Apart from one early count on Sound Politics (which has held up pretty well), there hasn't been much rundown of exactly where Tuesday's elections left the Washington legislature, other than that Democrats did really well and Republicans didn't.
Here's what we take away from the election results so far, recognizing that not all votes have been counted but also that, in most cases, at least enough have to nail down results. We see only two Washington legislative races still in realistic doubt.
|Chamber||2004 Dem||2004 Rep||2006 Dem||2006 Rep||2006 undec|
*House numbers are thrown a bit by the Rodney Tom party shift.
About the two seats we single out . . . Both are currently held by Republicans who were running for re-election. Incumbent Republican Barbara Bailey in District 10, as of the end of last week, held a 172-vote advantage over Democrat Tim Knue; she's favored for re-election, but this is still too close to definitely call unless (and this wasn't clear) all votes are in. On the other hand, Republican incumbent Jim Dunn in District 17 is behind 144 votes, losing to Democrat Pat Campbell; but again, we're not clear on what ballot remain out there. If one went Democratic, the House split would be 65-32 - a more than two-thirds margin, which could have significance in some House procedural or other actions.
For a good many years, most of the last decade at least, Washington's statehouse could reasonably have been described as closely split (especially bearing in mind the case of Tim Sheldon in the Senate). That is no longer true: Democrats now hold the most decisive margins in both chambers that either party has enjoyed in a long time.