Archive for September, 2006

Sep 21 2006

Communities, beloved and not

Published by under Oregon

Asuggested reading for a reflective moment: An essay called “Beloved Community,” written by Portland Buddhist Sallie Jiko Tisdale about a series of meetings between people at the Dharma Rain Zen Center and students and instructors at the conservative Christian Multnomah Bible College and Biblical Seminary. The article appeared in the Buddhist magazine Tricycle in August.

It’s a thoughtful piece about two groups looking for ways to bridge their differences – an uncommon challenge since those differences are so very wide. They differ not just about policy and politics but about the nature of the cosmos.

There are some striking passages. There was this, from one of the Christian leaders:

“I like the word ‘orthodox’ better than the word ‘conservative,’” he says. “I find it hard to call myself a conservative because of the negative connotations.” One of Paul’s concerns is the significant difference between “theological conservatism” and the conservative politics with which it is usually associated. He mentions Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. “We agree on basic doctrine,” but it stops there. He adds, “It’s shameful to me, some of what they say.”

The effort at reacing out and listening sounds like a substantial educational effort in itself. A recommended read.

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 20 2006

Working to live

Published by under Idaho,Oregon,Washington

The latest wage gap study for the Northwest is out, published as usual by the Northwest Federation of Community Organizations, and once again required reading for anyone trying to evaluate the realities of life in the region, even if the results aren’t all that different from last year.

Living wage reportWages have been rising in recent years, a little, but the report documents how the amount needed for a “living wage” – the amount of money needed to practically support a person or a family in a given place at a given time, has been steadily rising – in larget part because of the explosion of health care and insurance costs.

Is full-time work enough to aff ord a family’s basic needs and ensure an adequate standard of living?
While most people would suggest that work should be enough, the data presented in the Northwest Job Gap Study show that often this is not the case. Even as economic reports herald a strong and growing economy, this prosperity continues to be a false promise for many families, for whom living wage work remains out of reach. In the Northwest and around the nation, many people – particularly people of color – are finding that working full time does not provide a sufficient salary to meet their basic needs.
The Northwest Job Gap Study: Living Wage Jobs in the Current Economy demonstrates the reality that working people experience. Using an analysis of public data from a range of state and federal sources, this study calculates a basic family budget for different family structures in Idaho, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. Based on this “living wage,” the study then estimates the number and proportion of current jobs in the Northwest that provide a suffi cient wage to support an individual or a family’s basic needs without relying on public assistance.
The findings show that working full time is often not enough to maintain an adequate standard of living. Even dual-income families, where both adults are using all of the resources at their disposal to earn a living, often find they are not earning enough.

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 19 2006

Partisan balance

Published by under Washington

As this is written a couple of counties, Asotin and Skagit, are still out, as are some additional scattered precincts. But there’s enough in to get a fair idea of the partisan balance in this primary election – the first time Washingtonians have had to choose between parties in the primary.

Neither party had compelling primary contests; there’s no reason one ought to have outpolled the other based on immediate reasons. So how does the state break down?

Grand total (again, at this point, just before midnight election night): 304,208 Democratic ballots to 236,203 Republican – 49% to 38% (the remainder choosing neither party’s primary).

Most of the counties – especially most of the rural counties – held a Republican edge. Those were counterbalanced by the larger counties including King (41,761 to 14,697), Pierce (41,455 to 27,914), Snohomish (36,569 to 21,748), Kitsap (21,048 to 11,150) and Clark (27,855 to 19,816). The biggest Republican county was Spokane (26,902 to 35,055).

A playground for political analysis. We’ll be back to this.

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 19 2006

No sale

Published by under Washington

This isn’t a runaway; at this writing, the Alexander-Groen contest for Washington Supreme Court isn’t yet settled. But while a broad swath of opinion suggested that the swampingly large pileof money supporting John Groen’s effort to oust incumbent Chief Justice Gerry Alexander would be enough to prevail, indications now are that … it was not.

Gerry Alexander Several possible conclusions can be drawn from this. We’ll highlight two that could be significant for the election, and the election cycle, ahead.

