Writings and observations

The case of Oregon v. Barry Lowell Barger, decided today by the Oregon Supreme Court, is worth some review by anyone who … well, visiting this space or any other in the World Wide Web. Be aware that the simple process of following a link or mistyping a url could be a serious criminal violation, in the view of some people in law enforcement, though not on the Oregon Supreme Court.

Barger was being investigated in a report of child sexual abuse; in the course of it, police seized and examined his computer. They did not find any saved pictures, videos or such – the kind of stored material that have formed the basis for similar cases in the past. But criminal charges based on the computer files did ensue:

Eugene police detective Williams, who was certified in computer forensics, took possession of the computer, made a copy of the hard drive, and used certain forensic software to examine that hard drive. Based on Williams’s findings, defendant was charged with eight counts of Encouraging Child Sexual Abuse in the Second Degree, ORS 163.686, by possessing or controlling a visual recording of sexually explicit conduct involving a child. Each charge was based on a separate digital image that Williams found in the computer’s “temporary internet file cache.”

As Williams later explained at defendant’s jury trial, temporary Internet files found in a computer are the product of an automatic function of a computer’s web browser. Whenever a computer user visits a web page, the browser creates a copy of the web page and stores it in a temporary Internet file “cache,” where it remains until the space is used up and written over, or it is erased. If a user calls up the same web page at some later date, the browser simply accesses the copy from the temporary files, rather than going through the slower process of downloading the same information from the web page. Computer users with ordinary skills would not necessarily be aware of that function or know how to go about accessing information stored in the temporary Internet file cache.

Williams testified that, when he received the computer, only one of the three addresses that had triggered Sullivan’s suspicions remained in the web-address registry but that, by examining other Internet activity files, he was able to identify two other suspicious web addresses that someone had accessed in the recent past. Williams stated that he checked all three web sites and that all appeared to contain pornographic images of prepubescent girls and girls in their early teens.

Williams testified that he then searched for similar images that might be stored on the computer’s hard drive, using certain words and phrases commonly used in child pornography. He acknowledged that he did not find any images of that kind that had been purposefully copied and saved in any user’s personal files. He did, however, discover sexually explicit images of prepubescent girls in the computer’s temporary Internet file cache.

The prosecution then presented the specific evidence that it asserts established defendant’s guilt of the eight charges of Encouraging Child Sexual Abuse. The evidence included the eight digital images, all of which Williams had discovered in the temporary Internet file cache of defendant’s computer, and which were the bases of the charges. Williams acknowledged that there was nothing about the images that identified what web site they had come from and that there was no way to know with absolute certainty whether the images had been accessed intentionally by a user or “were the result of pop-up windows or browser redirects.” Williams further explained, however, that pornographic pop-ups and redirects occur almost exclusively when a computer user visits another pornographic web site.

After presenting Williams’s testimony, the state rested …

Now imagine you’re bouncing around the web, following links or typing in, maybe not altogether accurately, urls. Suppose you land on a site like one of those – or something else, non-pornographic but nonetheless legally troublesome – and, appalled, immediately depart for somewhere else. (Remember the former porn site that used an address something like www.whitehouse.com? A lot of people stopped there in the early days of the web before finding out what it was.) That site’s record is in your browser’s cache. And according to the prosecutors, you’ve broken the child porn law (or some other, depending on the subject matter) and should be sent to prison.

The Oregon Supreme Court did not see it that way. It reversed the state court of appeals and circuit court, and said that “we are not persuaded by the state’s theories as to how and why, in the absence of some additional action by a computer user beyond that proved here, the user could be deemed to ‘possess’ or ‘control,’ in any sense that this court heretofore has recognized, a digital image that he or she has called up on a computer screen. Instead, we are satisfied that the statute before us, ORS 163.686(1)(a)(A)(i), when read in the light of its context … embodies a considered legislative choice not to criminalize the mere ‘obtaining’ or ‘viewing’ of child pornography without consideration. Thus, we conclude that the acts at issue here – navigating to a website and bringing the images that the site contains to a computer screen – are not acts that the legislature intended to criminalize.”

The casual web user may have dodged a bullet on this one.

Share on Facebook


So the four members of the Washington reapportionment commission are all chosen. Should make for lively meetings.

The second of two Republicans on the panel is the best-known figure of the four overall: former Senator Slade Gorton, the member chosen by Senate Minority Leader Mike Hewitt. House Republican Leader Richard DeBolt earlier picked former state Representative Tom Huff of Gig Harbor.

The Democrats, who haven’t been elected officials, will be Dean Foster, the only commissioner (so far) who has served on the panel before (in 2001), and former Seattle Deputy Mayor Tim Cies.

First job for the four will be choosing a fifth member who will serve as chair and presumably break ties.

Dave Ammons of the secretary of state’s office advises that “The four voting commissioners are doing their orientration and their first task will be to agree on their chairman. They won’t be able to do much actual mapdrawing until they get detailed census tract data in April.”

Off to the charts, soon enough.

Share on Facebook


Quite a bit of interest on this video about the megaload issue in this video (h/t to the OspreySteelheadNews blog). It is not a news vid – it is activist. But hang in toward the end, where there’s some discussion about the large picture financial and business implications – where the push for the loads is coming from.

As is so often the case, follow the money.

Share on Facebook


Close to two year has passed since the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, as a large and print publication, ended its run. And what of all the people who worked there?

The blog Safety Net has a thorough review, suggesting the longer-term results are maybe a little better than they once looked, but still far from great.

