Aug 24 2013
|RANDY STAPILUS / Oregon|
You can get the point behind the decision by the Eugene Police to quit running their radio transmissions over open air, available to all – including, of course, available to the transgressors they’re trying to catch.
Presumably, though, you would think there are ways around the real issues without going totally silent.
There are legitimate concerns. Cops would understandably not want to broadcast (literally) their moves when they’re trying to accomplish something by stealth. Private information, including such data as Social Security numbers, sometimes go out over those signals, as well as the names of people who may be guilty of nothing but become involved in something the police are doing.
And the Eugene Police apparently are providing a mechanism for news organizations to continue to track their signals.
Still. Putting aside the hobbyists, the people who simply enjoy being plugged in to whatever the police do, there are other reasons for allowing open air here. Foremost among them is allowing the public to keep tabs on their employees, employees who are given license to use force and violence on occasion. (That’s one reason among others why the growth in police video has some real merit.) What are these enforcers doing out there? Tune in and you can find out.
It may make a difference too for the officers themselves. People tend to act a little differently when they know they’re, as it were, on stage.
This circle should be squarable. There ought to be ways to allow much of the transmission to go public – surely most of it can be heard any anyone with no harm done – and then encrypt whenever there’s good reason to do that.
Technology should allow this to be not entirely an either-or situation.Share on Facebook