Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts published in October 2008

Sarah Palin, the College Years

Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin

We raised the question a while back having to do with vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin's main link to Idaho, her time at North Idaho College and the University of Idaho. The question concerned her frequent changes of venue during her college years, involving thoe institutions and others in Alaska and Hawaii.

A piece in the Los Angeles Times today, looking into Palin's college years, clears up some of that, and some more; it's a good read for anyone interested in the connection. It isn't especially either positive or negative, but it does fill in some curious gaps.

Her near-invisibility at the University of Idaho does remain a curiosity, though. Turns out that Jim Fisher, now editorial page editor at the Lewiston Tribune, once taught her in a 15-student upper-level class, but doesn't recall her at all. Neither does her academic advisor at UI.

Washington reality check

Finally, here's the picture in Washington state, where as in Oregon the presidential is in no serious doubt, but the next top race - for governor - is genuinely close.

For governor (there being no U.S. Senate race in Washington this year):

And the closest U.S. House race, in District 8, with limited polling but an intriguing trend line:

Oregon reality check

The presidential race in Oregon seems to be a progressively foregone conclusion, but that Senate race - albeit with a blue tilt - is absolutely a popcorn watch.

Now the more exciting Senate battle:

As in Idaho, there's not really enough data for a solid chart in the one hot U.S house race (in district 5).

Idaho reality check

At the Atlantic blog run by Andrew Sullivan, you periodically see posted Pollster.com composites of polling information, showing trend and status. These are usually noted under the heading, "reality check."

Seems about right. And at two weeks out from election day, seems a fair time to run them out for the Northwest. Major races in Idaho first.

Senate race:

There is a chart for the first U.S. House district race, but the polling it represents is thin for compilation purposes.

WA Gov: Endorsements, etc.

Got an e-mail on Thursday from friends in Kitsap County, where they just voted by mail: "What a great day!" They noted their presidential choice - which in Washington state seems not much in doubt - but not their gubernatorial. And that one is in some doubt.

It will not be as close as the last one, in 2004. 133-vote margins just never happen, except maybe once. We should have a pretty clear idea on election night, or the morning after at least, who will be governor the next four years. But, while we continue to suspect that Democratic Governor Chris Gregoire will narrowly outpace Republican challenger Dino Rossi, it's not likely to be by much. This isn't likely to be an early-evening call.

What with ballots out and cast, the newspaper endorsement picture in Washington is wrapped up now.

Gregoire's corner includes the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the Tacoma News Tribune, the Spokane Spokesman-Review (just today), the Vancouver Columbian, the Portland Oregonian, the Everett Herald (today), the Kitsap Sun (today), the Bellingham Herald (today) and the Mount Vernon Skagit Valley Herald. The Tacoma, Everett and Spokane papers are reversals from four years ago, when they backed Rossi.

Rossi got backing from the Seattle Times (today), the Tri-City Herald, the Yakima Herald-Republic and the Walla Walla Union-Bulletin. The endorsements at the Tri-Cities and Walla Walla are reversals reversal from 2004, when those papers endorsed Gregoire.

The Rossi endorsements generally focused on the budget, noting that Gregoire has increased spending just ahead of dark money days. (The Gregoire arguments tend to be a little more broadly-based.) The Tri-Cities argument, though, is so specific it merits a review here:

And as much as we admire and respect Gregoire -- and even understand to some extent why west-side politics may have constrained her giving meaningful support to the Areva project -- our first loyalty is to the Tri-Cities, which remains bitterly disappointed over this loss.

Areva represented the possibility of adding a $2 billion uranium enrichment facility and 400 high-paying jobs to the Tri-Cities but is gone now for good.

But instead of growing our nuclear future, we're worried about Richland losing its existing fuel fabrication plant and its 600 good jobs.

When upgrades are needed in Richland, will Areva spend the money here or just build a plant next to its new uranium enrichment facility in Idaho?

The fact is the Herald's gubernatorial endorsement probably was Gregoire's to lose, and lose it she did.

Areva probably will cost her votes in the Tri-Cities, though it may draw a blank elsewhere.

In all of this, you get some feeling of closeness. There' a little endorsement movement toward Gregoire, but it's not everwhelming. This thing is tight.

Endorsements: Backing Obama in Idaho

The Idaho Statesman becomes the first Idaho paper to endorse for president (so far as we've seen - if you've seen any to the contrary let us know). And in a state that will go for Republican John McCain, but in a city that probably will go for Democrat Barack Obama, it went for Obama.