One is that the message got through that a narrow band of interests was the basis of the Groen candidacy, and that was wrong. This may be somewhat unfair to Groen, who likely has interests and abilities well beyond those of concern to his supporters. But it isn’t unfair to the movement that backed him, and to them this result – so far (with thousands of ballots yet to come), an Alexander win at about 53% – serves as a rebuke.

Separately, this race together with the other one hotly contested, involving Justice Susan Owens and her main chellenger, state Senator Stephen Johnson, should generate concern to Washington’s Republicans. The judicial positions are of course nonpartisan, but to a considerable degree the lines behind the incumbents and the challengers seem to have matched with partisan lines – Democrats probably voted strongly for the incumbents and Republicans for the challengers.

Considering that neither party had within its own ranks any strong primary contests (the U.S. Senate primaries were non-events), the judicial battles served to a degree as useful surrogates. in that battle, the challengers (the Republican side) had significant advantages. In seat 8 (Alexander-Groen) the challenger had a huge money advantage, and in seat 2 (Owens-Johnson) the incumbent was considered the most liberal member of the court and his challenger won a raft of newspaper endorsements, along with other advantages. Neither were enough. To be sure: The Owens-Johnson battle isn’t over, since she didn’t reach 50% of the vote (other candidates were also running) and will face Johnson again in November. But the margin at present is 45.6% to 32.6% – a big lead, hardly a promising start for Johnson.

An early indicator for November 7 in Washington? Wouldn’t be surprised.

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 19 2006

Back channel?

Published by under Idaho

So why, coincident with his refusal to join in a debate on Idaho Public Television (sponsored by the Idaho Press Club and the League of Women Voters), did Republican gubernatorial candidate C.L. “Butch” Otter agree to a debate with Democratic candidate Jerry Brady on KTVB-TV?

There’s been a lot of discussion about that. There’s the idea that Otter has effectively taken a shot at the Idaho Press Club, but that doesn’t seem right; he’s gotten some bad press this year all right, but the Press Club isn’t responsible for that and he’d be facing journalists at the KTVB event too.

Then there’s the idea, floating as well, that he’s just more comfortable with Boise’s Channel 7; a number of people who have been key long-time staff there have had substantial conservative and Republican associations. That’s not an accusation of skewed journalism, but even if the product is solidly neutral, there may be on a personal level a feeling of greater comfort for Republican politicians.

We were inclined to dismiss that theory too, but the surfacing Wednesday of the Otter-KTVB emails, by rival KBCI-TV does give us pause. Someone apparently leaked a batch of communications (18 faxed pages) between Otter’s campaign and people either at KTVB or associated with its planned debate, written and sent in August and early September. Continue Reading »

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 19 2006

Sprawling out

Published by under Idaho

Agreat deal of the residential development growth in the Boise area has centered on projects to the east, north and west. But let us not forget the south.

Pleasant Valley South LLC is asking for zoning permission and annexation for about 800 acres south of Boise, along the southern reaches of Cole Road (due south by a miles or so of Governor Jim Risch’s residence). Some business development and about 1,800 homes would be built there, presumably providing residence for about 5,500 people. The legal process involved is underway at Boise city hall.

Boise is already considering annexation of an area just north of that.

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 18 2006

The right, not the ability

Published by under Oregon

Comedian Ron White has a crowd-pleasing bit about his arrest for drunken behavior at a New York bar, and his conversation during that event with the police. Alcohol had loosened his tongue, and he baited them, playing the smartass. As he recalled, “I knew I had the right to keep silent. I had the right. I just didn’t have the ability.”

Now federal prosecutors are jumping into the ability of people to maintain their rights, and it should chill anyone interested in preserving their rights should they ever have a run-in with the law.

One of our well-known rights, as anyone who has watched a police show in the last generation well knows, is the right to be represented by an attorney, to the point that one will be appointed and paid by the state if one cannot otherwise be afforded. The idea is that people charged with a crime ought to have some support and counsel on which they can rely and in whom they can confide, so they aren’t simply railroaded by overmatching expertise. That is why attorney-client confidentiality is so strictly protected in legal proceedings.

