Press "Enter" to skip to content

Holding back the inevitable

Much as we love newspapers and worry about their ongoing sources of revenue, Ryan Blethen’s industry-pitch piece in the Seattle Times today – defending the newspaper role in publishing legal notices – doesn’t hold up.

Didn’t, really, a decade and a half or so ago when Ridenbaugh Press met from time to time with weekly newspaper editors and publishers and warned that the legal notices which long have been a key piece of income for them (less so, as a major slice of income, for dailies) eventually would go away. The web would make the newspaper component unnecessary and irrelevant, and that has real financial consequences for many newspapers (a reality certainly not relished here).

If it was true then, it’s a lot more true now, when so many newspapers see their web presence far outstripping print, and when so many people are accessing their information – of all sorts – on line primarily.

Blethen was concerned about Washington House Bill 1818 (from Representatives Ross Hunter, D-Medina, Zach Hudgins, D-Tukwila, and David Frockt, D-Seattle), which “Requires the department of information services to establish and maintain an online database for the purpose of publishing county legal or official notices required by law, or by an order of a judge or court.” That would open the door to maintaining a central, government-operated, online place where public notices – of ordinances, sheriff’s sales, regulations, zoning actions, bankruptcies, judicial orders, the run of government regulation – would be housed and made accessible.

Newspaper owners and their association are, of course, strongly opposed.

Blethen’s argument: “If newspapers are cut out of the process, government will control the public-notification process. The public deserves a middleman that ensures the message is delivered. Governments cannot be trusted to handle the entire process. Another flaw with Hunter’s bill is that it ignores reality. If everybody in the state had Internet access, there could be an argument made. But that is not the case, especially in rural and poor areas. Newspapers are still the easiest way to reach the most people. Take The Seattle Times, for instance. We reach about 70 percent of adults in King and Snohomish counties. No way government websites have, or ever will have, that kind of reach. How often is a person going to check out a state-run website packed with legal notices from every county in the state? Not often.”

Who’s out of touch here? If government agencies were going to mess around with the notification process, they could do it right now before delivery to newspapers – newspapers have no particular means to check on what ought to be posted as an ad. Internet access is broadly available, through libraries if nothing else, and the portion of population reading (print) newspapers has been falling hard – the lines probably crossed some time ago. How can anyone seriously argue that in 2011, print newspapers are more easily accessible to more people than the Internet? As to the concern about a state website becoming so large as to make the noticing unwieldy – oh please. How many people read carefully those long columns of agate in the papers like the Times running page after page of them? If they could be searched and divided as a good database would allow, though, they might be far more useful. And not just in one newspaper’s local circulation area, but world-wide.

Budget crunches of the moment may be part of the immediate prompt for this direction, but this is the way legal ads will be disseminated in the future. It will probably happen as soon as the newspaper lobby no longer is quite strong enough to hold back the inevitable.

Share on Facebook


  1. fortboise fortboise February 5, 2011

    The implication in Blethen’s argument is a wonder to behold. 70% of adults in King and Snohomish Counties are perusing the S-T’s legal notices? Ceriously, Shirley?

    I’m in an increasingly rare household that still gets daily delivery of a printed newspaper, but the most I’ve looked at the Legals for, um, EVER, is to note how much of the paper they take up (half or more of the “BUSINESS and Legal” section (as they call it) of the Statesperson, lately).

    A searchable and durable database would be a huge improvement for all concerned. Except those hoping to hang on to the buggy whip business, sorry.

  2. markmosk markmosk February 6, 2011

    Agreed on almost all counts. There is an argument to be made for the independence of a third party hosting this information. What makes this happen is functionality.

    Our local govs. are broke. In a perfect world we would publish notices on radio because there is a part of the community that can not read. But that would be ridiculously expensive. We have to make choices based on cost. Luckily there is a solution. Look at this site . It is FREE-You don’t have to subscribe to a newspaper to receive the notices THE NOTICES COME TO YOU-. No more hunting for notices in the back of the newspaper. They e-mail alerts based on preference of both type of notice and locality. (“Please e-mail me whenever there is a zoning hearing in Camden”. Set it up once and forget it. -IMMEDIATE-The local government doesn’t have to wait for the notice to be published in the newspaper for it to be published on line. The government employees can upload it straight to the site. -BETTER DISCLOSURE-They link to the original documents (zoning maps, bid specifications, providing way more information than a notice in print. In addition, they map to the localities-DOCUMENTATION- they provide affidavits of publishing. -GREEN- No cutting down trees to publish these notices. -PERMANENCE- The notices stay on line forever. In newspapers, they are published in a few editions and then are gone. COST SAVINGS- The local governments will save 90% of what they spend in notices. The newspaper’s publish the notices for only a few weeks.This issue is playing out all over the country. Read Newspapers do a lot of things really well. But so do a lot of businesses. It doesn’t mean as taxpayers we should overspend for a service that is now inferior

  3. […] A 21st Century Journey into the heart of darkness “…It’s Hell on Earth” a headline in the Seattle Times read this morning, quoting a U.N. worker on the ground in Haiti after the catastrophic 7.0 quake last Monday, which laid waste to the poorest country in the world. Equally apocalyptic headlines plaster every major news source from print to the internet this morning: “…It’s the darkest day for Port-au-Prince,” said Prime Minister Jean-Max Bellerive in another article. One hundred thousand are presumed dead, as the count mounts body-by-body piled in mass graves by the literal truck-loads, while crude hospitals are set up in school yards. The wounded are lined up on make-shift beds of cardboard and blue tarp as two-by-fours splint broken limbs and I.V.’s dangle from tree branches like bird feeders. Survivors desperate for drinking water rip pipes from walls to siphon what little moisture remains in their galvanized veins. The headlines and images coming out of Haiti this week read like Cormac McCarthy’s novel “The Road” and not Sunday morning news, as I sift through the heartbreaking headlines and sip my warm Starbucks decaf Americano with cream.Dance With Destiny is a feature-length documentary film by Bruce Weaver, due to be released later this year. Though the images from Haiti are devastating, they are not surprising to Weaver. His passionate, if not painful first film is a journey into the heart of darkness that Weaver contends is the inevitable outcome of a planet out of balance and perilously close to a point of no return, according to the films’ panel of expert witnesses. The film is both a personal journey of one man’s radical love of the earth, of indigenous peoples, of all things wild and unindustrialized, and an uncomfortable wake-up-call all at once. The horror playing out in Haiti this week is but a shrill “…cymbal crashing amidst a back story of global events playing like one of Beethoven’s turbulent symphonies,” as Weaver has said:  recent tsunamis in Indonesia, the levy break in New Orleans, the polar caps melting like ice cream on a sweltering summer day into an ocean presently being Hoovered of 90% of its species—– the largest mass extinction since “The Great Dying,” 241 million years ago, You may also find this relevant: […]

Comments are closed.