Highly notable (and useful) was this line toward the end of the end of the editorial: "In what, by comparison, pass for measured moments, McCain and Palin simply insinuate that the Democratic ticket is out of touch and elitist. It's not only a bogus claim - given Obama's and Biden's backgrounds - but it's a silly form of reverse snobbery. Our nation has to stop equating intellect with elitism and viewing intelligence with scorn and skepticism. Considering the problems at hand, there is no better time than now to change our thinking."

Some lowest-common-denominatorism is to be expected in political campaigns, but at least we should aspire to better.

Side note: Does this mean Republican Jim Risch will get the nod for U.S. Senate? (See: Oregon, endorsements . . .)

Endorsements: The Mugwumpy O

Of course this was what the Oregonian was going to do: Never any question about it. It endorsed Democrat Barack Obama for president and Republican Gordon Smith for (re-election to) the U.S. Senate.

On the first, this: "In the century and a half that Oregon and The Oregonian have been making presidential choices, there has rarely been a time when the nation so desperately needed a sharp change in direction. To provide that change, The Oregonian strongly urges voters to support Barack Obama."

On the Senate race: "It is a close, contentious and very negative contest in which both men can make cases for themselves. With his seniority, record of moderation, ear for the concerns of Oregonians and willingness to break with his party when the circumstances call for it, we think Smith makes the better case."

Maybe the more key reference was this: "The goal of the Democrats at this moment in history is to gain unquestioned control of the legislative process. In the Senate, that means establishing a 60-vote, filibuster-proof supermajority. The generic nature of their efforts in support of Merkley suggest they are more interested in getting their 60 votes than they are in the welfare of the citizens of Oregon. Merkley's own campaign has focused on his party's views of national and international issues and, where Oregonians come into the picture, they are often illustrations of those broader topics."

Endorsements: Another break

Since the Bladine family in 1928 bought the newspaper at McMinnville (then called the Telephone-Register, now the News-Register) it has listed itself politically as "Independent Republican." In presidential campaign endorsements, it is has been universally Republican - until now.

Today's endorsement editorial breaks the pattern of 80 years, backing Democrat Barack Obama. (The paper has mixed its other endorsements, backing Republican incumbent Gordon Smith for the Senate, for example.) It was not a limp endorsement, either: "Only one candidate stands for change in this year’s presidential race — Barack Obama. Obama’s intellect, temperament and ability to inspire are precisely what we need after a disastrous eight years under George W. Bush."

The owner and publisher, Jeb Bladine, offered a column that offered some explanation for the break: "Others on our editorial board passionately believe that Barack Obama, not John McCain, should become our 44th president. By power of ownership, I could have overturned that vote. But much as I believe in a moderate Republican philosophy, I also see the need for dramatic action seeking to break the deadlock and malice that has marred our political landscape for too long."

And to his fellow Republicans, this: "The Republican Party needs transformation and resurgence, which just might begin after the national rejection coming in November. Meanwhile, the country needs to unite behind someone who can elicit a national willingness to sacrifice for common goals related to energy, the economy, health care and international diplomacy. I hope Barack Obama is that leader."

Endorsements: Precedent shock

On a day when the Chicago Tribune endorsed a Democrat for president, for the first time in its 160 years; and when the Los Angeles broke its decades-long precedent of declining to endorse anyone for president - both went for Democrat Barack Obama - the Northwest come up with a startling endorser of its own.

The Vancouver Columbian ordinarily endorses toward the right, and usually Republican on the presidential level - it went for George Bush in 2004. But not this year. From its endorsement editorial today:

"As for judgment, Obama chose a running mate who neither hurt him in the polls nor diverted the spotlight from the main man on the ticket. McCain’s choice has done both. McCain tries to masquerade this recklessness as the virtue of a maverick. Would he use that same recklessness in appointing Supreme Court justices and Cabinet members? Which candidate in recent weeks has shown a presidential demeanor? Which could best restore worldwide respect for the U.S.? Which man has tried to soothe — not stoke — rancor in the homestretch of this campaign? Clearly, that man is Obama. . . . America’s comparison between the upstart reformer and the venerable war hero inexorably returns to the qualities of leadership and judgment. Obama wins that comparison, and his message of partnerships at home and abroad seals the deal for us."

Watch this space tomorrow, for what we anticipate will be another endorsement stunner . . .