Or at least it has been. But suppose you’re in a legal jam and you want the advice of a lawyer. How candid will you be with that lawyer – and, as a result, how effective can he be – if you knew that everything you said might wind up in the hands of the prosecutors? That pretty much wipes out your right to legal help, doesn’t it? Under those conditions, you’d probably be as well off representing yourself. (Which – don’t get us wrong – is poorly.)

Can’t happen because of the attorney-client privilege, you say? Guess again.

The Eugene Register Guard reports about Roseburg attorney David Terry, apparently the lawyer for several people who have been either suspected or charged with drug offenses. On September 13, the RG says, “More than a dozen [federal] agents with a search warrant approved by a federal magistrate judge walked into the office of David Terry just after 7 a.m. and seized financial, property, business, travel and personal records of 17 people. Terry, a lawyer for 27 years, is not charged with any crime. However, he is obviously the unnamed ‘Attorney A’ in a 196-page federal indictment issued Wednesday that named 12 men allegedly involved in an international conspiracy to smuggle marijuana and cocaine, grow marijuana and make methamphetamine.” Continue Reading »

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 17 2006

In the center of the boom

Published by under Washington

Sometimes the pieces come together in ways you didn’t quite foresee. Well, maybe you did; we didn’t.

We know about the significance of the housing boom, out of which the air now begins to leak. Housing – the financial deals being made, the money arising from seemingly nowhere, the tremendous number of houses being built nationally which has fostered a real boom in construction activity – is the underpinning for the largest share of prosperity the region and the nation has.

We also know that one of the hottest-button political issues on the scene today is that of what to do about people who are in this country illegally. And we’ve heard no end of political rhetoric on that subject. But their presence in this country is hardly new; is there any reason we should be more concerned, or that their presence is in some way more significant, than it was 10 or 20 years ago?

To put these pieces together, check out a Seattle Times report today about something really significant: The overwhelming numbers of illegal aliens who are employed in housing construction projects.

A quote from Jim Nietmann, who manages construction of thousands of houses – currently at Issaquah: “If I look outside my window right now it looks like we’re south of the border … Easily half are from Mexico, and they’re fueling our industry.” The article also suggests that five times as many people here illegally are working in construction, as opposed to agriculture.

Spin out the implications. Matters of the border tend to get more complex the more closely you look at them.

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 17 2006

Alternative financing

Published by under Washington

In today’s Danny Westneat column bemoaning the attempt by the Building Industry Association of Washington to buy a seat on the Washington Supreme Court – and yes, that is what it is trying to do – appear two notably useful points.

One is the unprecedented nature of the seven-figure sums raised for a Supreme Court candidate, in this case a challenger to an incumbent (and broadly respected) chief justice. The incumbent is Gerry Alexander; the challenger is John Groen, whose signs are closely-placed all over the state, and broadcast ads on whose behalf are spaced even more closely. Apart from the ugly nature of the campaign, which last week dominated politics in Washington state, is the idea that one narrow group would spend the concentrated funds to place its own partisan – and Groen is a former counsel for BIAW and served on its board – in office. They may get it done, too, since Washington voters have been inundated with anti-Alexander ads drastically outnumbering those on the opopsition (which are mostly anti-Groen).

Westneat points out: “A single special interest, the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW), has directed more than $1 million trying to buy its handpicked candidate, Redmond lawyer John Groen, a seat on the state Supreme Court. The special-interest spending for a judgeship is unprecedented. If you add in $357,000 spent mostly on Groen’s behalf by a national business group, Americans Tired of Lawsuit Abuse, these two fat cats have spent more trying to get their guy on the court than all nine candidates themselves combined.”

Let’s put on a wider-angle lens: What’s happening in this race has been happening for a decade and more in the case of ballot issues – narrow interest groups, or individual people of wealth, subsidizing ad campaigns that, for a short run at least, can influence enough voters to pass an issue or elect a candidate. (Oregon saw it earlier this year when Republican gubernatorial candidate Kevin Mannix was overwhelmingly and massively unwritten by a single welathy friend, who didn’t even, any longer, live in Oregon.) Increasingly, our system of electoral politics is being gamed by a handful of people who don’t parting with wads of cash in the interest of making a good investment – a government that will see things their way.

