotlight… now-Congressman Raul Labrador. I had an unusual perch from which to participate in that primary race, as the primary campaign spokesman for Labrador for Congress.

Let’s see how they rank together.

The GOP establishment weighed in heavily on the favorite and distanced itself from the challenger. 2010: check. 2014: check.

The challenger’s endorsement by the Tea Party was key to voter turnout. 2010: check. 2014: check.

The challenger, though unknown to many, seemed a likely next-best choice to the candidate they KNEW they didn’t want. 2010: check. 2014: check.

Social media’s role in an under-dog race avoids traditionally expensive primary campaign costs. 2010: check. 2014: check.

The challenger has an army of local moms and dads who have enlisted for short-term service. The incumbent has a paid staff. Big difference. 2010: check. 2014: check.

Identical situation? No. Close? Well, yes.

Butch Otter has been friendly and kind to many people, including my family and me – it’s his nature. Butch is no stranger to anyone.

But people aren’t voting for a friend. They’re voting for a governor. Voters want their leaders to stand tall against special interests and in favor of their pocket books and then get off the stage for the next act to take over.

Russ Fulcher is that next act and he will do that. It’s why I am endorsing him for Governor of Idaho.

Share on Facebook

Idaho Mansfield

news

Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

Eagle seizes part of greenbelt tract (Boise Statesman)
Women sue BSU on sex assault (Boise Statesman, Nampa Press Tribune)
Lewiston extends smoking ban (Lewiston Tribune)
Idaho public defender system blasted (Lewiston Tribune)
WSU will help at Oso mudslide (Moscow News)
Syringa park still said not in compliance (Moscow News)
Moscow city looking for marketing, rebranding (Moscow News)
Enrollment down at Treasure Valley CC (Nampa Press Tribune)
Canyon house prices and prices up (Nampa Press Tribune)
200 jobs at new Shelley jerky plant (Pocatello Journal)
Seizure of pot-laced candy at Montpelier (Pocatello Journal)
Litehouse buys Coldwater building (Sandpoint Bee)
Compromise Rangen water call ruling (TF Times News)
Battle between Lincoln clerk, planning head (TF Times News)
Businesses weigh in on TF downtown renewal (TF Times News)

More opening for Oregon jobs (Corvallis Gazette Times)
Benton Commission candidates at forum (Corvallis Gazette Times)
Eugene sets new business tax break (Eugene Register Guard)
KF explores air service options (KF Herald & News)
Klamath water project still short of water (KF Herald & News)
Gold Hill considers waste facility (Medford Tribune)
Oregonian nabs Pulitzer for PERS edits (Portland Oregonian)
Salem doc top OR earner for Medicaid (Salem Statesman Journal)
Chemeketa president in line for new job (Salem Statesman Journal)

Jail death care settled for $1.3m (Everett Herald)
GEO okays Boeing tanker effort (Everett Herald)
Kennewick faces coach abuse case (Kennewick Herald)
Maybe cleanup cuts at Hanford (Kennewick Herald)
Feds block some water for pot fields (Kennewick Herald)
Sequim city hall demolished (Port Angeles News)
Rodney Tom won’t run again (Seattle Times, Tacoma News Tribune, Vancouver Columbian, Yakima Herald Republic)
Goldmark reverses, accepts $100k timber money (Seattle Times)
Heavy drawndowns at Wanapum Dam (Spokane Spokesman)
Fire wipes out Puyallup fair hall (Tacoma News Tribune)
Herrera Beutler on fish preservation bill (Vancouver Columbian)
Ethics board reviews legislators free lunches (Vancouver Columbian)
Utilities/Transportation reviews party buses (Yakima Herald Republic)

Share on Facebook

First Take

rainey BARRETT
RAINEY

 
Second
Thoughts

The situation with the Bundy family out in the flatlands some 80 miles from Las Vegas is akin to a truck load of dynamite with a very, very short fuse – parked next to a wildfire. Even an accidental spark could get a lot of people killed. So the federal government has blinked – backing away from executing a very valid court order and made the pathologic freeloader a hero in the eyes of his government-hating friends.

At first glance, this is about a professional deadbeat who owes us taxpayers more than a million dollars in grazing fees – running his cattle on BLM lands for decades and ignoring the bills. Rather than back down, the BLM should have served the court order, confiscated his herd, sold ‘em at market and arrested the bastard for inciting sedition. Seems simple enough.

