It’s over when it’s over

One of the best lobbyists Idaho has ever seen was asked some years back for the secrets of his success, and one of them was this: Don’t give up on a bill, don’t consider it dead, until the session is done. And then, it’s only dead for the session. An advisory worth remembering …

Last night, Idaho House Republicans held a caucus to consider what to do about the ticking bomb tossed into their laps from the Senate – Senate Bill 1387, the abortion ultrasound bill that has abruptly become a national news topic. A hearing in the House State Affairs Committee was scheduled for the next morning. Out of the caucus meeting came this decision: The hearing was cancelled, off the agenda. Under usual circumstances, that might mean the bill had reached its end, since legislators are talking about adjourning the session next week.

This morning, as word of that spread, the bill’s many critics, who have developed a political firestorm in Idaho and beyond over the last week, seemed to explode with joy: We won!

A word of caution: It’s not dead till the session is adjourned, and then only until the next session.

Dennis Mansfield, who has some years in the trenches on abortion-related legislation at the Idaho Legislature, writes this today at his blog: “I may be in error, but the legislative response of halting the proposed House hearing on the bill, now being reported by the national press, may well be a tactical time-out rather than a strategic stop. The national press will go home. And the Idaho House of Representatives will also prepare to go home. But my call is that prior to the close of the session the House will quickly take up the matter, pass it and let the Dem’s in the House and Senate bear the weight of this bill at the polls.”

He may be right. A bill can be passed in minutes, even on the day of final adjournment, if the votes are there to pass it, and the desire among Republican members of the Idaho House is probably quite strong.

Assume nothing.

Share on Facebook

2 Comments

  1. slfisher said:

    Can they pass it without a public hearing?

    March 22, 2012
  2. Of course they can. There’s no requirement for a hearing. Toward session ends, bills often shoot through without one (though they’re rarely as controversial as this). And no requirement of any particular rules for conducting one: A chair could allow, say, two speakers in favor, two against, and then the committee debates and votes.

    Doesn’t mean they will necessarily do it that way. But if they decide to, and have the votes, they can.

    March 22, 2012

Comments are closed.