Is there a way out? Continue Reading »

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 16 2006

Shifts at Lee

Published by under Oregon

One of the largest media companies operating in the Northwest, Lee Enterprises, seems to be shifting direction a bit.

For the last few years, it has been expanding steadily in the region, picking up properties here and there; the largest in recent years was the big acquisition of almost all of the newspapers in south-central Idaho. In Washington, it owns the daily at Longview; in Oregon, the dailies at Corvallis, Albany and Coos Bay (the latter a recent buy from Pulitzer). It also has owned a bunch of other properties in the region.

So the recent word of a big selloff of many of its operations in the region draws some natural interest. None of those daily newspapers were among the items sold. But it is selling a group of small commercial publications – 13 in all – at Spokane, Kennewick, Moses Lake, Wenatchee and Walla Walla. Some printing businesses will be sold, and ownership interst in the Little Nickel and Nickel Ads Classified operations housed at Seattle and Portland.

And one substantial general newspaper property, the Newport (Oregon) News-Times, will be sold to News Media Corporation. News Media currently has two properties in the Northwest, both Oregon coastal papers, the Florence Siuslaw News and the Waldport South Lincoln County News.

What does it mean? Is there some pullback from the Northwest? Or just a reshuffle of the books?

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 15 2006

Sali-Grant 1: punchless

Published by under Idaho

At a table in the back of the room, the organizers had popcorn poured into a big bowl, ready for people to munch as they watched the contest at the other side of the room. (It was, after ll, ne in a series of North Idaho College popform forums.) This meet-up between the two main candidates for the 1st congresional district was the first big Idaho debate of the general election season, and much anticipated as a prospective definer of candidacies.

And since Republican Bill Sali had a reputation as a bomb-thrower, and since he went all ninja on his fellow Republicans in their primary debate (albeit quite effectively), and since Grant had a public persona to define, the stage seemed set for a slugarama.

We didn’t need the popcorn.

Sali Grant debate

It turned out to be a studiously competent discussion of philosophy and outlook.

Sali’s performance in this debate was simply best piece of sustained public speaking we’ve ever seen from him. (Maybe he’s done better elsewhere, but this is the best we’ve seen.) And please draw no implications of faint praise, either. He did exactly what he needed to do, which was to reassure the many conservative Republicans in the district that he is of a piece with the conservative Republicans they’ve been sending to Congress for so many years. He did that while sounding cool and mainstream, and the rhetoric about not accepting the status quo and shaking up procedures in Congress – which in other contexts could sound edgy – here, in this context, sounded a little perfunctory. But he walked the line with skill, sticking to his ideological approach while presenting it in such a moderate way that you were left with little to feel uneasy about. On top of that, Sali delivered on the heart-warming stuff, connecting with surprising skill on an emotional level. And he had a good close, too: “We need a simpler life with less government, and that’s the direction I’m going to take you in as your next congressman.”

Sali seemed to play down (not to the point of ducking) his signature issues, abortion and gay marriage; in this debate, they became barely a footnote. Asked a pointed question about the English-as-official-language proposal he endorsed, Sali spoke about his father, who in his early years spoke German but made a point of learning English. (His argument didn’t really cover the full sense of the objections to the proposal, but it worked on an empotional level.)

He did all that without a single attack – not so much as a side-comment – on Grant. Toward the end, speaking on the subject of competition, he said that Grant had made him a better prospective public servant by becoming his opponent. Nor did he attack anyone else, not even anyone named Clinton or Kennedy.

It was a master performance. For anyone watching, Sali defined himself in a way that completely contradicted every news report thi year about how difficult he, as a legislator, has been to work with. If he continues doing that in his two or three (sounds as if there may be four debates in all) upcoming performances, he will have positioned himself as simply a likable conservative Republican, which is all he really needs to do to win.

Grant’s performance was generally good too, if a little less sweeping.