Like so many of their push-it-to-the-limit kind, Cliven Bundy and his family have taken the totally irresponsible position their ancestors were there before the BLM – their water rights predate federal ownership of the land – they’re not obligated to pay the bills the feds have been sending for more than two decades. And they haven’t! Not exactly living up to the promises made signing that federal grazing contract many years ago. Makes one wonder what changed their minds. And when.

Now, the Bundys claim they’ve tried to makes some payment on their water and grazing bills recently but nobody will take the money. And they’re right. The State of Nevada and the federal government will not accept payment. They can’t. That’s because the recent court order allowing the BLM to confiscate the cattle also freezes the whole Bundy situation. And their assets. The Bundys are in massive default.

But all that fades now because the Bundys have taken the position they’re the “aggrieved” party in this situation – that the feds are exceeding their authority – that the government is out to make an example of them – they’re victims of government excess – that they’re “patriots” who will hold out until the end. About 98.7% B.S.

The feds do appear to have some blame here. The BLM should’ve stepped in years ago with direct legal action to put an end to Bundy’s use of federal grazing lands for free. While I haven’t read the contract, I’d bet the farm there’s a section dealing with default – what it is – when it is deemed to have taken place – remedies for forcing contract compliance. And penalties. I’ve never signed a major contract without such language. And Bundy has been in default, according to the courts and government, for more than 20 years.

To let the Bundys run up a million dollar grazing tab for that long without collection action is, to my mind, completely irresponsible on the feds part. Get two months behind on your house payment and you can expect a guy from the bank at your front door. So – to some extent – this situation could have been nipped in the bud years ago.

But – as I said – because of the dangerous situation the Bundys have created by word and deed – trying to make themselves out the martyrs here – we’ve got an armed encampment of federal officers “cheek-by-jowl” with several hundred armed faux “freedom fighters” from half a dozen states who’ve come to the Bundy homestead to stand against anything governmental.

There’s a dangerous element in this country using the I-net and other media to whip itself into a frenzy of camouflage-wearing, government-hating, heavily-armed anger. Without knowing any firsthand details of Ruby Ridge or Waco, they blame the feds for those and any and all perceived attacks on their “personal freedoms” – most especially the Second Amendment to the Constitution – a document most of them have likely never read. They’re as unstable as a gallon of nitro on a bumpy road. Reasoning and logic are out of the question. They talk violence as if it were the only satisfactory response to their trumped up hatred. How many will actually stick around if shots are fired is anyone’s guess. But shooting is what they say they’ll do.

The back ridges and valleys of our Pacific Northwest also harbor a lot of very unstable people. Some hiding from something or someone. Some mentally over-the-edge from wars or simply lack of professional treatment. Others who call themselves “survivalists” and are convinced the world is soon to meet some cataclysmic end and believing they alone will be spared. Some are flat-out criminals growing marijuana or engaging in other illegal activities. And some have built heavily fortified compounds in which they’ve gathered family and vow to kill anyone who comes snooping about.

It’s this last bunch and their loony near-relatives who dress up in war clothing, paint their faces and spend weekends shooting and marching in the woods. These are the ones that pose the biggest threat. You’ll find a lot of ‘em converging on the Bundy ranch from this flock. Some of ‘em talk a good fight and that’s about it. But I also believe some will hunker down and try to “take out” as many feds with them as they can.

We’re a very violent society. Whether it’s a calamity of nature, some perceived grievance by one group or another or just the local university winning/losing a football game, violence and criminality lurk just beneath the surface. Smash – burn – loot – destroy. For all our civilized ways, we can be dangerous and violent with even the smallest provocation.

If that’s what you believe – and I do – then all these flag-waving, camo-wearing, jingoistic phony patriot, citizen “armies” should be taken very, very seriously. If you’ve got a strong stomach, read some of the Southern Poverty Law Center’s publications. You’ll find detailed and alarming descriptions of these groups identified in the research. You’ll find Oregon, Idaho, Washington, Utah and Montana harbor some of the most violent.

Looking back at Ruby Ridge and Waco – and the terrible loss of lives in both armed sieges – I’d guess the feds will sit tight and try to wait it out.

