The real issue in the legal case that has been preoccupying Boise for the last three months or so – the justification, or lack or it, for a police shooting, of a teenager named Matthew Jones – drills down to this: How confident are Boiseans that their local elected officials are making straight decisions on police shootings?
Erwin Sonnenberg, who has been Ada County coroner almost forever, is central here. The concern raised is that he’s too close to the Boise police, close enough that he will see things their way in evaluating a police shooting rather than taking a strictly neutral view. Back in the 90s when the Boise police had a larger rash of shooting incidents, similar concerns were also raised, though with less visibility than this time.
Much of that, whether valid or not, is personal to Sonnenberg. Which doesn’t weaken the valid contention by Ada County Prosecutor Greg Bower that the system for handling especially sensitive determinations of death – by inquest – is outmoded. The Idaho Statesman article today on this notes:
Bower on Wednesday called the current inquest system “archaic” and said his staff is investigating alternatives. The point of an inquest is to “promote public confidence” in the investigations of shootings, Bower said. But inquests may be having the opposite effect by unnecessarily delaying the release of information, he said.
An inquest also can create unneeded grief for the officers and families of the deceased by requiring them to relive highly emotional events when prosecutors already have a clear idea of whether criminal charges will be filed, Bower said.
Changes in this area would have to be addressed in state law. Expect the subject to arrive at the Statehouse in January.Share on Facebook