Let’s pause a moment to review the sequence of events, as they have emerged, following the legal repositioning of cold medicine from last year.
Components of many cold medicines are often used in creating methamphetamine, so Oregon lawmakers decided to slap controls on them, taking them off shelves and keeping track of who buys them. To that was soon added a similar, but somewhat less sweeping, federal law. We were skeptical about how much good this would do.
On the plus side, there have been consistent reports that the number of local small-scale meth producers – the kind of places operating in houses and other small buildings – have declined considerably. Those places have been hazards, so this much is good news.
The rest of the story: Meth use has remained roughly constant, evidently not declining at all. And where they are getting the stuff? From the Oregonian (a major crusader on meth) today: “Those small-time dealers largely have been replaced, law enforcement officials say, by gangs who buy the drugs in large quantities and sell them in bulk to lower-level dealers.”
In other words, more larger-scale trafficking, more concentrated money involved, even more guns and even more violence. The state’s solution (understandable under the immediate narrow circumstances) – at least that of initiative developer Kevin Mannix and a growing number of state legislators – is to increase the allowable prison sentences for drug dealers. Hello more prisons and ever-ballooning ex-cons to come. And very little more done to actually reduce the number of meth users (although a number of efforts, from drug courts to other kinds of rehab, do show signs of promise).
Meth is a very real problem; there’s no making light of that. But we just keep doing such a wonderful job of dealing with it, you have to wonder when some new approaches will take root.Share on Facebook