From a launch that was a bit stiff, he gradually warmed to the audience and got better, it seemed, with every question or comment. By the end he was bordering eloquent, and beginning to convey well to the audience his passion for the race – his concern about the country’s direction and what needs to be done to correct it, “to restore this country to the greatness and respect it deserves” (a good line). Like Sali, he did all that without ever going on the attack, at least against anyone personally. This was Grant’s first real debate of this sort, and he did well. If he picks up next time with his end point in Coeur d’Alene, putting the corporate attorney further behind and focusing on the passion he clearly feels in this campaign, he will doubtless impress the next audience ven more.

There were no substantial gaffes or glitches. (There were not a lot of very quotable lines, either.) It was a low key Friday night entertainment. It was, however, good civics.

NOTES: Post-debate reports varied widely in focus on various topics. A useful scattering of reactions and observations shows up on Dave Olivieria’s Huckleberries, with the added interest that Oliveria was one of the panelists (and asked the only questions to elicit gasps from the audience). Julie Fanselow, blogger for Red State Rebels and the Grant campaign, observes that “Analysis by Randy Stapilus that goes on just a bit too much about how Bill Sali didn’t alienate the crowd. But Stapilus is right: This race is Sali’s to lose if he can convince Idahoans he is a happy-go-lucky conservative and not the extreme and divisive figure he’s been in the Idaho Legislature.”

Failed to note in the original post that the debate was sponsored by the Coeur d’Alene Tribe (which had a large presence in the room) and North Idaho College. The Panhandle doesn’t always get debates held locally; maybe the involvement of these two substantial local organizations helped pull off this one. Then again, neither of these two candidates were trying to duck.

Share on Facebook

3 responses so far

Sep 15 2006

How involved

Published by under Oregon

As nuts and bolts time arrives in this year’s cycle, watch for the involvement of church organizations in Republican campaigns. We’ll be watching the playout, for example, in Oregon’s House District 30, where Loaded Orygun may have caught a tax-exempt religious organization directly working on the campaign of a Republican legislative candidate.

The seat is open. The Democrat in the race is David Edwaards, the Republican Everett Curry. Loaded Orygun said that it was told about a phone calling operation in the district on behalf of Oregon Right to Life which, after checking phone numbers, traced back to the Bob Cryder Team Ministries, which has been registered as a religious organization. Such a listing allows for substantial tax advantages, and there are consequences for directly engaging in political activity.

There are questions here. The posting about the calls led to a long list of comments (worth reading), the last of which (as we read them) offered a cautionary note: Under some circumstances, a religious organization can rent out its phone lines for political groups as long as it does do in an even-handed and free-market fashion. Not knowing the rest of the details yet, we’ll contnt ourselves with watching, for the moment.

But don’t expect this will be the last post on this subject.

Share on Facebook

One response so far

Sep 14 2006

Road signs

Published by under Washington

Road-tripping around rural Washington the last couple of days, we spotted political signs here and there, but not quite the indications of super-high interest.

Most signs we saw in driving about 500 miles of east-of-Cascades Washington highways this week, from Goldendale to Colville, were about local races. Second was judicial – the striking visibility of judicial races was especially notable in Spokane, where most of the judicial candidates had posted billboards in the central city area. (Not a commonplace.) Congressional and even legislative candidates were back in the pack.

Of course, we’re just now coming up on the primary, not the general, so that may be a factor.

Around the 5th district, from Okanogan to Republic to Spokane, we did see a number of signs. We were interested that the number of signs for incumbent Republican Cathy McMorris and challenging Democrat Peter Goldmark were roughly balanced. And the Goldmark signs were posted on a surprising number of ranch properties. Maybe his cowboy-hat image is catching on in some of those quarters.

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 14 2006

Top 10 ID xgr: The premier races

Published by under Idaho

In Washington and Oregon, the two major parties each elect enough members to the chambers that control of all four of those chambers is this election year, realistically, up for grabs – the idea of one party or the other winning enough to change control isn’t unreasonable. Not so in Idaho, where the Republican dominance is so sweeping that Democratic control of either chamber is into meteorite-falls-on-your-head territory. Actually, given the numbers of candidates, beyond that.