But it’s not the feds that worry me. It’s those armed loudmouths who believe their own media hype and see themselves as “protectors of those innocent government targets” – the Bundys. If just one of them – just one – has a misfire while cleaning an assault rifle, God knows what will happen in the next five seconds.

As a nation, we’ve deferred dealing with these dangerous people far too long. This is not a “Second Amendment” case. This is very, very close to armed insurrection. The Nevada desert may be where these people should face the reality that armed challenges of duly issued court orders and federal law have serious consequences. Deadly consequences if bullets start flying.

Take the cows – shut these guys down – make some arrests. With force if necessary. Any perceived backing away will just delay the inevitable.

Share on Facebook

Rainey

news

Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

WSU considers medical school (Boise Statesman)
Whitman Democrats name state delegates (Moscow News)
Exercise shows Rupert split in two by trains (TF Times News)

Effort to build craft beer museum (Eugene Register Guard)
Ashland may ban plastic bags (Ashland Tidings)
What to do with fees for wildlife parking (Medford Tribune)
Portland metro rules may limit composts (Portland Oregonian)
New stormwater fee about to hit Salem (Salem Statesman Journal)

Everett School District tries another bond (Everett Herald)
Kennewick annexation opposed (Kennewick Herald)
Teevin Brother to grow site at Rainier (Longview News)
Park chalet may have to be moved (Port Angeles News)
Spokane may open more area to pot grows (Spokane Spokesman)
Logging rises in east Clark County (Vancouver Columbian)
Possible medical school at WSU (Vancouver Columbian, Yakima Herald Republic)
Prosser tries 4th time on school bond (Yakima Herald Republic)

Share on Facebook

First Take

Oregon

 
IN THE OREGON WEEKLY BRIEFING The 173rd Fighter Wing will conduct night flying operations April 14-17, 2014, between approximately 9 p.m. and 11:30 p.m. Night flying is one part of the course curriculum for F-15 student pilots at Kingsley Field. “Night flying is a critical skill which our students need to learn to be effective war fighters,” said Col. Jeremy Baenen, 173rd Fighter Wing commander. “We understand the disruption to the community during night flying weeks, but we try our best to minimize the noise impact.” The community will most likely hear the jets during take-offs and approaches to and from Kingsley Field. Most of the training will occur in military operating airspace east of Lakeview.” (Photo/Oregon Military Department)

 
Share on Facebook

Briefings

news

Here’s what public affairs news made the front page of newspapers in the Northwest today, excluding local crime, features and sports stories. (Newspaper names contracted with location)

Profiling House candidate Bryan Smith (Boise Statesman)
Reviewing chinook numbers (Lewiston Tribune)
Profiling Andy Grover, Melba supt for st supt (Nampa Press Tribune)
Late income tax filers (Nampa Press Tribune)
Following up on Holbrook murders (Pocatello Journal)
PMC advancing in medical tech (Pocatello Journal)
Sandpoint arts charter school planned (Sandpoint Bee)
Filer under microscope after dog shooting (TF Times News)
Review candidates for state superintendent (TF Times News)

Difficulties with Glenwood convention project (Eugene Register Guard)
Reviewing Klamath health picture (KF Herald & News)
Army guard at Bend readies to deploy (KF Herald & News)
Overview of Medford library district plan (Medford Tribune)
Vancouver reconsiders oil train shipping (Portland Oregonian)
How to manage Cover Oregon? (Salem Statesman Journal)

Reviewing Oso mudslide (Everett Herald)
$7 million to repair Wanapum dam crack (Kennewick Herald)
Heroin ‘stronghold’ around Cowlitz (Longview News)
Gas prices increasing for season (Port Angeles News)
Clallam deputy prosecutor quits (Port Angeles News)
Fast growing in craft distilleries (Spokane Spokesman)
Debating over Spokane’s pit bull bites (Spokane Spokesman)
University Place town center moves ahead (Tacoma News Tribune)
Legialization may lead to pot research (Vancouver Columbian)
Oil terminal lease legality reviewed (Vancouver Columbian)
Yakima reconsiders prerelease jail effort (Yakima Herald Republic)
Yakima seeks more river water pumpage (Yakima Herald Republic)

Share on Facebook

First Take