Aug 29 2007
And is this thing ever not over yet. We’d anticipate that Idaho Senator Larry Craig will be spending a few days in quietude, evaluating and processing and doubtless talking with selected people about what, exactly, needs to happen next, now that he’s had his public say (as he did yesterday afternoon, at Boise – see the post below). For the rest of us, yes, there remain some more things to say. More still may emerge later.
This is a massive national story, and it will not end soon. In just the last two hours, we fielded calls from Associated Press radio (Washington), the Washington Post and the Boston Phoenix. Check out the Idaho Statesman‘s page containing links to its recent material on Craig; it’s a very long list.
We have a Recommended Read: Today’s take by Bryan Fischer of the Idaho Values Alliance, whose views on this may stand as a helpful bellwether on this for a substantial portion of Idahoans. Fischer long has been a supporter of Craig, and he obviously takes no joy from what has been happening; he also seemed willing (notably in his post before this one) to give Craig the benefit of any reasonable doubt. He writes here that he watched Craig’s statement Tuesday and watched it closely, but he could not find it exculpatory – it was “unconvincing and unpersuasive.” Craig, he said, has lost the ability to lead (especially on those issues of top concern to Fischer), and “the appropriate and right thing for the senator to do at this point is to step down.” Fischer does not sound bitter or angry; he does sound deeply saddened.
He also notes this: “One significant feature of yesterday’s press conference is that there were virtually no Republican Party leaders in attendance, and, further, party leaders seem to have draped a blanket of silence over the entire party apparatus. Virtually no highly placed Idaho Republican has gone on record in support – wholehearted or otherwise – of the senator. The best that party leaders have been able to say so far is that they take the senator at his word and hope the public will not rush to judgment. This tepid support may be an indication that the senator’s GOP colleagues believe there is substance to the charges, and are finding it difficult to publicly affirm the senator or defend his behavior.”
He almost certainly right. Consider the web headline from today’s Statesman report: “Sen. Larry Craig asks forgiveness; GOP seeks ethics probe.” The White House says it is “disappointed in the matter.” Presidential candidate and Senate colleague John McCain remarked “It’s disgraceful,” on Jay Leno’s talk show, after Leno launched an extended round of gags on the incident. A least one Republican member of Congress has called for his resignation. Media talker Sean Hannity: “Senator Craig, if you have been engaged in this activity, resign.” Republican leadership has asked him to give up his committee assignments (the last step, ordinarily, before pushing for resignation – after all, what use is a senator without a role on committees?). Craig is getting no defense from his party; they’re throwing him overboard.
Coincidentally, Democrat Larry LaRocco already had scheduled an open thread/live blogging session on Daily Kos today. Wisely, he steered well away from the Craig hurricane. Responding to another comment, he quoted Craig as saying he would announced his plans on running for another term next month. Then, “I have approached this race by trying to control what I can control and taking in stride what I can’t control. I can’t control the Idaho GOP and their nomination process. In the meantime, I wake up every day believing in myself and working hard.” There’s some earned wisdom in those remarks.
One of the recurring questions this morning has been, to what extent are Idahoans sticking with Craig? The answer seems to be: Craig’s support has dropped fast. A quick Survey USA poll shows 55% favoring resignation, and 34% staying in office at least for now. We suspect that’s not far off. And his job approval fell from 60% late last year to 38% now (never mind that the current events had nothing to do with the performance of his job).
Editorial in the Lewiston Tribune: “As it stands, however, he has deceived his constituents. The only question is how many times. And it’s impossible to see how he can remain long in office.” The Coeur d’Alene Press: “Our thoughts today go out to the many people Sen. Craig has let down. He should give them solace by exercising, in his final act as a public service, true leadership: resigning and letting someone else complete the remainder of his term.”
In partial counterpoint, there’s also a substantial wave of reaction – more on the liberal side than conservative, but some of both – asking the question: What was it exactly that Craig did in the Minneapolis rest room that was, or should have been, illegal? Tapping one’s foot? What specific action crossed the line? (No sexual act occurred, and no words about sex were spoken.) Precisely how was law broken? There’s not an easy answer to that (we’d be interested in seeing such an analysis); a rundown of this is on a New York Times political page.Share on Facebook