Press "Enter" to skip to content

Posts published in “Day: August 22, 2007”

MacPherson’s in

Greg MacPherson

Greg MacPherson

Representative Greg MacPherson wasted no time - barely a day after incumbent Democratic Attorney General Hardy Myers said he would retire, fellow Democrat MacPherson formally said he's in the race. Not only that, his web site is already up - the man was prepared.

That may not be enough to scare off all primary competition; word still is that law professor John Kroger will join in shortly. But there is a sense here of hitting the ground running here.

For now, we'll make only the suggestion that MacPherson's campaign may be tied to some extent to the Measure 49 (the Measure 37 land use scaleback) ballot issue. His links to the issue run deep, not only in his own legislative career, but also that of his father, former state Senator Hector Macpherson, who was one of the creators of the land use law Measure 37 took on. And make the note that his Lake Oswego-based House seat, which has held solidly enough till now, may become hotly competitive next year - one of the few uplifting pieces of political news Oregon Republicans have gotten this year.

Salutary education

We more than you might expect with Bryan Fischer's latest argument on Idaho legal/education/sex policy. Let's open with excerpts from his Idaho Values Alliance blog:

In many states, including Idaho, sex outside marriage is against the law, and that includes consensual sex between teenagers. Sex outside marriage, whether “fornication” or “adultery” from a legal standpoint, is punishable by both a fine and imprisonment.
Yet educating teens about the legal risks they run if they become sexually active before marriage is a topic that is rarely if ever discussed in sex ed classes. I’m guessing educators show less restraint in making students aware of the legal risks of drunk driving or possession of drugs, but common sense dictates that making young adults aware that their behavior is not only dangerous but also illegal ought to be a part of a thorough education. . . .

Most teens and many parents in Idaho are most likely unaware that consensual teenage sex is a crime. Idaho lawmakers adjusted our sex offender statutes to include a “Romeo and Juliet” exception that keeps a young man who is a statutory rapist from being required to register as a sex offender, but when a male of any age – including a teenager - has sex with a girl under the age of 18 he is guilty of rape under Idaho law, whether the sex was consensual or not. Idaho law requires that he be sent to prison for no less than one year.

Fischer's point that sex outside marriage violates Idaho law is correct (see most specifically the law against fornication), also that the law is rarely enforced (there have been a few occasions) and he probably is right too that relatively few Idahoans know any of this.

We have strongly believed for a long time that a basic crash course in law - civil and criminal, law as it affects ordinary people moving through society - for a semester or two ought to be a basic component of public education at the high school level. The idea that we're supposedly educating a corps of citizens who derive most of what they know about the law from TV shows is appalling. We'd not argue at all with Fischer's suggestion that the law as it relates to sex might be a slice of that course.