That still doesn’t mean the contests are insignificant. Even a small minority party can make its influence felt, as the Democrats did in the last special session. And they can grow their numbers, and some net growth seems likely this election. How much? Consider the list here, and evaluate for yourself. (Our early estimate: by about 2-5 seats.) The following races (as in Washington and Oregon) are listed for a mix of their probable closeness, their intensity, and their larger significance.

Our Oregon list appeared last week, and the Washington list will be posted after that state’s primary election. The races are listed by district number.

blue glass District 1 House A, incumbent Eric Anderson, R-Priest Lake; challenger Steve Elgar, D-Sandpoint. Elgar ran one of the most energetic and best-funded state legislative races in Idaho in 2004, and he still lost by familiar margins. This year (as of the post-primary reports) he’s again outspending Republican Eric Anderson, and he’s a more familiar figure, running in what should be a somewhat better year for Democrats. With what results will be curious to see. Continue Reading »

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 13 2006

Conservative regulation

Published by under Oregon

Bill Sizemore is certainly a familiar figure in the initiative wars, so his presence on the ballot this time is more normal than not. His Measure 42 – the proposed ban on using credit scoring for setting insurance rates or sales – is still more than a little intriguing, because it appears to break a pattern of another kind.

Sizemore is a conservative, and usually found in opposition to government spending and regulation. Measure 42 is quite emphatically an extension of government regulation, a point Sizemore acknowledges.

So why is he doing it?

In a post on Oregon Catalyst, he first delivers a thoroughly convincing argument against credit scoring (with which we take no issue). But whart about the matter of regulation? He then explains: “I realize that some of my fellow conservatives might object to more government regulation of business, which this measure is. To them, I would simply respond: When government requires citizens to buy a product, as is the case with insurance, the product is no longer truly a “free enterprise” product. We have to buy their product. We have no choice. When we are required by law to buy a product, the playing field is automatically tilted in the seller’s favor, in which case it is important that reasonable controls be installed to insure that consumers are not gouged. Passing Measure 42 is the right thing to do. Credit scoring is an unconscionably unfair and discriminatory practice.”

There’s one glitch. While governments do in some cases require purchase of insurance (for motor vehicle drivers, for instance), it doesn’t in many others – health or renter insurance, for instance. As we undertand Measure 42, its provisions would cover them all.

The argument Sizemore presents for his issue is fundamentally sound. We won’t even suggest that he needs a new fig leaf for it.

Share on Facebook

One response so far

Sep 13 2006

A piece of the debates

Published by under Idaho

The joint appearance in Portland by three of the five gubernatorial candidates – Mary Starrett of the Constitution Party, Joe Keating of the Pacific Greens and Richard Morley of thr Libertarians – was a heartening sign all by itself. It showed that three people of radically – really radically – differing voewpoints could meet together in common cause.

Albeit in joint interest.

The three of them were complaining that sponsors of what will amount to three or four (the number remains a bit uncertain) debates between Democratic incumbent Ted Kulongoski and Republican challenger Ron Saxton are devoted solely to those two. Of course they’re complaining; the spotlight won’t be on them.

Which doesn’t mean they don’t have a point.

In the latest round of polling, Zogby interactive gives Kulongoski a 5.8% lead in a head-to-head contest with Saxton, but that expands to more than 7% when Starrett is added to the mix. Starrett is estimated at 4.5% in the poll. That’s evidence she alone is enough to influence the race, which opens the door to the idea that the other two could be factors as well.

The usual argument for including the top two (maybe, sometimes, three) candidates is that, realistically, one of them will be the eventual winner. But what if you throw two other factors into the mix: (1) that the minor party candidates, or some mix of them, could affect the race, as one probably did last time in Oregon’s gubernatorial, and (2) there are multiple debates ahead. What would be the big problem with ruling that of these three or four meetings, we devote one of them to all five candidates?

