This Oregon legislative session, conducted amid tightly-split chambers, may go down as one of the more productive of the last decade, partly on the basis of maybe a half-dozen pieces of legislation that change significantly how a number of things operate. The health insurance exchange legislation, passed and signed earlier, is one example; Senate Bill 242 is another.
If it passes. At least check, though it passed the Senate 28-2 (last week), it has yet to hit the House floor for a vote. So we'll see.
In some ways, there's no bill philosophical issue with this one: It deals with restructuring as much as anything else. (It doesn't add funds, much as those are needed.) But the restructuring is important. In Oregon, the universities operate in a world separate from, say, the community colleges, and well away from public schools. The various pieces of education have little to do with each other, except for this: Many of them (not the public schools) are considered to be so integral within the state government system that getting things done, or even operating efficiently, has become very difficult. Simply removing some of the entanglements could help a system that has been badly underfunded, and in other ways legislatively undernourished, in recent years.
(Washington's system is stovepiped comparably to Oregon's; Idaho's is somewhat more unified, though efforts persist to split some of it apart.)
A closing debate last week by Senator Mark Hass, D-Beaverton, describes clearly the usefulness and point of the bill - and some of the problems it is intended to help solve.
With the legislature coming close to adjournment, possibly (so it's said) this week, House passage of this bill may be one of the determinants of just how productive this session ultimately is taken to be.