And remember as you read this that the people who worked at the P-I had on their resumes employment at one of the larger papers in the country.

Share on Facebook


Oregon Senator Jeff Merkley has been in the forefront of, well, an unusually large number of significant efforts over the last years, for newcoming senator. (Now he won’t be in the crop of the most-new.) One of the most useful, not to downgrade others, is his current effort to change (not end) the filibuster procedure in the Senate.

Merkley is actually a national leader on this, organizing the vote and often serving as the public voice. Here, he does a neat bit of framing: Restoring the filibuster to something like what it was in “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,” instead of what it’s like now, which is essentially filing a document with a clerk. Won’t be easy to argue against that.

Share on Facebook


Bob Tiernan

Not all the dynamics are public, now or maybe ever, for this sort of thing. But the departure of Bob Tiernan as chair of the Oregon Republican Party, a job he’s held basically for the last cycle, merits a little pondering.

The move wasn’t entirely unexpected. A number of other candidates have been circulating, the most visible of those being Allen Alley, who ran for governor last year and treasurer in 2008.

Often when a party chair opts out, the idea is that his (or hers) is the head to poll after an unsuccessful election. And you could say that Oregon was one of the minority of states holding back last year’s Republican tide, what with the ongoing failure to elect (ever since 2002) any statewide elected official.

But that would be a crimped view. Oregon Republicans actually have improved their situation significantly over the last couple of years. The biggest indicator was their return to clout at the legislature, where they now control an even half of the House, and picked up a couple of seats in the Senate. And then there was the almost-win for governor, the party’s best showing for a major office since 2002.

There’s more than that. Even more significant, maybe, than the even split in the state House was the candidate recruitment party people (including legislative leaders) did to fill legislative ballot slots. House leaders came close to filling the Republican line for all 60 seats, a remarkable achievement for a party in a significant minority, and probably a big part of the reason they did as well as they did in the general election.

The Republican press release on Tiernan’s departure also includes the usual list of achievements during his tenure; taken together, you have to say they add up to some real rehabilitation in organization and structure.

Opened a new ‘state of the art’ Republican headquarters in the heart of the Portland Metro area;
• Paid off over $200,000 in past vendor debt, the majority of the debt incurred by former party leaders;
• Hired an extremely talented and experienced staff (Brandon Danz – Executive Director, Julia Miller – Chief Administrative Officer, Greg Leo – Communications Director, Kevin Hoar – Field Director, Mark Krsak – Office Manager);
• Implemented a complete State Party Re-organization plan, which resulted in a stronger, broader-based party effort in the 2010 election, and lays the foundation for a stronger Oregon Republican Party in the 2012 Presidential election cycle;
• Launched an aggressive communications program featuring improved Press Relations and an aggressive outreach to the news media, giving the Oregon Republican Party a strong, clear voice during the 2010 elections;
• Implemented ‘state of the art’ technology, including an updated Republican Party website, used social media including Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube to connect directly with Republicans and conservatives, and initiated a VoIP phone system;
• Convinced the RNC to invest over $500,000 in Oregon to help Republicans get elected in last election cycle

Of course, the party still has problems – some big ones. Maybe a couple of the House seats Democrats lost were ceded because of campaign mistakes. And Republicans in Oregon still haven’t matched up in statement or vision, or image, with the population center of the state, which may be an ongoing problem.

Still, as Carla Axtman at Blue Oregon (a Democratic-oriented blog) noted, “it’s being reported that a number of GOP political leaders are ready to hand the party’s keys to Allen Alley. Alley is somewhat prochoice and has a reputation for generally being a moderate. This would be a major departure for the Oregon GOP, which has been in the ideological throes of far right conservatism for years.”

That, together with some of the structural repairs, could position Republicans somewhat better in the cycles ahead. The January 22 results will be worth a close watch.

Share on Facebook


In a Seattle Times Jon Talton column today, this list of Puget Sound area corporate headquarters that have gone away – somewhere – over the last decade: “It’s a painful list: Boeing, Washington Mutual, Safeco, Immunex, Puget Sound Energy during the last decade.”

The point of the column was to add another: Todd Pacific Shipyards, where 800 people in the area have worked.

At least this one isn’t going far away: The new owner, probably (the deal evidently isn’t final), is Vigor Industrial of Portland.

Talton adds this significant point: “Publicly traded Todd is essentially in play, and other bidders might emerge. Vigor is privately held and less vulnerable to Wall Street’s destructive whims (take note, Microsoft and others).”

Share on Facebook

Oregon Washington

The change that didn’t.

From the beginning of the year to the end of the year, the region’s unemployment percentages remained steady-state. It was the kind of solid, stable number that could be a good thing if it were a great deal lower. Every month, the state employment or labor departments in Washington, Oregon and Idaho would report their unemployment numbers. And every month, they would change hardly at all.

In November, Washington’s unemployment rate was 9.2%, exactly the same as the month before.

A couple of weeks ago, from our Oregon Public Affairs Digest: “Oregon’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate was 10.6% in November, essentially unchanged from 10.5% in October. The rate has been between 10.5 and 10.7 percent for the most recent 13 months. Oregon’s unemployment rate was 10.7 percent in November 2009.”

In Idaho, a little more movement up and down, but not much: “Idaho’s rate, a tenth below a recession high of 9.5% in February, remained below the national rate for nine years and two months. The state rate has exceeded the year-earlier rate for 39 straight months. The rate in November 2009 was 9%.”

Sooner or later, it’s gotta change. But it didn’t in 2010.

Share on Facebook