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

Sep 12 2006

Mud from behind rocks

Published by under Washington

On the highly recommended list – this traceback blog post by the Majority Rules Blog, trying to answer what should be a simple question: Who is Americans Tired of Lawsuit Abuse, the Virginia-based group which has dumped $357,000 into an attack-ad campaign against Washington Supreme Court Chief Justice Gerry Alexander?

Steve Zemke followed the basic filing information back as far as he could, back to Virginia. Not much was available on the surface; those leads went cold at phone numbers answered only by message machines, and residential fax lines. The road eventually leads to the American Tort Reform Coalition and its political director, who was also a top official and staffer at the Republican National Committee. The piece is well worth a look, bearing in mind the question that grabs Zemke and should grab you: Why are these guys being so secretive and hiding behind so many shells? Continue Reading »

Share on Facebook

Comments Off

« Prev - Next »



WASHINGTON-OREGON-IDAHO Our acclaimed weekly e-pubs: 35-45 pages Monday mornings getting you on top of your state. Samples available. Contact us by email or by phone at (208)484-0460.



"Essentially, I write in the margins of motherhood—and everything else—then I work these notes into a monthly column about what it’s like raising my two young boys. Are my columns funny? Are they serious? They don’t fit into any one box neatly. ... I’ve won awards for “best humorous column” though I actually write about subjects as light as bulimia, bullying, birthing plans and breastfeeding. But also bon-bons. And barf, and birthdays." Raising the Hardy Boys: They Said There Would Be Bon-Bons. by Nathalie Hardy; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. 238 pages. Softcover. $15.95.
Raising the Hardy Boys page.



"Not a day passes that I don’t think about Vietnam. Sometimes its an aroma or just hearing the Vietnamese accent of a store clerk that triggers a memory. Unlike all too many soldiers, I never had to fire a weapon in anger. Return to civilian life was easy, but even after all these years away from the Army and Vietnam I find the experience – and knowledge – continue to shape my life daily."
Drafted! Vietnam in War and in Peace. by David R. Frazier; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton OR. 188 pgs. Softcover. $15.95.
The DRAFTED! page.


Many critics said it could not be done - and it often almost came undone. Now the Snake River Basin Adjudication is done, and that improbable story is told here by three dozen of the people most centrally involved with it - judges, attorneys, legislators, engineers, water managers, water users and others in the room when the decisions were made.
Through the Waters: An Oral History of the Snake River Basin Adjudication. edited by the Idaho State Bar Water Law Section and Randy Stapilus; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. 300 pages. Softcover. $16.95.

Oregon Governor Vic Atiyeh died on July 20, 2014; he was widely praised for steady leadership in difficult years. Writer Scott Jorgensen talks with Atiyeh and traces his background, and what others said about him.
Conversations with Atiyeh. by W. Scott Jorgensen; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. 140 pages. Softcover. $14.95.

"Salvation through public service and the purging of awful sights seen during 1500 Vietnam War helicopter rescue missions before an untimely death, as told by a devoted brother, leaves a reader pondering life's unfairness. A haunting read." Chris Carlson, Medimont Reflections. ". . . a vivid picture of his brother Jerry’s time as a Medivac pilot in Vietnam and contrasts it with the reality of the political system . . . through the lens of a blue-collar, working man made good." Mike Kennedy.
One Flaming Hour: A memoir of Jerry Blackbird. by Mike Blackbird; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. 220 pages. Softcover. $15.95.
See the ONE FLAMING HOUR page.

Back in Print! Frank Church was one of the leading figures in Idaho history, and one of the most important U.S. senators of the last century. From wilderness to Vietnam to investigating the CIA, Church led on a host of difficult issues. This, the one serious biography of Church originally published in 1994, is back in print by Ridenbaugh Press.
Fighting the Odds: The Life of Senator Frank Church. LeRoy Ashby and Rod Gramer; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. 800 pages. Softcover. $24.95.


by Stephen Hartgen
The personal story of the well-known editor, publisher and state legislator's travel west from Maine to Idaho. A well-written account for anyone interested in Idaho, journalism or politics.
JOURNEY WEST: A memoir of journalism and politics, by Stephen Hartgen; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. $15.95, here or at (softcover)



NEW EDITIONS is the story of the Northwest's 226 general-circulation newspapers and where your newspaper is headed.
New Editions: The Northwest's Newspapers as They Were, Are and Will Be. Steve Bagwell and Randy Stapilus; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. 324 pages. Softcover. (e-book ahead). $16.95.
See the NEW EDITIONS page.

How many copies?


The Field Guide is the reference for the year on Oregon politics - the people, the districts, the votes, the issues. Compiled by a long-time Northwest political writer and a Salem Statesman-Journal political reporter.
OREGON POLITICAL FIELD GUIDE 2014, by Randy Stapilus and Hannah Hoffman; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. $15.95, available right here or through (softcover)


by Randy Stapilus and Marty Trillhaase is the reference for the year on Idaho Politics - the people, the districts, the votes, the issues. Written by two of Idaho's most veteran politcal observers.
IDAHO POLITICAL FIELD GUIDE 2014, by Randy Stapilus and Marty Trillhaase; Ridenbaugh Press, Carlton, Oregon. $15.95, available right here or through (softcover)

without compromise
WITHOUT COMPROMISE is the story of the Idaho State Police, from barely-functioning motor vehicles and hardly-there roads to computer and biotechnology. Kelly Kast has spent years researching the history and interviewing scores of current and former state police, and has emerged with a detailed and engrossing story of Idaho.


How many copies?
The Old West saw few murder trials more spectacular or misunderstood than of "Diamondfield" Jack Davis. After years of brushes with the noose, Davis was pardoned - though many continued to believe him guilty. Max Black has spent years researching the Diamondfield saga and found startling new evidence never before uncovered - including the weapon and one of the bullets involved in the crime, and important documents - and now sets out the definitive story. Here too is Black's story - how he found key elements, presumed lost forever, of a fabulous Old West story.
See the DIAMONDFIELD page for more.

Medimont Reflections Chris Carlson's Medimont Reflections is a followup on his biography of former Idaho Governor Cecil Andrus. This one expands the view, bringing in Carlson's take on Idaho politics, the Northwest energy planning council, environmental issues and much more. The Idaho Statesman: "a pull-back-the-curtain account of his 40 years as a player in public life in Idaho." Available here: $15.95 plus shipping.
See the Medimont Reflections page  
Idaho 100, about the 100 most influential people ever in Idaho, by Randy Stapilus and Martin Peterson is now available. This is the book about to become the talk of the state - who really made Idaho the way it is? NOW AN E-BOOK AVAILABLE THROUGH KINDLE for just $2.99. Or, only $15.95 plus shipping.

Idaho 100 by Randy Stapilus and Martin Peterson. Order the Kindle at For the print edition, order here or at Amazon.


    Monday mornings on KLIX-AM


    ORDER IT HERE or on

    More about this book by Randy Stapilus

    Water rights and water wars: They’re not just a western movie any more. The Water Gates reviews water supplies, uses and rights to use water in all 50 states.242 pages, available from Ridenbaugh Press, $15.95


    ORDER IT HERE or on

    More about this book by Lin Tull Cannell

    At a time when Americans were only exploring what are now western states, William Craig tried to broker peace between native Nez Perces and newcomers from the East. 15 years in the making, this is one of the most dramatic stories of early Northwest history. 242 pages, available from Ridenbaugh Press, $15.95



    The Snake River Basin Adjudication is one of the largest water adjudications the United States has ever seen, and it may be the most successful. Here's how it happened, from the pages of the SRBA Digest, for 16 years the independent source.

    Paradox Politics


    After 21 years, a 2nd edition. If you're interested in Idaho politics and never read the original, now's the time. If you've read the original, here's view from now.

    Governing Idaho:
    Politics, People and Power

    by James Weatherby
    and Randy Stapilus
    Caxton Press
    order here

    Outlaw Tales
    of Idaho

    by Randy Stapilus
    Globe-Pequot Press
    order here

    It Happened in Idaho
    by Randy Stapilus
    Globe-Pequot Press
    order here

    Camping Idaho
    by Randy Stapilus
    Globe-Pequot Press
    order here